3) Two investment options are analyzed against each other. They both have an internal rate of return above the MARR of 10%. They both have lives of 8 years. Using incremental analysis, decide which option is the best. Initial Cost Annual Benefit Operations & Maintenance Salvage A B 200,000 275,000 75,000 80,000 25,000 40,000 10,000 45,000

3) Two investment options are analyzed against each other. They both have an internal rate of return above the MARR of 10%. They both have lives of 8 years. Using incremental analysis, decide which option is the best. Initial Cost Annual Benefit Operations & Maintenance Salvage A B 200,000 275,000 75,000 80,000 25,000 40,000 10,000 45,000

Name: 3) Two investment options are analyzed against each other. They both
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:50:59.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: 3) Two investment options are analyzed against each other. They both have an internal rate of returnabove the MARR of 10%. They both have lives of 8 years. Using incremental analysis, decide whichoption is the best.Initial CostAnnual BenefitOperatio

EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337514835

Author:MOYER

Publisher:MOYER

Chapter5: The Time Value Of Money

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 13P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Compare the following two alternatives by the IRR method, given MARR of 6%/year. First find if they are feasible and then compare them with the incremental rate of return (AROR). Alt. Construction cost $ Benefits $/yr Salvage $ Service Life (yrs) A 410,000 55,000 20,000 11 B 250,000 35,000 10,000 11
5. Compare the following two alternatives by the IRR method, given MARR of 6%/year. First find if they are feasible and then compare them with the incremental rate of return (AROR). Alt. Benefits S/yr Salvage S Service Life (ys) Construction cost $ 410,000 55,000 20,000 11 B 250,000 35,000 10,000 11
1. Compare the following alternatives using the Net Present Worth (NPW) method. Rate 5% per year. Construction $ Benefits $/yr Life years A 400,000 200,000 5 700,000 220,000 10 2. Solve the same problem using the Net Equivalent Uniform Annual (NEUA) method. What do you conclude?
Compute the IRR, NPV, Pi, and payback period for the following two projects. Assume the required return is 10%. Year Project A Project B 0 $-200 $-150 1 $200 $50 2 $800 $100 3 $-800 $150 Please show inputs from the BAII Plus Financial calculator of how to get these answers
The five alternatives shown here are being evaluated by the rate of return method: If the alternatives are independentand the MARR is 17% per year, which alternative(s) should be selected? A D E Initial Investment ($) -25,000 -35,000 -40,000 -60,000 -75,000 i% (ROR versus DN) 9.6% 17.1% 13.4% 27.4% 22.2% O a. A and C O b. O C. All of them O d. B. D, andE Incremental cash flow = cash flowB – cash flowA. where larger initial investment is EN al!
Two alternatives are being considered: B First cost Uniform annual benefit Useful life, in 5000 9600 1750 1850 4 8 years If the minimum attractive rate of return is 7%, which alternative should be selected? Solution: 1. Use the increment analysis, we should use 2. Terms n= 3. The Increment CFD has 3 basic patterns: O AP= O AA= O AF= occurred at end of year 4. AROR= % 5. Choose Please answer all parts of the question.
Determine the B/C ratio for the following project.First Cost = P100, 000Project life, years = 5Salvage value = P10, 000Annual benefits = P60, 000Annual O and M = P22, 000Interest rate= 15%
An investment offers the following: a series of $1000 annual payments, starting one year from now, for a total of 12 payments. If your opportunity cost (as an EAR) is 5%, what is the investment worth to you today? Group of answer choices $11,079.20 $9,214.56 $10,103.26 $8,863.25 $10,241.19 Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion
An investment opportunity has an initial cost of $2. 4M and a uniform annual benefit of $600,000 over 6 years. Using a MARR of 10%, what is the benefit- cost ratio of this opportunity? Would you recommend it be pursued? Why or why not?
A defender and a challenger are considered in a replacement analysis. The following decision tree includes the data where FC: first cost, AB: annual benefit; C: Challenger and D: Defender. If annual compound interest rate is 10%, when must we replace the defender? Node no branch Cash flow FC=-45,000 $ Life=20 yrs AB= +8,500 $ FC=-10,000 $ Life=5 yrs AB= +4,500 $ FC=-10,000 $ Life=5 yrs 10 2 D 1D AB= +5,500 $ FC=-35,000 $ Life=15 yrs AB= +4,500 $ FC=-10,000 $ Life=5 yrs AB= +5,000 $ FC=-25,000 $ Life=10 yrs AB= +9,000 $ FC=-20,000 $ Life=5 yrs AB= +6,000 $ FC=-15,000 $ Life=5 yrs AB= +5,000 $ 20 3 1D 20 10 2 D
3) Data for 2 alternatives are given below, determine the cost of alternative B so that the two alternatives will be equally desirable. Assume an interest rate of 15%. Use benefit cost ratio analysis Alternatives B Cost P100kX Salvage Value 10k 16k Annual Benefit 28k 30k Life (years) 10 12
Which alternative should be selected using the incremental rate of return analysis, if MARR =11.0%? Do- nothing A B C D First Cost 0 $10,000 $4000 $10,000 $7000 Annual benefit 0 1,806 828 1,880 1,067 Life 10 Years ROR 12.5% 16.0% 13.5% 8.5% a. B, because its ROR is the highest b. Something other than C, because C costs the most initially c. C, because the C-B increment has a ROR of 11.78% and the A-B increment has a ROR of 10.5% d. C because C has the highest annual benefit