Case 9-4 Needsspace Essay

b. What medium would you use to reach each of these parties and what would your relative resource allocation be to each?

Sparkle Company is a Nigerian diamond mining company. Sparkle is a joint venture, 50 percent owned by Shine and 50 percent owned by Brighten. Both Shine and Brighten are U.S.-based companies with their functional currency being the American dollar. Sparkle Companies functional currency is that of Nigeria, being the Naira. During 2009, Sparkle had several transactions with its joint venture owners and outside parties. The details of Sparkle’s transactions are three loans, three expenditures, and one revenue stream. The loans the company took out were $1 million from Brighten, $1 million from Shine, and 300 million Naira from a local Nigerian bank. The expenditures

ASC 320-10-35-33F: “Changes in the quality of the credit enhancement should be considered when estimating whether a credit loss exists and the period over which the debt security is expected to recover.”

This case is talking about an executive retreat. It was introduced by John Matthews who was a executive had been selected to attend the two-and-a-half-week retreat. The retreat was more like a competition about academic and athletic. The team members should not only get know each other and cooperate with teammates but also need to compete with others. The whole participants were broken into five groups and their aim was to win the competition. There are several sessions about academic and athletic that the participants should complete. After the introduction part the case showed the experience of John. Before the group meeting John was wondering and worried about this retreat. When he was taking the first group meeting, he tried to learn

The third and final question from the case is how would the lease classification change under U.S. GAAP. The FASB codification that deals with leases is ASC 840. U.S. GAAP classifies leases as operating leases or capital leases and it has a section for sale-leaseback transactions as well. Under U.S. GAAP, the lease in this case would be classified as a capital lease. This is because ASC 840-10-25-29 says, “If at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease.” This lease meets two of those criterions. The lease term is equal to 75% of the economic life of the equipment (3 year lease term / 4 year economic life of equipment = .75 or 75%) and the present value of the minimum lease payments “equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the lease property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor” (ASC 840-10-25-1d). The present value of the minimum lease payments does in fact equal or exceed 90 percent of the fair value of the equipment ($248,690 / $265,000 = .94 or 94%). Under ASC 840-10-25-31, the lessee should use the implicit rate to calculate the present value of the lease payments because the lessee already

The next type of lease is the financial lease. This lease does not include a maintenance fee and this type of lease is like a rent to own when the lease is paid in full the ownership is transferred to the organization.

On a snowy January evening, the Midwestern Medical Group (MMG) management team held a retirement party for Judith Olsen, MMG president. During the evening, Olsen reflected back on the years she had worked for MMG with mixed feelings about her experience. Over the course of their eight-year integration

Read Rush Johnson Farms Inc. v. Missouri Farms Association, 555 S.W.2d 61 and post a draft case study to the discussion board. Identify the Facts, Issue, Holding, Reasoning and Disposition. Case study #1 will be due week 3. This exercise will help you work through the reading a case prior to receiving a grade. Use the LEXIS NEXIS database through the Webster library to access the case.

Shakespeare Inc., a private publishing company issued its F/S on March 20, 2012. There were several accruals and events that the management of Shakespeare is considering to determine if they should be recognized or disclosed in Dec 31, 2011 F/S. In my opinion, the important things to focus on subsequent events are the period they effect and if their influence is material or not, so that in conclusion, the F/S are fairly presented.

Alabama Residential Lease Agreement, a legal instrument is binding on both the landlord and the tenant upon its execution. The nature of this lease agreement offers tenure of term mutually agreed between both parties. The agreement has 33 subsections comprising the terms and conditions of the tenancy. Both parties executing this lease agreement must review them carefully prior to accepting and signing. The tenant may require to make additional non-refundable deposit as and when applicable like in situations when the tenant proposes to keep pets on the premises. Notarization of this Alabama Residential Lease Agreement is not necessary.

Lessor failed to follow the lease agreement considering security deposit; lessor did not give lessee 24 hours’ notice of showing apartment for rental; lessor agree to repairs to the interior and exterior of the building; lessor did not give lessee 30 days written notice of any default or breach. Lessor shall have the right to enter the leased premises for inspection at all reasonable hours and whenever necessary to make repairs and alterations of the apartment or apartment building, or to clean the apartment. Lessor assured the repairs will be taken care of quickly, however, she failed to make any repairs. Lessee notified lessor of the defects in the

(Revised and updated 5/2013) Jack leases an office building from Jill. The lease is classified as an operating lease under the guidance of ASC Topic 840, Leases. The lease does not include any renewal options upon the expiration, but Jack is in the process of negotiating an extension of the lease. Jack proposes to make a single up-front payment of $1.2 million to Jill in exchange for an extension of the lease at the current rate for another 10 years. The extension would create a new lease under ASC par. 9 of 840-10-35-4. 1. 2. Should Jack include the $1.2 million in the calculation of the minimum lease payments when classifying the new lease? Assuming the new lease

On a monthly basis he will replace air filters, inspect the grounds, and make notes of the complete physical condition of the property. The tenant will have sufficient time to remedy the notice and will be fined daily until the issue has been resolved. John will drive by the property frequently for visual inspections of the property and will be readily available in the event the tenant has any repair needs.

The lease is not registered and being a one-year lease, it is protected as an exception to the indefeasibility principle as a short-term lease under the relevant statutes except the Law of Property Act 1936 (SA). There is no need to execute a lease and the agreement may take effect via an oral agreement.

The new accounting standard IFRS 16 on leases is different in IAS 17 in many aspects. The adaption of this new IFRS will be applicable from 1st of Jan 2019. The thoroughly discussed standard has made attempt to bring the single model of accounting for Lessee the will discourage the off balance sheet financing and the on-balancing sheet reporting will be enhanced. However, on the Lessor end the accounting model has