preview

Cuban Revolution Source Analysis

Decent Essays

After analysing all of the source’s mentioned above, it is evident that all three authors have very diverse perspectives on the Cuban Revolution. Whilst it may seem to Source A’s audience that the author (Alistair Cooke) is simply trying to inform the American public of Castro’s leadership after examination, it seems as though they are trying to brainwash readers into rebelling against Castro. Thus, the Source is considered anti- Castro. Comparatively, in Source B, Herbert L. Matthews reports on an exclusive interview with Castro’s best lieutenants, Major Che Guevara to present the audience an anecdote which portrays a strong sense of patriotism, pride and authority which are all factors that present the audience with Matthews pro- Castro perspective. Additionally, Source C’s perspective is also in Castro’s favour as the Source is secondary and means that the author could see the context of the situation without being restricted by any element of bias. Meaning that, he was able to see all the events that occurred after Castro took over …show more content…

Source A highlights multiple times of Castro’s inability to lead a country through the description of Castro’s attack in the Source “whose first putsch against the island on December 1, 1956, left him with only twelve of the original force of 93 men.” Alistair Cooke, depicts Castro as weak and presents the audience with the notion that Castro does not have the leadership skills required to be in charge of Cuba, as he does not even have the qualities possessed to lead his troops. This is intentionally used to sway the audience against Castro However, In Source B, Herbert L. Matthews portrays Castro as strong and possess attributes which show leadership. This is shown through Source B highlighting Castro’s relationship with his soldiers “They were brought back to restore order and discipline among troops and officers who were undecided on what to

Get Access