REVIEW OF THE PROFILE OF CREATIVE ABILITIES
There are differences between Licensed Professional Counselor and Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist. Testing is a large factor in accurately assessing the full scope of the assistance a client may new. Depending on the needs of the client the Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist (LMFT) could be a better fit. In considering the tests that exist, one sample population LMFT’s are likely to work with are children. Development is always a major factor in children with intellectual or behavior issues. One test that is dynamic to this factor is the Profile of Creative Capabilities (PCA).
The Profile of Creative Capabilities (PCA) includes two subtests (Drawing and Groups) and 2
…show more content…
DEVELOPMENT. Growth and development of the PCA was led by Guilford's (1959) structure of intellect model and Amabile's (1996) theorizing on creativeness. The rating scale also rates intrinsic motivation.
TECHNICAL. The PCA was normed on the sample of 640 children across 11 states. The sample was stratified by three age times (5- to eight-11 9- to 11-11 12- to 14-11).
The exam manual states the standardization sample carefully approximates the U.S. population. The sample does seem to carefully match the U.S. Census when it comes to geographic region, race and Hispanic ethnicity, and parent education level. However, the standardization sample doesn't carefully match the U.S. Census when it comes to gender (e.g., 46% from the standardization sample are male whereas 51% from the U.S. school-age human population are male), and family earnings (30% from the sample possess a family earnings of $75,000 and also over whereas 19% of U.S. families come with an earnings within this upper range).
Evidence meant for construct validity was supplied by study of group differentiation across different cohorts. The creativity class weren't given the PCA pre-intervention, so it's impossible to understand if the test was calculating alterations in creative abilities or reflecting latent group variations in addition to the intervention. Further, it's unclear from the theoretical perspective, and never
Ian is a 5 year old Caucasian male that exhibits average verbal skills, average cognitive skills, and appeared to be of average height and weight. When entering his assessment, it was noted that his clothing did not match, his hair was unkempt and his mother seemed frazzled at best.
Outcome 1: Understand the concepts of creativity and creative learning and how these affect all aspects of young children’s learning and development.
An unhurried period of creativity gives children time to explore and experiment with materials and use them in their own way. It also allows children to do their best work by moving from popular to more original ideas and being able to come back to it at a later date to finish.
Cognition is the way people take in information and combine it while intelligence is the way people take in
Orange you glad I’m an orange? Oranges, according to various quizzes and charts, tend to be the most creative and artistic of the four personality types. When creativity comes to mind, I think of how much of an impact it has made one my life and my choices leading up to today.
For the entirety of the fall semester, I took on a project to create a three-page layout for a fictional campaign in National Geographic magazine about endangered species. The goal was to create different content for my portfolio, challenging my skills in photography and photo-manipulation. I transformed people into animals and used gel lighting and Photoshop to create my artwork (see Appendix A figure 1 & 2). At the end of the semester, I reviewed my completed pieces and two theorists best fit my creative process, Julie Burstein, and Teresa Amabile. Julie Burstein discusses the best way to foster creativity is by ‘letting go’ she outlines this in four lessons (Campbell and Dubois, “Artist Best practices” 25). These lessons include experiences, challenges, limitations and loss (Campbell and Dubois, “Artist Best practices” 25). While Teresa Amabile discusses how the theory of creativity is fostered through her componential model of creativity (Campbell and Dubois, “On theories of” 14). These include domain-relevant skills, creative thinking skills and motivation (Campbell and Dubois, “On theories of” 14). Both of these theorists go hand in hand providing me with the framework for my best work. This essay will discuss how Amabile’s theory for intrinsic motivation and Burstein’s lesson of experience and loss, align in my creative process to be conducive to my work.
The subjects of the test were children between the ages of three to seven years
IQ is defined as a measure of intelligence that shows the ratio of an individual’s mental age to their chronological age, this is then multiplied by 100 (Cattel 1972). Creativity cannot be measured by undertaking an IQ test, creativity is subjective and the simplest way of defining it is the ability to create original, useful and surprising new things. However, over the years pioneering research has inspired psychologists to devise tests to measure creativity. The most famous Divergent Thinking test is Guildfords Alternative Uses Task established in 1967. This test proposes that the individual involved should think of alternative uses for a common item such as a brick. This way of measuring Divergent Thinking is universally used in contemporary testing of creativity.
This study was done on 198 children ages 3 to 6.5 years old from two schools in the Pacific Northwestern, and two schools from Midwest in the United States (Coyne et al., 2016). According to Coyne, Linder, Rasmussen, Nelson, & Birkbeck (2016) study results:
Today’s education system has become focused on standardized intelligence testing and what works best for the majority. This system, although created to help the masses, is impersonal and only benefits a specific group of students who learn the best through testing. Those students who think creatively and use imagination are left behind. This is why intelligence tests are not accurate measurement of a child’s knowledge as it does not account for creativity and the child’s individual strengths. Changes need to be made within the school system. Instead of focusing on what is “correct” schools should be encouraging problem-solving through the process of making mistakes and failing. This challenges a student to learn about themselves and the world around them. When everything is already laid out for them it is easy to follow. There is no single way of thinking. By making a student have to think on their own it stimulates creativity and allows them to better connect concepts to real world situations.
Again, the dark laughter echoed in her head. Shit, shit, shit. She was so damn stupid, so bloody arrogant. In spite of the sunglasses she wore to lessen the risk of overstimulation to her senses, the lenses were no safeguards against the weighted stares of the people on the bus, and Tung wasn’t here acting as a buffer.
One study used a measurement of interviewing the parent and child, along with different questionnaires, to analyze creative potential and its relationship with having an imaginary companion, if there were any gender differences, and whether children would be more likely to have a negative self-image. M. Taylor interviewed both children and their parents and demonstrated that the parents of younger children seemed more aware of their child having an imaginary companion, while only 20% of parents with children aged 6 to 7 knew, supporting study by Hurlock (1932). As cited in Manosevitz, a study done by Schmechel found direct questioning of the child about their imaginary companions had a higher occurrence (50%) compared to parental report (31%) (Manosevitz, 1977). Further suggesting that parental report alone is not affective in measurement of the presence of imaginary companions. In addition to the interview multiple questionnaires including the Activity Questionnaire, Creative Functioning Test, the Unusual Uses test, Self-Image Inventory, and a questionnaire about imaginary companions were administered. Results found that having an imaginary companion was related to two out of three estimates of creative potential, contrary to Manosevitz findings, and having an imaginary companion was correlated with a lower self-image (Hoff, 2005). Although having an imaginary companion was associated with a lower self-image, that self-image is still among average for those who
The term creativity is used for the purpose of describing the ability that is concerned with the process of creating something new or valuable. This ability allows a person to surpass the rules, practices, methods, forms or similar kind of activities that the traditional society may be performing at that time. Creativity is one of the most important things that have allowed the people of the society to move forward and urge for development. All the development that has been made in various aspects of human life can be directly connected with the creativity. All the industry leaders of the world have secured this place because of the level of creativity and innovation that they showed. They used this creativity for creating something new that has allowed them to develop completely new methods for this purpose.
Guilford thru-out his studies and observations of people identified that people preferred either divergent or convergent types of thinking. His theory associated creativity more so with divergent thinking. During his studies, he witnessed creative people displaying divergent thinking characteristics more often than those that were less creative. These characteristics included: fluency, the ability to produce a great number of ideas in a short period of time; originality, the ability to produce new and original ideas; flexibility, the ability to propose a variety of approaches to one specific problem; and elaboration, the ability to organize the details and systematically carry them out. Divergent thinking incites people to be more resourceful in developing their own solutions to problems, thinking more outside of the box. Divergent thinking allows an individual to access their memory in addition to an external knowledge base, allowing the identification of many different alternative solutions to a certain problem, looking beyond the status quo for solutions, potentially to the point of overlooking the positive, aspects of the existing system.
Change, creativity and innovation are essential elements for survival and growth of an organization. Creativity is vital for the birth of fresh and beneficial ideas. Creative thinking allows groups and individuals to solve problems or stimulate to think differently in order to bring forth fruitful ideas. The above mentioned creative thinking enabled our team of six different personalities to come together and implement a plan to solve a complex problem in a hospital. Our assigned task was to recommend a plan in order to alleviate hospital readmission among elderly population within thirty days of discharge. In this paper the author is narrating the team dynamics, functionalities and personal competencies in the process of recommending a change in the system. As a member in the innovation leadership team the author is also reflecting on the assessment, capacity for innovation in the organization which is the hospital where the team is assigned.