The difference between the cooperative game and non-cooperative game.
Explanation of Solution
In a cooperative game, players communicate and arrange binding contracts where both parties must adhere with the agreement must adhere. If there is no formal communication in coordinating each other’s actions, it is a non-cooperative game. In a non-cooperative game, even though the players act independently, they are aware of other’s existence and know the payoffs of each other. A joint venture or a formal cartel agreement such as OPEC is an example of a cooperative game. Non cooperative game typically happens in the R&D (Research and Development) where the companies contest to obtain a patent.
Cooperative game: Cooperative game is the game which the players formally communicate and arrange the binding contracts.
Non-cooperative game: Non-cooperative game is the game which the players does not communicate or arrange the binding contracts but is well aware of the existence and payoffs each other.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 13 Solutions
Microeconomics (9th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
- What is the difference, if any, between a dominant strategy and a Nash equilibrium? Give examples.arrow_forwardFor the game below, find any Nash equilibrium. Show your work and report any Nash equilibrium strategies.arrow_forwardImagine a small town with three car repair shops competing for a limited number of customers. Explain why the three shops working together to keep their prices high is unlikely to be a Nash equilibrium.arrow_forward
- Find any Nash equilibria in the game below. Firm B Co-operate Don’t co-operate Firm A Co-operate 60 60 0 80 Don’t co-operate 80 0 10 10 a. There is one Nash equilibrium: both firms don't co-operate. b. There are no Nash equilibria. c. There are two Nash equilibria: one firm co-operates and the other firm doesn't co-operate. d. There are two Nash equilibria: (i) both firms co-operate and (ii) both firms don't co-operate.arrow_forwardFind any Nash equilibria in the game below. Firm B Co-operate Don’t co-operate Firm A Co-operate 60 60 0 80 Don’t co-operate 80 0 10 10 Answer a. There is one Nash equilibrium: both firms don't co-operate. b. There are no Nash equilibria. c. There are two Nash equilibria: one firm co-operates and the other firm doesn't co-operate. d. There are two Nash equilibria: (i) both firms co-operate and (ii) both firms don't co-operate.arrow_forwardIn game theory, what is a subgame? What is a subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium? If possible, could you please provide an example? Thank you!arrow_forward
- why is a nash equilibrium stablearrow_forwardUse the following normal-form game to answer the following questions. a. For what values of x is strategy D (strictly) dominant for player 2? b. For what values of x is strategy B (strictly) dominant for player 1? c. For what values of x is (B, D) the only Nash equilibrium of the game?arrow_forwardFrom your own understanding on the concept of “Game Theory”, what can you conclude about the relationship between rules of the game and the outcome that results?arrow_forward
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, IncManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781285165875Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of Microeconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305971493Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningPrinciples of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning