The income inequality in the US.
Explanation of Solution
Table -1 shows the distribution of US income by households in 2008:
Table -1
Personal Income Category | Percentage of all households in this category |
Under $10,000 | 7.1 |
$10,000-$14,999 | 5.8 |
$15,000-$24,999 | 11.8 |
$25,000-$34,999 | 10.9 |
$35,000-$49,999 | 14.0 |
$50,000-$99,999 | 17.9 |
$100,000 and above | 11.9 |
20.5 | |
100.0 |
As per table -1, the highest 20% have received an income share of 50% in 2008. This is ten times more than the 3.4% than the lowest 20% received. The three quintiles in the middle get less that 50% of the total income before tax. When we combine the bottom three quintiles on top of two quintiles that receive almost twice of them. So, the fact is that the top to 20% are receiving as much as 80% at the bottom.
The government's effect on the income distribution happens through taxes and transfer payments. It has a slightly progressive effect of federal, state, and local taxes on distribution of income as people with a high income have a pay of a higher percentage of their income in taxes when compared to people with a lower income. The main contribution of the government for income equality happens through transfer programs i.e. 80% of the times. The benefit of this contribution goes mainly to people in the lowest quintile where 75% of the income that these people earn is through government transfer payments.
Though these statistics may suggest that the government is contributing heavily to equalize the income, it might be all correct. As the transfer programs provided to people with a lower income decrease the incentive to work so the income earned will be further down. Also, not all these transfer programs got to the poor. For example, in case of subsidies, farming always goes to the farmers that are wealthy. Middle and higher class students get the benefit of education funding by the government than the ones with a lower income.
Concept Introduction:
Income inequality: It is the unequal distribution of a household or an individual income across the various participants in an economy.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 23 Solutions
Economics (Irwin Economics)
- Wealth, earnings, and disposable income are just three of several ways of looking at inequality. Imagine a household that earns $80,000 per year from labor. In that year, it also receives an income of $3,000 from investments, pays $12,000 in tax, and receives $7,000 in transfers from the state. Which of the following is its market income and its disposable income? O $83,000; $71,000. O $83,000 $78,000. O $80,000; $68,000. O $80,000; $75,000. Jarrow_forwardAs income transfer programs accompanying the War on Poverty increased beginning in the latter half of the 1960s, what happened to poverty in the United States? Check all that apply. O The adjusted poverty rate has declined rapidly and is now less than half of the official poverty rate. O The poverty rate declined substantially in the period before the War on Poverty, but not in the period after the start of the War on Poverty. O In 2018, the adjusted poverty rate was only 4 percentage points lower than the official rate in 1970. O The War on Poverty has been largely ineffective in reducing the rate of poverty in the United States.arrow_forwardExplain how a country may experience greater equality in the distribution of income, yet still experience high rates of poverty. Hint: Look at the Clear It Up 'How do governments measure poverty in low-income countries?' and compare to Table 15.5.arrow_forward
- Consider the following table that gives the monthly per capita consumption expenditure of 10 households with poverty line given as $500 per month. Poverty Gap is %. Monthly per capita consumption expenditure (in $) of 10 households 5 400 300 1000 2500 4 9 400 950 2 3 6 7 8 10 Country A 900 1200 505 100 O a 40 O b. 13 O c. 27 O d. 16arrow_forwardQ7.1) The following question refers to income inequality and the Lorenz curve. Answer the question below: - Does it matter if some people are much richer than others?- Who are the top 1 percent in income and what are the effects of demography on socialinequality in various regions of the world today?- Why has income inequality worsened?- Does wealth distribution follow a similar pattern from generation to generation? What do experts say is the best way to shrink the wealth gap?arrow_forward10. Consider the following distribution of income in a 12-person economy, with the modern urban wage 3, the traditional rural income = 1, and the informal urban wage = 2: (1,1,1,1,2,2,2,2,3,.3,3,3). The poverty line through expanded agricultural exports. What happens to relative inequality? Absolute poverty? Calculate the Ahluwalia-Chenery welfare index for terciles (3 fractiles) under GNP weights and equal weights. Why is the equal-weighted index higher? 1.25. Suppose rural incomes are raised to 1.5arrow_forward
- Show instructions Question 1 Income poverty is about the lack of access to the basic rights of food, clothes and shelter, education, proper health care, clean water -- rights that most of us take for grante ○ True O False Question 2 ( Population is not a direct cause of poverty, but it does compound the problem of poverty. True O False Question 3 Income levels do not necessarily reflect levels of poverty. O True O False Questions 1-10 of 10 | Page 1 of 1 Question 4 War is perhaps the most devastating and serious cause of poverty. O True O False Question 5 The World Bank has established an international poverty line of $10 a day per person in 1985 purchasing power parity (PPP) prices. O True O False Question 6 Analysts have found a strong positive relationship between economic growth and poverty reduction. O True O False Question 7 Most of the world's poor live in South Asia. True O Falsearrow_forward5. Describe the reasons behind the new attention to the issue of income inequality in the United States.arrow_forwardExplain why the poverty gap ratio is the better target measure of poverty than the head- count ratio. Use diagrams to substantiate your answer. larrow_forward
- IM R %24 How does progressive taxation and redistribution policies affect the Lorenz curve and Gini coefficient? O The Lorenz curve becomes less curved and the Gini coefficient increases. O The Lorenz curve becomes less curved and the Gini coefficient decreases. O The Lorenz curve becomes more curved and the Gini coefficient increases. O The Lorenz curve becomes more curved and the Gini coefficient decreases. 10:44 PM earch 13 12/12/2021 ins prt sc f12 delete 114 144 Po backspace lock 4. 7. home enter 7. 4. K. pause 1 shift ctrlarrow_forward3. Comparing Gini coefficients of different countries Aa Aa The following diagram shows the Lorenz curves for three countries. Country X's Lorenz curve is shown in blue, Country Y's Lorenz curve is shown in red, and Country Z's Lorenz curve is shown in green. Region I is the area above Country X's Lorenz curve and below the 45-degree line. Region II is the area below Country X's Lorenz curve and above Country Y's Lorenz curve. Region III is the area below Country Y's Lorenz curve and above Country Z's Lorenz curve. Region IV is the area below Country Z's Lorenz curve. INCOME (Cumulative percent) 100 80 60 40 20 0 The Gini coefficient for Country Z is given by Couny X 20 Country Y Country Z 11 III 60 IV 40 100 HOUSEHOLDS (Cumulative percent) 80 has the highest Gini coefficient.arrow_forwardThe government announces programs designed to reduce the share of income going to the top quintile from 60% to 20%. You predict that the most likely result is that: O mean household income will fall, because the highest income earners will earn less and work less. median household income will rise, because some of the 40% of redistributed income will be transferred to the third quintile. after redistribution, each quintile will receive 20% of total wealth. O the lowest quintile will receive the 40% taken from the top quintile and switch places.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStaxPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning