The topic of this paper is privacy. It will talk about the ethical and legal reasons for maintain privacy. The audience for this paper is high school level teachers in a school with one-to-one devices for every student.
Instructional Setting, Audience, and Content Area
At High School One (a pseudonym) a rural 2A high school in Central Washington State. There are just over 1,000 students between 9th and 12th grade, with nearly 80% of the students identifying as white and just under 20% identifying as Hispanic. All students at High School One will be equipped with their own, school provided, Chromebook as part of the one-to-one implementation beginning with the 2016-17 school year. As this involves more than 1,000 students being connected to the internet for daily assignments, tests and score reporting, the ethical and legal issues of privacy are something teachers at High School One need to be aware of. In the 2016-17 school year, I will be teaching 152 students split between three sections of 10th grade World History and 11th grade U.S. History.
Ethical Reasons for Maintaining Confidentiality
While there are several legal reasons to maintain the privacy of students, there are also many ethical ones, such as not wanting to expose students to embarrassing disclosures or discrimination. For example, teachers at High School One have access to student data concerning health issues. I have had student who experience seizures, who have diabetes, and rare allergies. While
You have asked that I look into the state of privacy and ethics at Google and present my thoughts and opinion on it. I would like to address a few issues that I have found in the following paragraphs.
While interpreting Should We Ditch the Idea of Privacy? by Don Tapscott, I had found that this article was my favorite. When it comes to choosing is one should stay private or keep their information public, I feel like that is up to that individual one hundred percent. In Should We Ditch the Idea of Privacy? Tapscott went over how many people should be more open and post more information on the internet to allow others to get a sense of what is going on. He believed Facebook is a “leading social-media site that promotes information sharing” making everyone’s life an open book for everyone to read and learn from. Additionally, to help is one is struggling with any mental health issues. Tapscott believes that by sharing personal information can
This whole process has been put in place to keep citizens from having their privacy violated, but since its creation, the fourth amendment has been altered. One of the alterations deals with the reduction of public schools students’ Fourth Amendment rights while on public school campuses. This reduction has been put in place for the safety of students and school staff. Because schools are meant to be a safe place for children, school administrators are given the authority to search any student who is suspected of violating school rules with less evidence required than that of a police officer to complete a search or seizure. The administrator only requires reasonable suspicion to search a student. Reasonable suspicion requires some facts but less hard evidence than probable cause.
Privacy is a very important right given through the 4th Amendment. Being free is what being a U.S. citizen is about. Privacy is the act of being free from disturbance and public sight. Private things that are promised in the Constitution are homes, cars, and papers. A student’s rights to privacy are different. They are the same from kindergarten until they graduate. “School officials need not obtain a warrant before searching a student who is under their authority; rather, a search of a student need only be reasonable under all the circumstances.” (“What Does the Fourth Amendment,”
"We Need Privacy Laws for the Digital Era | The Nation." The Nation, 8 Jan. 2014. Web. 21 Oct. 2016.
Everyone should have their own privacy in order to secure our personal and business. Most people do not like when some stranger is keep looking at you anything you do and talk. In 1984, that is called Big Brother is watching you through the telescreen. Telescreen can always see and hear whatever people are doing and privacy setting. There are no such as privacy and secrets because telescreens were everywhere such as streets, houses and restrooms. In 1984, the main character is Winston Smith who works at Ministry of the Truth. He believed that privacy should have in his society which against with Big Brother. Winston can not write his journals because writing journals are illegal. Therefore he needed to hide his journals in the corner of his house where telescreen could not see it. It can be sentenced by death and put in the labor campus for 25 years when people in 1984 who write journals. The right of privacy is most important than national security because citizens should have freedom, government has no right to control people’s business and people would be unsafe, unsecured under strict government.
Retrieved July 2, 2016 from http://www.arkib.gov.my/web/guest/home Tessler, C. Z. (2014). Privacy, restriction, and access: legal and ethical dilemmas. SLIS Student Research Journal, 4(1). Retrieved July 2, 2016 from http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/slissrj/vol4/iss1/5
There is a concern about many users privacy worldwide. Technology is constantly upgrading and internet is being used daily worldwide. Laws are constantly changing and there are many concerns about this. In this essay, I will be talking about why
In “The Right of Privacy,” Richard Posner argues that, “the law should in general accord private business information greater protection than it accords personal information. Secrecy is an important method of appropriating social benefits to the entrepreneur who creates them while in private life it is more likely to conceal discreditable facts” (404). However, his argument is flawed, because it dehumanizes individuals, disregarding the value of their privacy in order to place the corporate world above their needs and rights.
Why are surveillance cameras used if it has a negative effect on people’s daily lives? People who do not want to remain watched by cameras and want to keep their lives private, view surveillance cameras as an invasion of privacy. Advancements of worldwide technology allow the usage of innovative surveillance cameras in public places. Even though, several people believe that surveillance cameras influence a safer environment; Other people believe that the disturbing surveillance cameras invade people’s privacy. Barry Steinhardt, the author of "Public Surveillance Cameras Violate Privacy Rights," Glenn Greenwald, the author of "Why Privacy Matters," and Laurent Belsie, the author of "Public Surveillance Cameras Violate Privacy," all agree that surveillance cameras in public places became a violation of privacy. It's unlikely that consensus will ever be reached regarding the use of surveillance cameras, but these authors all agree that surveillance cameras can affect people’s
As you could see in the above reflection of our privacy protection laws, currently, we do not have a direct cause of action for breach of privacy. However, I will explain other torts that may be available in court against the possible unlawful surveillance of you and your family.
The current controversy that needs addressing is a dating website has been asked to hand over user information to the public health department because of a STD outbreak on the site, even though their policy is against it. Normally, the health department needs a warrant to get this information but because the department is not able to the company that hosts the chatroom needs to make the decision to give out personal user information. The main proposal being presented is the company should give out the user’s personal information because if it does not the STD could continue to spread without the carriers even knowing. So, the department believes that for the betterment of public health it is okay to breach privacy in this instance.
Warrantless searches of a student’s person raise significant legal questions. Unlike locker searches, it cannot be asserted that there is a lower expectation of privacy. Students have a legitimate expectation of privacy in the contents of their pockets and their person. The Fifth Circuit noted: “The Fourth Amendment applies with its fullest vigor against any intrusion on the human body.” In personal searches, not only is it necessary to have reasonable cause to search, but also the search itself must be reasonable. Reasonableness is assessed in terms of the specific facts and circumstances of a case.
Privacy is an important aspect of one’s personality. It is based on the theory that everyone has the inviolability of the person. The concept of Privacy as a right has been studied for decades and many different definitions of privacy have been proposed by different scholars across various jurisdictions. Also, sociologists as well as psychologists agree that a person has a fundamental need for privacy. Most discussions about this extremely intricate subject take as their preliminary point the phrase ‘the right to be left alone’ coined by Cooley and adopted by Warren and Brandeis in a seminal Harvard Law Review article which has been held as providing the basis for the birth and
aimed at protecting their citizenry. The United States has not been left behind in the stampede to adopt such measures. One of the proposals which have been put forward as far as a means of safeguarding and protecting Americans is to allow the government, through its various security agencies, to collect data and have access to the American people’s mobile phones, social media accounts, and even emails.