Consider a market with two firms, Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Dell, that sell printers. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($500) or a low price ($350) for their printers. These price strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. HP's profits are in red and Dell's are in blue. Suppose HP and Dell are initially at the game's Nash equilibrium. Then, HP and Dell advertise that they will match any lower price of their competitors. For example, if HP charges $350, then Dell will match that price and also charge $350. What effect will matching prices have on profits (relative to the Nash equilibrium without price matching)? Assuming HP and Dell can coordinate to maximize profits, HP's profit will change by $ and Dell's profit will change by- (Enter either positive or negative numeric responses using integers.) Price $500 = Dell Price = $350 Price = $500 $70 $80 $70 $20 HP Price $350 $20 $50 $80 $50

Consider a market with two firms, Hewlett-Packard (HP) and Dell, that sell printers. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($500) or a low price ($350) for their printers. These price strategies with corresponding profits are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. HP's profits are in red and Dell's are in blue. Suppose HP and Dell are initially at the game's Nash equilibrium. Then, HP and Dell advertise that they will match any lower price of their competitors. For example, if HP charges $350, then Dell will match that price and also charge $350. What effect will matching prices have on profits (relative to the Nash equilibrium without price matching)? Assuming HP and Dell can coordinate to maximize profits, HP's profit will change by $ and Dell's profit will change by- (Enter either positive or negative numeric responses using integers.) Price $500 = Dell Price = $350 Price = $500 $70 $80 $70 $20 HP Price $350 $20 $50 $80 $50

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter15: Imperfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.5P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Intel and AMD are the two dominant producers of microchip processors. The following matrix gives the payoffs (in millions of dollars) of the two firms for different combinations of their pricing strategies. The first number is Intel's payoff and the second AMD's. AMD Intel Low Price High Price Low Price 35, 30 30, 60 High Price 70,25 65,55 O If this game is played sequentially, the Nash equilibrium will not change irrespective of who moves first. If this one-shot game is repeated for 10 times, the Nash equilibrium is for both firms to choose High Price. O In this game, Pareto criterion leads both firms to choose High Price. This game is an example of coordination game.
O Cell A O Cell C O Cell E O Cell I None of the above
Consider the following game: Mercedes-Benz and Honda are the only two firms in the market for automobiles. Each firm has two strategies: produce high-grade vehicles or produce low-grade vehicles. The first entry in the bracket is the payoffs (in $billion) of Mercedes-Benz and the second entry is the payoffs of Honda. (see the image) What is the dominant strategy of Mercedes-Benz and Honda? Also, what is the Nash equilibrium of this game?
Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Felix and Janet are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Felix chooses Right and Janet chooses Right, Felix will receive a payoff of 3 and Janet will receive a payoff of 7. Attached the table The only dominant strategy in this game is for (Janet / Felix) to choose (Left / Right). The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Felix chooses (Left / Right) and Janet chooses (Left / Right).
Consider a market with two firms, Kellogg and Post, that sell breakfast cereais. Both companies must choose whether to charge a high price ($5.00) or a low price ($3.00) for their cereals. These price strategies, with corresponding profits, are depicted in the payoff matrix to the right. Kellogg's profits are in red and Post's are in blue. What is the cooperative equilibrium for this game? Kelogg Price- $5.00 Price $3.00 OA The cooperative equilibrium is for Kelogg to choose a price of $3.00 and Post to choose a price of $5.00. OB. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $3.00. OC. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg and Post to both choose a price of $5.00. OD. The cooperative equilibrium is for Kellogg to choose a price of $5.00 and Post to choose a price dk $3.00. OF Acooperative equilibrium does not exist for this game 00 Price= $5.00 1200 S000 $1.000 Post Is the cooperative equilibrium ikely to occur? $1.000 Price $3.00 450 The…
4. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Flashfry Pricing High Low Warmbreeze Pricing High Low 11, 11 2,13 13, 2 10, 10 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $13 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $2 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. price, and if Flashfry prices low, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. Considering all of the…
Two firms, X and Y, are involved in a price war. The demand equations for each firm are the following: Qx = 52 - 2Px + Py Qy = 52 - 2Py + Px Further, assume the cost of each unit of out is constant at $4. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? (Use the best response functions in a graph to answer) There is no Nash equilibrium O $24 $20 $22
Two firms must simultaneously decide whether to enter a market. The payoffs resulting from their decisions are illustrated in the figure to the right. Determine the mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium for this game. The mixed-strategy Nash equilibrium is for Firm 1 to not enter with probability 0₁ = probability 0₂ =. (Enter your responses rounded to two decimal places.) and for Firm 2 to not enter with Don't enter Firm 2 Enter Don't enter 0 4 0 Firm 1 0 Enter 0 -4 2 - 2
Imagine two Pizzerias are playing a static game where the firms have to choose their strategies simultaneously, selecting a strategy that maximizes its profit given what it believes the other firm will do. Their decision is how many pizzas to produce. They can choose between producing 100, 150 or 200 pizzas each. The profit for respective firm is showed in the payoff matrix below. a) What is the solution (if there is one) and also describe the characteristic features of this game. b) If this game was played repeatedly, could that potentially change the outcome of the game? In your answer, you are expected to motivate and describe how.
Consider the following simultaneous-move game that represents the payoffs from different advertising campaigns (low, medium, and high spending) for two political candidates that are running for a particular office. The values in the payoff matrix represent the share of the popular vote earned by each candidate is given below. The equilibrium in dominant strategies Candidate A-low Candidate A-medium Candidate A-high Ois (low. low). O is (medium, medium). O is (high, high). O is (medium, high) O does not exist. Candidate B-low Candidate B-medium Candidate B-high 50, 50 60,40 80, 20 40, 60 50, 50 65, 35 20, 80 35,65 50, 50
Two firms face decisions with two alternatives that can be modeled using Game Theory. For each of the situations described below, CIRCLE the ("Nash") equilibrium (or equilibria) for the "game" given the profit payouts (firm 1, firm 2) for the choices for the firms (or mark "None"). a. Sell One Medium-Size Item or Sell One Large Item and One Small Item Firm 1 Choices Firm 2 Choices Medium-Size Item Large and Small Items Medium-Size Item 31,27 25, 33 Large/Small Items 42,24 30,28 b. Use "9" Price Endings or Use "5" Price Endings Firm 2 Choices Use "9" Price Endings | Use "5" Price Endings Firm 1 Choices Use "9" Endings Use "5" Endings 45,28 42,30 c. Hire a Celebrity Endorser or Donate to Charity 27,25 25,28 Firm 2 Choices Firm 1 Choices Hire Celebrity Endorser Donate to Charity Celebrity Endorser 40, 29 30, 33 Donate to Charity 37,36 48, 32 d. Locate Downtown or Locate in Suburban Strip Mall Firm 2 Choices Firm 1 Choices Locate Downtown Locate in Strip Mall Locate Downtown 32,31 28, 34…
What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? In the Nash equilibrium both Saudi Arabia produce a low output and earn a profit of $100 million and $20 million respectively. In the Nash equilibrium both Saudi Arabia produce a high output and earn a profit of $60 million and $20 million respectively. In the Nash equilibrium Saudi Arabia produces a low output and earns a profit of $80 million and Nigeria produces a high output and $30 million respectively. There is no Nash equilibrium.