(a) Provide an estimate of the US price elasticity of demand for Roundup. Be clear about the assumptions your estimate is based upon. (b) Based on your estimate of the price elasticity of demand, do you think Monsanto's price decrease caused an increase in Monsanto's profits? (Hint: recall that profit equals revenue (i.e., px q) minus cost. You will have to make an assumption regarding the value of unit cost.)

Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Course List)
16th Edition
ISBN:9781305506725
Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Chapter24: Price-searcher Markets With High Entry Barriers
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 13CQ
icon
Related questions
Question

figures 5.8 and 5.16 provided. everything is provided so there should be no excuse to not answer it. the previous 2 'experts' are dumb and couldn't provide me with an answer

 

5.22. Monsanto's Roundup™. Roundup, the trademarked name
of glyphosate, a chemical herbicide developed and patented in the
1970s, was Monsanto's leading product for decades. In the late 1990s,
it became the best-selling agricultural chemical of all time and an
enormously profitable product for the company. Glyphosate-based
herbicides produced net sales for Monsanto of $2.4b in 2001 alone,
nearly half the Mosanto's total.
5.3. OUTPUT LEVEL AND PRICE
212
This success was the result of several factors. One was a con-
scious strategy to reduce price in the US, where patent protection
gave Monsanto an effective monopoly until September 2000. (Prices
were lower outside the US, where patents expired earlier.) Between
1995 and 2000, Monsanto reduced the price by an average of 9% a
year. When volume increased by an average of 22% a year, revenue
and profits exploded. Table 5.8 displays the values of prices and unit
sales, both in the US and overseas. Figure 5.16 plots the various time
series.
Another factor in Roundup's success was the increasing popu-
larity of conservation tillage, an environmentally friendly method of
farming in which crops are planted without first plowing the fields.
With less plowing, there is less loss of topsoil and moisture. The
problem is weeds. Instead of plowing them under, farmers eliminate
weeds before planting by applying a nonselective herbicide such as
Roundup. Analysts suggest that conservation tillage is sensitive to
the price of herbicides, an important component of its cost.
A third factor was the development of herbicide-tolerant crops.
Monsanto's Roundup Ready corn was approved in 1998, and soy-
beans followed shortly thereafter. Monsanto argued that Roundup
and Roundup Ready seeds were complementary products, with
price reductions in one increasing demand for the other.
Even as patents expired, Monsanto was able to maintain high
market shares. In Brazil, for example, Monsanto's patent expired in
1981, yet its 2001 market share was 81%. High market share, in turn,
allowed Monsanto to exploit economies of scale and work its way
down the learning curve.
Transcribed Image Text:5.22. Monsanto's Roundup™. Roundup, the trademarked name of glyphosate, a chemical herbicide developed and patented in the 1970s, was Monsanto's leading product for decades. In the late 1990s, it became the best-selling agricultural chemical of all time and an enormously profitable product for the company. Glyphosate-based herbicides produced net sales for Monsanto of $2.4b in 2001 alone, nearly half the Mosanto's total. 5.3. OUTPUT LEVEL AND PRICE 212 This success was the result of several factors. One was a con- scious strategy to reduce price in the US, where patent protection gave Monsanto an effective monopoly until September 2000. (Prices were lower outside the US, where patents expired earlier.) Between 1995 and 2000, Monsanto reduced the price by an average of 9% a year. When volume increased by an average of 22% a year, revenue and profits exploded. Table 5.8 displays the values of prices and unit sales, both in the US and overseas. Figure 5.16 plots the various time series. Another factor in Roundup's success was the increasing popu- larity of conservation tillage, an environmentally friendly method of farming in which crops are planted without first plowing the fields. With less plowing, there is less loss of topsoil and moisture. The problem is weeds. Instead of plowing them under, farmers eliminate weeds before planting by applying a nonselective herbicide such as Roundup. Analysts suggest that conservation tillage is sensitive to the price of herbicides, an important component of its cost. A third factor was the development of herbicide-tolerant crops. Monsanto's Roundup Ready corn was approved in 1998, and soy- beans followed shortly thereafter. Monsanto argued that Roundup and Roundup Ready seeds were complementary products, with price reductions in one increasing demand for the other. Even as patents expired, Monsanto was able to maintain high market shares. In Brazil, for example, Monsanto's patent expired in 1981, yet its 2001 market share was 81%. High market share, in turn, allowed Monsanto to exploit economies of scale and work its way down the learning curve.
50
40
30
20
10
80
60
40
Price ($ per gallon)
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Sales (millions of gallons)
US
overseas
20
US
overseas
Year
FIGURE 5.16
Roundup's price and sales (US and overseas)
Year
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
intro micro v 1.3.2
5.3. OUTPUT LEVEL AND PRICE
Year
(a) Provide an estimate of the US price elasticity of demand
for Roundup. Be clear about the assumptions your
estimate is based upon.
(b) Based on your estimate of the price elasticity of demand,
do you think Monsanto's price decrease caused an
increase in Monsanto's profits? (Hint: recall that profit
equals revenue (i.e., p × q) minus cost. You will have to
make an assumption regarding the value of unit cost.)
TABLE 5.8
Roundup's price and sales (US and overseas)
Price ($ per gallon)
US
45
44
40
35
33
28
25
23
Overseas
Quantity (millions of gallons)
US
Overseas
13
16
20
28
33
40
45
39
1995
21
1996
20
1997
18
1998
16
1999
15
2000
14
2001
15
2002
14
Source: Bear Stearns proprietary data, with thanks to Frank Mitsch.
Done
25
30
40
54
64
73
72
55
A
(c) Monsanto has been selling Roundup for decades. If the
price decrease did indeed cause an increase in profits,
why didn't Monsanto do it before the mid-late 1990s?
213
D
Transcribed Image Text:50 40 30 20 10 80 60 40 Price ($ per gallon) 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Sales (millions of gallons) US overseas 20 US overseas Year FIGURE 5.16 Roundup's price and sales (US and overseas) Year 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 intro micro v 1.3.2 5.3. OUTPUT LEVEL AND PRICE Year (a) Provide an estimate of the US price elasticity of demand for Roundup. Be clear about the assumptions your estimate is based upon. (b) Based on your estimate of the price elasticity of demand, do you think Monsanto's price decrease caused an increase in Monsanto's profits? (Hint: recall that profit equals revenue (i.e., p × q) minus cost. You will have to make an assumption regarding the value of unit cost.) TABLE 5.8 Roundup's price and sales (US and overseas) Price ($ per gallon) US 45 44 40 35 33 28 25 23 Overseas Quantity (millions of gallons) US Overseas 13 16 20 28 33 40 45 39 1995 21 1996 20 1997 18 1998 16 1999 15 2000 14 2001 15 2002 14 Source: Bear Stearns proprietary data, with thanks to Frank Mitsch. Done 25 30 40 54 64 73 72 55 A (c) Monsanto has been selling Roundup for decades. If the price decrease did indeed cause an increase in profits, why didn't Monsanto do it before the mid-late 1990s? 213 D
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Multiplicative Exponential demand Model
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506725
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Microeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506893
Author:
James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. Macpherson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning