By changing the frequency of payouts and tying the bonus amount to be paid to the profit margin employees would not factor it into their monthly budgets, decreasing the likelihood that they feel entitled to the additional income, and further give greater motivation for the employees to increase production in an effort to increase profits and ultimately their bonus. Further, tying the bonus to the profit made during the time frame decided upon would not be as complicated of a figure to explain to the employees. Like any company, Engstrom would likely track profit and loss on a frequent if not weekly basis, this information could be made available for all employees to see, perhaps in a breakroom information board or somewhere that employees could …show more content…
Have a one-on one meeting with the employees and leaders of the departments that are not meeting expectations to provide additional training, corrective actions, or otherwise work together with that particular team to develop a plan to improve, which would further empower the teams (Newstrom, 2015). For the teams who are meeting production goals in their department develop a rewards and recognition program so that the department or specific employees who have gone above and beyond could be recognized. This monthly awards and recognition program could replace the monthly financial bonus by providing another type of motivational and reward factor, which could be understood through the Equity Model, in which the employees would still see reward outcomes from their monthly inputs, in addition to the potential of a financial bonus (Newstrom, …show more content…
Make sure the employees feel connected to their team, when they don’t feel valued it will impact their performance. Learn and challenge the employees to strive for better which will keep them productive. Provide security in their position to combat negative performance. Give voice and recognition which will empower employees and make them feel appreciated. Ensure all employees are being treated with fairness by communicating and leading effectively. Empower the employees to be able to make choices and decisions that can impact production, allow them to see their recommendations in action, and above all else, provide a clear sense of purpose. The goal here for the employees is to increase production to levels that will earn them a bonus, but ultimately the goal needs to be recognized as the success of the Engstrom plant to ensure job growth, steady income for its employees (Taylor, 2013).
By taking the steps above not only could Engstrom develop a clear communication channel between employees and management, but redevelop the trust between the two, which will lead to a more cohesive work environment, and thus increased production and profits. Communication and trust tend to go hand in hand; one does not exist without
Communication: Leaders and executive must gain employee trust and confidence and communicate the execution strategy and share the expected results.
Recognizing employees for accomplishments such as finishing a major project, reaching sales targets or providing excellent customer service can be an important motivating factor. Set goals for workers to strive for and offer rewards for reaching them. This could be in the form of an employee of the month scheme, a bonus, or a promotion. Some companies conduct meetings where employees are recognised for good work in front of their colleagues. This can help motivate all the workers in the business to strive for success.
One of the main issues that the plant faced is the fact that there is no more understanding between the employees and management. They blamed each other. Management blamed the employees for the low productivity and the employees accused them of being devious with the bonus calculation (Michael Beer, 2008). As a result, the communication flow between them is broken. Management failed to effectively perform their duties as leaders of the plant. As one of the solution to this problem, the plant could benefit from using the supportive model. According to Newstrom, management who use this model support their employees in their work. Also, they provide tools to help them grow and accomplish things in the interest of the company (Newstorm, 2015). As a result, this would give the employees the feeling that
There could be a few options Dax and Mark could incorporate, but the employees may not like them. Hours could be lessened, benefits could be reduced, or insurance premiums could be raised. Any three of these ideas could make any employee angry just to receive their yearly bonus. However, It seems many companies are cutting back on their yearly bonuses because of loss, cutbacks, and the slow economy. Mark and Dex could hold a meeting explaining the issue and what is going on inside the company then give the employees options to choose from so they feel they have a say in what happens to their pay. Having an option makes an employee
When the employees sweat out to reach the production targets, they give their best and the mind-set or the attitude of the employees towards the organization changes. The management should set up monthly workshops to interact with their employees, thus making the employees feel that the management is well within their reach and is ready to listen to their pleas. Organizing such workshops will stimulate the feedback process which will help the management to cut down on production and sales costs in turn maximising the returns (Arnolds & Boshoff, 2002). Organizing technical trips and field tours further improves the management employee relationship as this allows the two parties to work together in a different environment and gain better ideas. The concepts of the ERG (existence, relatedness, growth) Model can be applied by recognizing individual employees who attain the highest productivity and then rewarding them with various benefits such as growth. Growth is what employees look for in any organization as the more
Engstrom should provide a space in which workforce can communicate by having managers listen to them and asking them questions. People generally know the right answers if they have the opportunity to produce them. For Engstrom creating teams and committees with members from each production department to management is important. A committee can help improve the line workers morale with ideas such as improvement for production, and meeting delivery deadlines. A committee of managers from each department within the plant who will work with plant line workers to make suggestions and improvements for employee morale and improvement. The teams formed should be from all functions and staffed with members whose talents match team tasks. Committees are
Give employees the level of energy, commitment, and creativity that they can add to jobs.
At the Engstrom Company there were many underlying issues that were truly affecting the company’s productivity and morale. When two of the most important factors in any organization are failing, it is nearly impossible for the company to stay afloat. Therefore,
The key components to developing effective Reward Strategy is to ensure that there are clearly defined goals to meet business objectives, that the reward programme meets the needs of both the organisation and its employees, and to ensure that this is then supported by effective HR policies. In order to ensure these criteria are met there are a number of factors which influence how reward strategy is developed which include both internal factors within the organisation itself, as well as external factors outside the organisation.
Supervisors must understand the incentive pay process in order to support and administer it. Oftentimes, a lack of understanding causes managers to ignore or adapt the process as they see fit. Moreover, if supervisors are not trained on how to measure performance, the process will not be standardized across the company. (Gordon, Kaswin)
Reward Management (RM) has been defined as the distribution of monetary and non-monetary rewards to employees in an effort to align the interests of the employees, the organisation, and its shareholders (O’Neil, 1998). In addition O’Neil (1998) also suggests that a RM system can serve the purpose of attracting prospective job applicants, retaining valuable employees, motivating employees, ensuring legal requirements relating to direct and indirect rewards are not violated, assisting the company in achieving human resource and business objectives, and ultimately assisting the organisation in obtaining a competitive advantage.
Currently there is no formal incentive system. Many of the rewards are based on Berardi’s perception of employee performance. If he does not have the opportunity to have direct communication with all employees, it is a possibility that he is not able to appropriately assess individual performances. The employees themselves felt that “above-standard performance was not always noted.” This sometimes resulted in sub-optimal achievements being recognized while the employee going the extra mile was getting passed over.
Every human being needs motivation now and then. Incentives and recognition programs can support you in helping your employees become happier and more productive at work. As a leader, one of the main things to think about is how to recognize an employee for a performance that has exceeded expectations, objectives and goals. Therefore, I would like to introduce you in this paper to some ideas that hopefully would promote this method as one of the main priorities in today's and tomorrow's workplace.
To motivate employees to work towards reaching organizational goals, managers frequently depend on some form of enticement. Beyond monetary compensation, awards and additional types of acknowledgment can be given, and the ability to choose a work schedule is a possibility. A reasonable pay system, which would be an incentive for individuals and groups to achieve organizational goals, is a hardship manager’s face (Jones & George, 2011). Within the company that I work for, every quarter awards are presented to Customer Service Agents who have maintained a 95 percent or above quality score. Monetary awards are given out as well as time off coupons.
Aguinis (2013) discusses that fact that team-based organizations do not necessarily outperform work teams or teams in general. A reward system we learn, should not only target individual performance, but teams as a whole (p. 295). An ideal performance management system includes such characteristics as strategic and context congruence, thoroughness, the ability to identify effective and ineffective performance, inclusiveness, standardization and ethicality. The reward system applied to the State of Georgia, exhibits many similar characteristics of an ideal