cgbpdw-coatwork-annotated

.pdf

School

University of Houston *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1301

Subject

Industrial Engineering

Date

Oct 30, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

162

Uploaded by BaronKnowledge37615

Report
Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe, Branch-Price-and-Cut Marco L¨ubbecke · OR Group · RWTH Aachen University, Germany @mluebbecke @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 1/86
Prerequisites you already know modeling with integer variables basic facts about polyhedra how the simplex algorithm works a bit about linear programming duality have seen some cutting planes and know what they are good for know the branch-and-bound algorithm
Goals of this Unit introduce you to the column generation and branch-and-price algorithms with the aim of expanding your modeling (!) capabilities which may result in stronger formulations for specially structured problems to ultimately help you solving such problems faster
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The Cutting Stock Problem image source: commons.wikimedia.org , Leeco Steel - Antonio Rosset @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 4/86
The Cutting Stock Problem: Kantorovich (1939, 1960) m rolls of length L Z + , n orders of length i Z + , and demand d i Z + , i [ n ] := { 1 , . . . , n } a minimum number of rolls has to be cut into orders; from each order i we need d i pieces in total min m j =1 y j // minimize number of used rolls s . t . m j =1 x ij = d i i [ n ] // every order has to be cut suf fi ciently often n i =1 i x ij L j [ m ] // do not exceed rolls’ lengths x ij d i y j i [ n ] , j [ m ] // we can only cut rolls that we use x ij Z + i [ n ] , j [ m ] // how often to cut order i from roll j y j { 0 , 1 } j [ m ] // whether or not to use roll j @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 5/86
The Cutting Stock Problem: Gilmore & Gomory (1961) how do solutions look like? how can we possibly cut one roll the set P of (encodings of) all feasible cutting patterns is P = a 1 . . . a n Z n + | n i =1 i a i L for each p P , denote by a ip Z + how often order i is cut in pattern p @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 6/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The Cutting Stock Problem: Gilmore & Gomory (1961) for each p P , denote by a ip Z + how often order i is cut in pattern p build a model on these observations, based on entire con fi gurations λ p Z + p P // how often to cut pattern p ? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 7/86
The Cutting Stock Problem: Gilmore & Gomory (1961) for each p P , denote by a ip Z + how often order i is cut in pattern p build a model on these observations, based on entire con fi gurations s.t. p P a ip λ p = d i i [ n ] // cover all demands λ p Z + p P // how often to cut pattern p ? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 7/86
The Cutting Stock Problem: Gilmore & Gomory (1961) for each p P , denote by a ip Z + how often order i is cut in pattern p build a model on these observations, based on entire con fi gurations min p P λ p // minimimize number of patterns used s.t. p P a ip λ p = d i i [ n ] // cover all demands λ p Z + p P // how often to cut pattern p ? this is an integer program with maany variables // in contrast to Kantorovich’s formulation, this model does not precisely specify which rolls to actually use @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 7/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Why would we care about different Models? image source: twitter.com , @MurrietaPD @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 8/86
Overview 1 Column Generation 2 Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation 3 Branch-Price-and-Cut 4 Dual View
Column Generation to solve a Linear Program we want to solve a linear program, the master problem (MP) z MP = min j J c j λ j s.t. j J a j λ j b λ j 0 j J typically, | J | super huge @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 10/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Column Generation to solve a Linear Program but we solve a linear program, the restricted master problem (RMP), with J J z RMP = min j J c j λ j s.t. j J a j λ j b λ j 0 j J typically, | J | super huge, | J | small @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 10/86
Column Generation to solve a Linear Program but we solve a linear program, the restricted master problem (RMP), with J J z RMP = min j J c j λ j s.t. j J a j λ j b [ π ] λ j 0 j J typically, | J | super huge, | J | small use e.g., simplex method to obtain optimal primal λ and optimal dual π for RMP @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 10/86
Column Generation to solve a Linear Program but we solve a linear program, the restricted master problem (RMP), with J J z RMP = min j J c j λ j s.t. j J a j λ j b [ π ] λ j 0 j J typically, | J | super huge, | J | small use e.g., simplex method to obtain optimal primal λ and optimal dual π for RMP is λ an optimal solution to the MP as well? // maybe we are lucky! @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 10/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Column Generation to solve a Linear Program but we solve a linear program, the restricted master problem (RMP), with J J z RMP = min j J c j λ j s.t. j J a j λ j b [ π ] λ j 0 j J typically, | J | super huge, | J | small use e.g., simplex method to obtain optimal primal λ and optimal dual π for RMP is λ an optimal solution to the MP as well? // maybe we are lucky! suf fi cient optimality condition: non-negative reduced cost ¯ c j = c j π t a j 0 , j J @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 10/86
Na¨ ı ve Idea for an Algorithm: Explicit Pricing checking the reduced cost (to identify a promising variable, if any) is called pricing algorithm column generation with explicit pricing input: restricted master problem RMP with an initial set J J of variables; output: optimal solution λ to the master problem MP; repeat solve RMP to optimality, obtain λ and π ; compute all ¯ c j = c j π t a j , j J ; // computationally prohibitive if there is a variable λ j with ¯ c j < 0 then J J { j } ; until all variables λ j , j J , have ¯ c j 0 ; @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 11/86
Better Idea: Implicit Pricing instead: solve an auxiliary optimization problem, the pricing problem z = min { ¯ c j | j J } if z < 0 , we set J J arg min j J { ¯ c j } and re-optimize the restricted master problem otherwise, i.e., z 0 , there is no j J with ¯ c j < 0 and we proved that we solved the master problem to optimality @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 12/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The Column Generation Algorithm algorithm column generation input: restricted master problem RMP with an initial set J J of variables; output: optimal solution λ to the master problem MP; repeat solve RMP to optimality, obtain λ and π ; solve z = min { ¯ c j | j J } ; if z < 0 then J J { j } with ¯ c j = z ; // add variable λ j to RMP until z 0 ; @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 13/86
Example: Cutting Stock: Restricted Master Problem solve LP relaxation of Gilmore & Gomory formulation min p P λ p s.t. p P a ip λ p = d i [ π i ] i [ n ] // one dual variable per order/demand λ p 0 p P with P P = { ( a 1 , . . . , a n ) t Z n + | n i =1 i a i L } a subset of variables obtain optimal primal λ and optimal dual π t = ( π 1 , . . . , π n ) // solving a linear program, we always obtain both, optimal primal and optimal dual solutions @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 14/86
Example: Cutting Stock: Reduced Cost optimal dual π t = ( π 1 , . . . , π n ) reduced cost of λ p // that formula again! it must be important. . . ¯ c p = 1 ( π 1 , . . . , π n ) · a 1 p a 2 p . . . a np for all feasible cutting patterns p P again: explicit enumeration of all patterns is totally out of the question // it does not seem that we are making good progress @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 15/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Cutting Stock: Pricing Problem implicit enumeration : solve auxiliary optimization problem over P z = min p P ¯ c p = min p P 1 ( π 1 , . . . , π n ) · a 1 p a 2 p . . . a np @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 16/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Cutting Stock: Pricing Problem implicit enumeration : solve auxiliary optimization problem over P z = min p P ¯ c p = min p P 1 ( π 1 , . . . , π n ) · a 1 p a 2 p . . . a np = min 1 n i =1 π i x i s.t. n i =1 i x i L x i Z + i [ n ] @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 16/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Cutting Stock: Pricing Problem implicit enumeration : solve auxiliary optimization problem over P z = min p P ¯ c p = min p P 1 ( π 1 , . . . , π n ) · a 1 p a 2 p . . . a np = 1 max n i =1 π i x i s.t. n i =1 i x i L x i Z + i [ n ] which is a knapsack problem! @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 16/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Cutting Stock: Pricing Problem two cases for the minimum reduced cost z = min p P ¯ c p : 1. z < 0 pricing variable values ( x i ) i [ n ] encode a feasible pattern p = ( a ip ) i [ n ] P P { p } ; repeat solving the RMP. 2. z 0 proves that there is no negative reduced cost (master variable that corresponds to a) feasible pattern @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 17/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Cutting Stock: Adding the Priced Variables to the RMP min p P λ p s.t. p P a 1 p λ p = d 1 . . . p P a np λ p = d n λ p 0 p P @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 18/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Cutting Stock: Adding the Priced Variables to the RMP min p P λ p + 1 λ p s.t. p P a 1 p λ p + a 1 p λ p = d 1 . . . p P a np λ p + a np λ p = d n λ p , λ p 0 p P coef fi cients a ip obtained from pricing problem solution x i @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 18/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Cutting Stock: Adding the Priced Variables to the RMP min p P λ p + 1 λ p + 1 λ p ∗∗ s.t. p P a 1 p λ p + a 1 p λ p + a 1 p ∗∗ λ p ∗∗ = d 1 . . . p P a np λ p + a np λ p + a np ∗∗ λ p ∗∗ = d n λ p , λ p , λ p ∗∗ 0 p P coef fi cients a ip obtained from pricing problem solution x i @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 18/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Cutting Stock: Adding the Priced Variables to the RMP min p P λ p + 1 λ p + 1 λ p ∗∗ + . . . s.t. p P a 1 p λ p + a 1 p λ p + a 1 p ∗∗ λ p ∗∗ + . . . = d 1 . . . p P a np λ p + a np λ p + a np ∗∗ λ p ∗∗ + . . . = d n λ p , λ p , λ p ∗∗ + . . . 0 p P this dynamic addition of variables is called column generation column generation is an algorithm to solve linear programs coef fi cients a ip obtained from pricing problem solution x i @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 18/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Why should this work? Motivation for Column Generation I in a basic solution to the master problem, at most m | J | variables are non-zero empirically, run time of simplex method linearly depends on no. m of rows possibly, many variables are never part of the basis Motivation for Column Generation II the “pattern based” model can be stronger than the “assignment based” model theory helps us proving this (via Dantzig-Wolfe reformulation) the “pattern based” model is not symmetric @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 19/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Another Example: Vertex Coloring Data G = ( V, E ) undirected graph Goal color all vertices such that adjacent vertices receive different colors, minimizing the number of used colors @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 20/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Textbook Model notation: C set of available colors @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 21/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Textbook Model notation: C set of available colors x ic { 0 , 1 } i V, c C // color i with c ? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 21/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Textbook Model notation: C set of available colors s.t. c C x ic = 1 i V // color each vertex x ic { 0 , 1 } i V, c C // color i with c ? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 21/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Textbook Model notation: C set of available colors s.t. c C x ic = 1 i V // color each vertex x ic + x jc 1 ij E, c C // avoid con icts x ic { 0 , 1 } i V, c C // color i with c ? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 21/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Textbook Model notation: C set of available colors s.t. c C x ic = 1 i V // color each vertex x ic + x jc 1 ij E, c C // avoid con icts x ic y c i V, c C // couple x and y x ic { 0 , 1 } i V, c C // color i with c ? y c { 0 , 1 } c C // do we use color c ? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 21/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Textbook Model notation: C set of available colors χ ( G ) = min c C y c // minimize number of used colors s.t. c C x ic = 1 i V // color each vertex x ic + x jc 1 ij E, c C // avoid con icts x ic y c i V, c C // couple x and y x ic { 0 , 1 } i V, c C // color i with c ? y c { 0 , 1 } c C // do we use color c ? χ ( G ) is called the chromatic number of G . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 21/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Master Problem observation: each color class forms an independent set in G denote by P the set of (encodings of) all independent sets in G a ip { 0 , 1 } denotes whether vertex i is contained in independent set p λ p { 0 , 1 } p P // do we use independent set p ? The LP relaxation gives a master problem solve it by column generation dual variables π t = ( π 1 , . . . , π | V | ) , one per vertex @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 22/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Master Problem observation: each color class forms an independent set in G denote by P the set of (encodings of) all independent sets in G a ip { 0 , 1 } denotes whether vertex i is contained in independent set p s.t. p P a ip λ p = 1 i V // every vertex must be covered λ p { 0 , 1 } p P // do we use independent set p ? The LP relaxation gives a master problem solve it by column generation dual variables π t = ( π 1 , . . . , π | V | ) , one per vertex @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 22/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Master Problem observation: each color class forms an independent set in G denote by P the set of (encodings of) all independent sets in G a ip { 0 , 1 } denotes whether vertex i is contained in independent set p min p P λ p // minimimize no. of sets used s.t. p P a ip λ p = 1 i V // every vertex must be covered λ p { 0 , 1 } p P // do we use independent set p ? The LP relaxation gives a master problem solve it by column generation dual variables π t = ( π 1 , . . . , π | V | ) , one per vertex @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 22/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Do you know it? how does the pricing problem look like? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 23/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Pricing Problem the pricing problem looks like ¯ c = min p P ¯ c p = min p P 1 ( π 1 , . . . , π | V | ) · a 1 p a 2 p . . . a | V | p @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 24/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Pricing Problem the pricing problem looks like ¯ c = min p P ¯ c p = min p P 1 ( π 1 , . . . , π | V | ) · a 1 p a 2 p . . . a | V | p = min 1 i V π i x i s.t. x i + x j 1 ij E x i { 0 , 1 } i V . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 24/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Vertex Coloring: Pricing Problem the pricing problem looks like ¯ c = min p P ¯ c p = min p P 1 ( π 1 , . . . , π | V | ) · a 1 p a 2 p . . . a | V | p = 1 max i V π i x i s.t. x i + x j 1 ij E x i { 0 , 1 } i V . which is a maximum weight independent set problem! @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 24/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Question how do we arrive at such models like Gilmore & Gomory’s?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Overview 1 Column Generation 2 Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation 2.1 Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation 2.2 Column Generation 2.3 Example 3 Branch-Price-and-Cut 4 Dual View
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Minkowski (1896) and Weyl (1935) Outer and Inner Representation of a Polyhedron For P R n , the following are equivalent: 1. P is a polyhedron 2. There are fi nite sets Q , R R n such that P = conv( Q ) + cone( R ) // P is fi nitely generated choose Q (resp. R ) as extreme points (resp. rays ) of P @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 27/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs (1960, 1961) we use this to equivalently reformulate what we call the original model min c t x s.t. A x b D x d x 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 28/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs (1960, 1961) we use this to equivalently reformulate what we call the original model min c t x s.t. A x b D x d x 0 identify two sets of constraints, typically constraints we know how to deal (well) with (the “easy constraints”) and everything else (the “complicating constraints”) . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 28/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs (1960, 1961) original formulation z LP = min c t x s.t. A x b D x d x 0 Idea: apply Minkowski-Weyl on the “easy constraints” X = { x 0 | D x d } vertices Q = { x 1 , . . . , x | Q | } , extreme rays R = { x 1 , . . . , x | R | } of X @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 29/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs (1960, 1961) vertices Q = { x 1 , . . . , x | Q | } , extreme rays R = { x 1 , . . . , x | R | } of X express every x X as x = q Q λ q x q + r R λ r x r q Q λ q = 1 // convexity constraint λ q 0 q Q λ r 0 r R and substitute this x X in A x b and c t x . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 30/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs (1960, 1961) substitution of x X in A x b and c t x min c t q Q λ q x q + r R λ r x r s.t. A q Q λ q x q + r R λ r x r b q Q λ q = 1 λ q 0 q Q λ r 0 r R @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 31/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs (1960, 1961) substitution of x X in A x b and c t x and some rearranging min q Q λ q c t x q + r R λ r c t x r s.t. q Q λ q A x q + r R λ r A x r b q Q λ q = 1 λ q 0 q Q λ r 0 r R @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 31/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs (1960, 1961) substitution of x X in A x b and c t x and some rearranging min q Q λ q c t x q �� =: c q + r R λ r c t x r �� =: c r s.t. q Q λ q A x q ���� =: a q + r R λ r A x r ���� =: a r b q Q λ q = 1 λ q 0 q Q λ r 0 r R @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 31/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs (1960, 1961) leads to an extended LP which we call the master problem z MP = min q Q c q λ q + r R c r λ r s.t. q Q a q λ q + r R a r λ r b q Q λ q = 1 λ q 0 q Q λ r 0 r R which is equivalent to the original LP, i.e., z LP = z MP @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 31/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The Dantzig-Wolfe Master Problem the master problem has a huge number | Q | + | R | of variables it needs to be solved by column generation initialize the RMP with Q Q and R R solve the RMP to obtain primal λ and dual π , π 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 32/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The Dantzig-Wolfe Restricted Master Problem z RMP = min q Q c q λ q + r R c r λ r s.t. q Q a q λ q + r R a r λ r b [ π ] q Q λ q = 1 [ π 0 ] λ q 0 q Q λ r 0 r R @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 33/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Reduced Cost Computation for the reduced cost formula we distinguish two cases for λ q , q Q : // variables corresponding to extreme points ¯ c q = c q ( π t , π 0 ) a q 1 = c q π t a q π 0 = c t x q π t A x q π 0 for λ r , r R : // variables corresponding to extreme rays ¯ c r = c r ( π t , π 0 ) a r 0 = c r π t a r = c t x r π t A x r we need to compute ¯ c = min { min q Q ¯ c q , min r R ¯ c r } // the smallest reduced cost @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 34/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem in words: fi nd an extreme point q Q with minimum ¯ c q and/or an extreme ray r R with minimum ¯ c r @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 35/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem in words: fi nd an extreme point q Q with minimum ¯ c q and/or an extreme ray r R with minimum ¯ c r to this end, solve the Dantzig-Wolfe pricing problem z PP = min j Q R c t x j π t A x j // no π 0 here @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 35/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem in words: fi nd an extreme point q Q with minimum ¯ c q and/or an extreme ray r R with minimum ¯ c r to this end, solve the Dantzig-Wolfe pricing problem z PP = min j Q R c t x j π t A x j // no π 0 here = min ( c t π t A ) x s.t. D x d x 0 Q and R contain the extreme points / extreme rays of { x 0 | D x d } ! the pricing problem is again a linear program // solve it e.g., with the simplex algorithm @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 35/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem three cases for z PP = min x 0 ( c t π t A ) x | D x d @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 36/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem three cases for z PP = min x 0 ( c t π t A ) x | D x d 1. z PP = −∞ @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 36/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem three cases for z PP = min x 0 ( c t π t A ) x | D x d 1. z PP = −∞ ⇒ we identi fi ed an extreme ray r R with ¯ c r < 0 add variable λ r to the RMP with cost c t x r and column coef fi cients A x r 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 36/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem three cases for z PP = min x 0 ( c t π t A ) x | D x d 1. z PP = −∞ ⇒ we identi fi ed an extreme ray r R with ¯ c r < 0 add variable λ r to the RMP with cost c t x r and column coef fi cients A x r 0 2. −∞ < z PP π 0 < 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 36/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem three cases for z PP = min x 0 ( c t π t A ) x | D x d 1. z PP = −∞ ⇒ we identi fi ed an extreme ray r R with ¯ c r < 0 add variable λ r to the RMP with cost c t x r and column coef fi cients A x r 0 2. −∞ < z PP π 0 < 0 we identi fi ed an extreme point q Q with ¯ c q < 0 add variable λ q to the RMP with cost c t x q and column coef fi cients A x q 1 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 36/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem three cases for z PP = min x 0 ( c t π t A ) x | D x d 1. z PP = −∞ ⇒ we identi fi ed an extreme ray r R with ¯ c r < 0 add variable λ r to the RMP with cost c t x r and column coef fi cients A x r 0 2. −∞ < z PP π 0 < 0 we identi fi ed an extreme point q Q with ¯ c q < 0 add variable λ q to the RMP with cost c t x q and column coef fi cients A x q 1 3. 0 z PP π 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 36/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Pricing Problem three cases for z PP = min x 0 ( c t π t A ) x | D x d 1. z PP = −∞ ⇒ we identi fi ed an extreme ray r R with ¯ c r < 0 add variable λ r to the RMP with cost c t x r and column coef fi cients A x r 0 2. −∞ < z PP π 0 < 0 we identi fi ed an extreme point q Q with ¯ c q < 0 add variable λ q to the RMP with cost c t x q and column coef fi cients A x q 1 3. 0 z PP π 0 there is no j Q R with ¯ c j < 0 . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 36/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Projecting back to the Original Variables by construction, we can always obtain an original x solution from a master λ solution via x = q Q λ q x q + r R λ r x r @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 37/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Brie y Pause go back to the cutting stock and vertex coloring problems you recognize original constraints in master and pricing problems however, not exactly, the reformulation “forgot” about rolls and colors this is common and called aggregation
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Block-Angular Matrices the classical Dantzig-Wolfe situation is min c t 1 x 1 + c t 2 x 2 + · · · + c t K x K s.t. A 1 x 1 + A 2 x 2 + · · · + A K x K b D 1 x 1 d 1 D 2 x 2 d 2 . . . . . . D K x K d K x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x K 0 K rolls, K colors, K vehicles, K subproblems , . . . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 39/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Block-Angular Matrices the classical Dantzig-Wolfe situation is 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 39/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Block-Angular Matrices constraints/variables of each block are separately DW reformulated yields K pricing problems all must report non-negative reduced cost for RMP optimality the blocks can be identical, in which case one can aggregate them // loosely speaking, master and pricing problem use only one representative @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 40/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs: Pictorially { x Q n | Dx d } { x Q n | Ax b } “pricing problem” “master problem” @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 41/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs: Pictorially { x Q n | Dx d } { x Q n | Ax b } “pricing problem” “master problem” @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 41/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs: Pictorially { x Q n | Dx d } { x Q n | Ax b } “pricing problem” “master problem” @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 41/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs: Pictorially { x Q n | Dx d } { x Q n | Ax b } “pricing problem” “master problem” @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 41/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for LPs: Pictorially { x Q n | Dx d } { x Q n | Ax b } “pricing problem” “master problem” not tighter than standard LP relaxation @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 41/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Brie y Pause but the pricing problems we have seen were integer programs!
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for IPs: Pictorially { x Q n | Dx d } { x Q n | Ax b } “pricing problem” “master problem” not tighter than standard LP relaxation @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 43/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for IPs: Pictorially { x Q n | Dx d } { x Q n | Ax b } “pricing problem” “master problem” for integer programs: partial convexi fi cation conv { x Z n | Dx d } @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 43/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation for IPs: Pictorially { x Q n | Dx d } { x Q n | Ax b } “pricing problem” “master problem” for integer programs: partial convexi fi cation , possibly stronger @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 43/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Do you know it? DW reformulating a linear program leads to an equivalent linear program true false it depends DW reformulating an integer program leads to a stronger relaxation than the LP relaxation true false it depends @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 44/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Brie y Pause column generation relies on our ability to optimize over conv { x Z n | Dx d } how should we choose D x d ? D x d should describe a structure over which we can (easily) optimize convexifying D x d should improve the dual bound (well)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Numerical Example: Taken from the “Primer” fi nd: shortest path (RCSP) from 1 to 6 cost time 3 5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) (2,2) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 46/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Numerical Example: Taken from the “Primer” fi nd: resource constrained shortest path (RCSP) from 1 to 6 total traversal time must not exceed 14 units time cost 3 5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 46/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Numerical Example: Taken from the “Primer” fi nd: resource constrained shortest path (RCSP) from 1 to 6 total traversal time must not exceed 14 units time cost 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 3 5 path 1-3-5-6 is quick but expensive: cost 24, time 8 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 46/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Numerical Example: Taken from the “Primer” fi nd: resource constrained shortest path (RCSP) from 1 to 6 total traversal time must not exceed 14 units time cost 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 3 5 path 1-2-4-6 is cheap but too slow: cost 3, time 18 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 46/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Numerical Example: Taken from the “Primer” fi nd: resource constrained shortest path (RCSP) from 1 to 6 total traversal time must not exceed 14 units time cost 3 5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) path 1-3-2-4-6 is optimal: cost 13, time 13 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 46/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Integer Program for the RCSP Problem c ij cost on arc ( i, j ) , t ij time to traverse ( i, j ) z := min ( i,j ) A c ij x ij s.t. j :(1 ,j ) A x 1 j = 1 j :( i,j ) A x ij j :( j,i ) A x ji = 0 i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 i :( i, 6) A x i 6 = 1 ( i,j ) A t ij x ij 14 x ij { 0 , 1 } ( i, j ) A @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 47/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Integer Program for the RCSP Problem c ij cost on arc ( i, j ) , t ij time to traverse ( i, j ) z := min ( i,j ) A c ij x ij s.t. j :(1 ,j ) A x 1 j = 1 j :( i,j ) A x ij j :( j,i ) A x ji = 0 i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 i :( i, 6) A x i 6 = 1 ( i,j ) A t ij x ij 14 x ij { 0 , 1 } ( i, j ) A could be solved by branch-and-bound (B&B) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 47/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Integer Program for the RCSP Problem c ij cost on arc ( i, j ) , t ij time to traverse ( i, j ) z := min ( i,j ) A c ij x ij s.t. j :(1 ,j ) A x 1 j = 1 j :( i,j ) A x ij j :( j,i ) A x ji = 0 i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 i :( i, 6) A x i 6 = 1 ( i,j ) A t ij x ij 14 x ij { 0 , 1 } ( i, j ) A instead: exploit embedded shortest path problem structure @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 47/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Paths vs. Arcs Formulation what remains // these constraints go into the pricing problem j :(1 ,j ) A x 1 j = 1 j :( i,j ) A x ij j :( j,i ) A x ji = 0 i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 i :( i, 6) A x i 6 = 1 x ij { 0 , 1 } ( i, j ) A de fi nes a (particular) network ow problem fact: every ow de fi ned on arcs decomposes into ows on paths (and cycles) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 48/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Paths vs. Arcs Formulation the convex hull of j :(1 ,j ) A x 1 j = 1 j :( i,j ) A x ij j :( j,i ) A x ji = 0 i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 i :( i, 6) A x i 6 = 1 x ij { 0 , 1 } ( i, j ) A de fi nes a polyhedron (in fact, a polytope) with integer vertices fact: every arc ow can be represented as convex combination of path (and cycle) ows // vertices of the above polytope are incidence vectors of 1-6-paths @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 48/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Paths vs. Arcs Formulation fact: every arc ow can be represented as convex combination of path (and cycle) ows x ij = p P x pij λ p ( i, j ) A p P λ p = 1 // convexity constraint λ p 0 p P P denotes the set of all paths from node 1 to node 6 notation: x pij = 1 iff arc ( i, j ) on path p , otherwise x pij = 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 49/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Integer Master Problem now substitute for x ij in our original IP p P λ p = 1 λ p 0 p P p P x pij λ p = x ij ( i, j ) A @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 50/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Integer Master Problem now substitute for x ij in our original IP z = min p P ( ( i,j ) A c ij x pij ) λ p s.t. p P ( ( i,j ) A t ij x pij ) λ p 14 p P λ p = 1 λ p 0 p P p P x pij λ p = x ij ( i, j ) A x ij { 0 , 1 } ( i, j ) A @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 50/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Master Problem now substitute for x ij in our original IP and relax the integrality of x ij z = min p P ( ( i,j ) A c ij x pij ) λ p s.t. p P ( ( i,j ) A t ij x pij ) λ p 14 p P λ p = 1 λ p 0 p P p P x pij λ p = x ij ( i, j ) A x ij 0 ( i, j ) A @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 50/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Master Problem now substitute for x ij in our original IP and relax the integrality of x ij ¯ z = min p P ( ( i,j ) A c ij x pij ) λ p s.t. p P ( ( i,j ) A t ij x pij ) λ p 14 p P λ p = 1 λ p 0 p P we can remove the link between x ij and λ p variables @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 50/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Master Problem in general, this will have many more than 9 variables. . . min 3 λ 1246 +14 λ 12456 + 5 λ 1256 +13 λ 13246 +24 λ 132456 +15 λ 13256 +16 λ 1346 +27 λ 13456 +24 λ 1356 s.t. 18 λ 1246 +14 λ 12456 +15 λ 1256 +13 λ 13246 + 9 λ 132456 +10 λ 13256 +17 λ 1346 +13 λ 13456 + 8 λ 1356 14 λ 1246 + λ 12456 + λ 1256 + λ 13246 + λ 132456 + λ 13256 + λ 1346 + λ 13456 + λ 1356 = 1 λ 1246 , λ 12456 , λ 1256 , λ 13246 , λ 132456 , λ 13256 , λ 1346 , λ 13456 , λ 1356 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 51/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Restricted Master Problem in general, this will have many more than 9 variables. . . min 5 λ 1256 +13 λ 13246 +15 λ 13256 s.t. 15 λ 1256 +13 λ 13246 +10 λ 13256 14 λ 1256 + λ 13246 + λ 13256 = 1 λ 1256 , λ 13246 , λ 13256 0 the restricted master problem works with a (very small) subset of variables only we add more variables as needed. . . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 51/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Restricted Master Problem (RMP) how do we generate such a column ? ¯ z = min . . . + 24 λ 132456 + . . . s.t. . . . + 9 λ 132456 + . . . 14 . . . + 1 λ 132456 + . . . = 1 . . . 1 λ 132456 . . . 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 52/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Restricted Master Problem (RMP) how do we generate such a column ? duals ¯ z = min . . . + 24 λ 132456 + . . . s.t. . . . + 9 λ 132456 + . . . 14 π 1 . . . + 1 λ 132456 + . . . = 1 π 0 . . . 1 λ 132456 . . . 0 for a speci fi c variable, we can compute the reduced cost: ¯ c 132456 = 24 ( π 1 , π 0 ) t · 9 1 = 24 9 π 1 1 π 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 52/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Pricing Subproblem in general, for this application, the reduced cost of variable λ p computes as ¯ c p = ( i,j A ) c ij x pij ( ( i,j A ) t ij x pij ) π 1 π 0 and we are interested in the smallest possible: ¯ c = min ( i,j ) A ( c ij π 1 t ij ) x ij π 0 s. t. the x ij encode a feasible column If ¯ c 0 then there is no improving variable; otherwise we found a column to add to the RMP @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 53/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Pricing Subproblem in general, for this application, the reduced cost of variable λ p computes as ¯ c p = ( i,j A ) c ij x pij ( ( i,j A ) t ij x pij ) π 1 π 0 and we are interested in the smallest possible: ¯ c = min ( i,j ) A ( c ij π 1 t ij ) x ij π 0 s. t. j :(1 ,j ) A x 1 j = 1 j :( i,j ) A x ij j :( j,i ) A x ji = 0 i = 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 i :( i, 6) A x i 6 = 1 x ij 0 ( i, j ) A If ¯ c 0 then there is no improving variable; otherwise we found a column to add to the RMP @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 53/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Pricing Subproblem for this application, this is a shortest path problem in 5 6 1 2 3 4 10 1 π 1 10 3 π 1 1 2 π 1 1 10 π 1 1 1 π 1 1 7 π 1 2 2 π 1 12 3 π 1 2 3 π 1 5 7 π 1 this is the original graph with modi fi ed costs remember: this was the reason for the reformulation: we wanted to exploit that we can solve shortest path problems @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 54/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Initializing the Master Problem question: how to start? initially, we have no feasible solution to the RMP! // maybe no variables at all one possibility: “big M approach” // there are several other ways introduce arti fi cial variable y 0 with “large” cost, say M = 100 : ¯ z = min 100 y 0 s.t. 14 y 0 = 1 y 0 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 55/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 s.t. 14 π 1 y 0 = 1 π 0 y 0 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 s.t. 14 π 1 y 0 = 1 π 0 y 0 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 s.t. 14 π 1 y 0 = 1 π 0 y 0 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 s.t. 18 λ 1246 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 s.t. 18 λ 1246 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 3 5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 0.78 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 + 24 λ 1356 s.t. 18 λ 1246 + 8 λ 1356 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 + λ 1356 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 , λ 1356 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 32 . 9 1356 24 8 3 5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 0.78 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 + 24 λ 1356 s.t. 18 λ 1246 + 8 λ 1356 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 + λ 1356 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 , λ 1356 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 32 . 9 1356 24 8 λ 1246 = 0 . 6 , λ 1356 = 0 . 4 11 . 4 40 . 80 2 . 10 0.4 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 0.6 3 5 (12,3) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 + 24 λ 1356 + 15 λ 13256 s.t. 18 λ 1246 + 8 λ 1356 + 10 λ 13256 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 + λ 1356 + λ 13256 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 , λ 1356 , λ 13256 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 32 . 9 1356 24 8 λ 1246 = 0 . 6 , λ 1356 = 0 . 4 11 . 4 40 . 80 2 . 10 4 . 8 13256 15 10 0.4 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 0.6 3 5 (12,3) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 + 24 λ 1356 + 15 λ 13256 s.t. 18 λ 1246 + 8 λ 1356 + 10 λ 13256 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 + λ 1356 + λ 13256 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 , λ 1356 , λ 13256 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 32 . 9 1356 24 8 λ 1246 = 0 . 6 , λ 1356 = 0 . 4 11 . 4 40 . 80 2 . 10 4 . 8 13256 15 10 λ 1246 = λ 13256 = 0 . 5 9 . 0 30 . 00 1 . 50 0.5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 0.5 3 5 (12,3) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 + 24 λ 1356 + 15 λ 13256 + 5 λ 1256 s.t. 18 λ 1246 + 8 λ 1356 + 10 λ 13256 + 15 λ 1256 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 + λ 1356 + λ 13256 + λ 1256 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 , λ 1356 , λ 13256 , λ 1256 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 32 . 9 1356 24 8 λ 1246 = 0 . 6 , λ 1356 = 0 . 4 11 . 4 40 . 80 2 . 10 4 . 8 13256 15 10 λ 1246 = λ 13256 = 0 . 5 9 . 0 30 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 5 1256 5 15 0.5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 0.5 3 5 (12,3) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem ¯ z = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 + 24 λ 1356 + 15 λ 13256 + 5 λ 1256 s.t. 18 λ 1246 + 8 λ 1356 + 10 λ 13256 + 15 λ 1256 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 + λ 1356 + λ 13256 + λ 1256 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 , λ 1356 , λ 13256 , λ 1256 0 master solution ¯ z π 0 π 1 ¯ c p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 32 . 9 1356 24 8 λ 1246 = 0 . 6 , λ 1356 = 0 . 4 11 . 4 40 . 80 2 . 10 4 . 8 13256 15 10 λ 1246 = λ 13256 = 0 . 5 9 . 0 30 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 5 1256 5 15 λ 13256 = 0 . 2 , λ 1256 = 0 . 8 7 . 0 35 . 00 2 . 00 0 0.2 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 3 5 (12,3) (2,2) 0.8 arc ows: x 12 = 0 . 8 , x 13 = x 32 = 0 . 2 , x 25 = x 56 = 1 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 56/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Solving the Master Problem remarks about the optimal RMP solution 0.2 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 3 5 (12,3) (2,2) 0.8 we use 0 . 2 times path 13256 we use 0 . 8 times path 1256, which is infeasible in the MP a lower bound on the optimal integer solution objective value is ¯ z = 7 . 0 we would have obtained the corresponding “arc ow” solution (with the same lower bound) by solving the LP relaxation of the original IP @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 57/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Do you know it? do you know why the dual bound of the reformulation is no better than the LP relaxation of the original formulation? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 58/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Do you know it? do you know why the dual bound of the reformulation is no better than the LP relaxation of the original formulation? the polyhedron corresponding to the pricing problem has integer extreme points solving the pricing problem in integers does not improve over the LP @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 58/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Overview 1 Column Generation 2 Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation 3 Branch-Price-and-Cut 3.1 Cutting Planes 3.2 Branching 4 Dual View
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Strong and Stronger using a Dantzig-Wolfe reformulation, we may obtain a stronger relaxation we can try to strengthen it even more by adding cutting planes
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Cutting Planes on Original Variables typically, the literature is full of cutting planes in the original variables min c t x s.t. A x b F x f valid inequalities with duals α x X @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 61/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Cutting Planes on Original Variables typically, the literature is full of cutting planes in the original variables min c t x s.t. A x b F x f valid inequalities with duals α x X DW reformulation yields (added to the master): p P f p λ p + r R f r λ r f with f j = F x j , j P R @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 61/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Cutting Planes on Original Variables typically, the literature is full of cutting planes in the original variables min c t x s.t. A x b F x f valid inequalities with duals α x X DW reformulation yields (added to the master): p P f p λ p + r R f r λ r f with f j = F x j , j P R modi fi ed pricing: min { c t x π t A x α t F x π 0 | x X } keep in mind usually, only the subproblem’s objective function is changed! @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 61/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Adding Rows and Columns works column generation is compatible with adding cutting planes but when the cuts are formulated in original variables, they may not be strong better try to exploit the new variables we have in the reformulation
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Cutting Planes on Master Variables many applications have integer master variables , then try master problem cuts min p P c p λ p + r R c r λ r s.t. p P a p λ p + r R a r λ r b p P g p λ p + r R g r λ r g with duals β p P λ p = 1 λ Z | P | + | R | + the cuts’ dual variables may have a larger impact on the pricing problem @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 63/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Odd Circuit Cuts given an undirected graph G = ( V, E ) edge-coloring problem : color all edges, no adjacent edges in same color this is a partitioning of the edges into matchings Nemhauser & Park (1991) min j J λ j s.t. j J a j λ j 1 // incidence vectors a j of matchings λ { 0 , 1 } | J | // one variable per matching pricing: min 1 e E π e x e | x matching @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 64/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Example: Odd Circuit Cuts let U V with | U | odd induce an odd circuit C we need at least three matchings to cover C odd circuit cut : j J g ( a ( x )) λ j = j J : j C = λ j 3 [ β C ] we introduce an additional binary variable y := g ( a ( x )) := 1 iff x intersects C and modify the pricing problem: min 1 e E π e x e β C y | y e C x e , x matching , y { 0 , 1 } @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 65/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Reminder: We want to solve an Integer Program original problem: min c t x s.t. A x b x X X = { x Z n + | D x d }
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
So far we only solved Linear Programs the algorithm to solve integer programs is the LP based B&C algorithm branch-and-price(-and-cut) means solving the LP relaxation in each node of the B&C tree by column generation we solved the root node so far
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dichotomic Branching on Original Variables the DW reformulation gave us the integer master problem z IMP = min q Q c q λ q + r R c r λ r s.t. q Q a q λ q + r R a r λ r b q Q λ q = 1 λ q 0 q Q λ r 0 r R x = q Q x q λ q + r R x r λ r x Z n + @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 68/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dichotomic Branching on Original Variables when x = x Z n + we are done otherwise, there is an x i with x i / Z + create two branches via x i ≤ � x i and x i ≥ � x i this is called dichotomic branching there are two options for doing so // imposing the branching constraints in the master or in the pricing both options can be combined these ideas date back to Desrosiers, Soumis, Desrochers (1984) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 68/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Branching on Original Variables: In the Master we only consider the down branch; the up branch is analogous // also called left branch we impose x i ≤ � x i in the master problem by adding the constraint q Q x qi λ q + r R x ri λ r ≤ � x i [ α i ] where x ji is the i -th coordinate of x j , j Q R // this is like formulating a cutting plane on original variables @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 69/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Branching on Original Variables: In the Master we only consider the down branch; the up branch is analogous // also called left branch we impose x i ≤ � x i in the master problem by adding the constraint q Q x qi λ q + r R x ri λ r ≤ � x i [ α i ] where x ji is the i -th coordinate of x j , j Q R // this is like formulating a cutting plane on original variables we already know how to respect the dual α i in the pricing: min ( c t π t A ) x α i x i s.t. D x d x Z n + @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 69/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Branching on Original Variables: In the Pricing alternatively, impose the branching constraint in the pricing min ( c t π t A ) x s.t. D x d x i x i x Z n + in this variant, we additionally need to forbid master variables that contradict the branching decision: remove all variables λ j from RMP with x ji > x i this is implemented by imposing a local bound λ j 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 70/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Pros and Cons of the two Options branching constraints in the pricing or in the master? 1. min { c t x | A x b , x conv( X ) , x i ≤ � x i } min { c t x | A x b , x conv( X { x | x i ≤ � x i } ) } “convexifying the branching constraints is potentially stronger” @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 71/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Pros and Cons of the two Options branching constraints in the pricing or in the master? 1. min { c t x | A x b , x conv( X ) , x i ≤ � x i } min { c t x | A x b , x conv( X { x | x i ≤ � x i } ) } “convexifying the branching constraints is potentially stronger” 2. the subproblem character may change by imposing bounds on variables, potentially making it harder to solve @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 71/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Pros and Cons of the two Options branching constraints in the pricing or in the master? 1. min { c t x | A x b , x conv( X ) , x i ≤ � x i } min { c t x | A x b , x conv( X { x | x i ≤ � x i } ) } “convexifying the branching constraints is potentially stronger” 2. the subproblem character may change by imposing bounds on variables, potentially making it harder to solve 3. by imposing bounds on subproblem variables, we are enabled to generate points in the interior of conv( X ) ; this is potentially necessary in integer problems @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 71/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dichotomic Branching on Master Variables branching on master variables λ j = λ j / Z is not advisable. why? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 72/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dichotomic Branching on Master Variables branching on master variables λ j = λ j / Z is not advisable. why? 1. this may be wrong! // even though in binary programs. we are safe 2. the resulting tree is unbalanced : λ j ≤ � λ forbids almost nothing; λ j ≥ � λ enforces much 3. a down branch λ j ≤ � λ can be very hard to respect in the pricing problem: how to avoid re-generating λ j ? @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 72/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Our RCSPP Example Continued let us revisit the resource constrained shortest path example 0.2 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 3 5 (12,3) (2,2) 0.8 the solution we obtained for the root node is fractional in the original variables @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 73/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Branching on Fractional Arcs branch on fractional arc variables, like x 12 = 0 . 8 0.2 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (1,10) (10,3) 1 (5,7) 3 5 (12,3) (2,2) 0.8 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 74/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Branching on Fractional Arcs branch on fractional arc variables, like x 12 = 0 . 8 3 5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,2) (10,3) 1 (5,7) branch x 12 = 0 in subproblem: arc (1 , 2) is removed from graph in RMP: variables λ 1246 and λ 1256 must be eliminated; re-optimization will give y 0 > 0 , i.e., infeasible RMP @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 74/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Branching on Fractional Arcs branch on fractional arc variables, like x 12 = 0 . 8 3 5 4 2 6 (2,3) (10,1) (2,2) (12,3) (1,7) (1,1) (1,10) 1 (5,7) branch x 12 = 1 in subproblem: arcs (1 , 3) and (3 , 2) are removed in RMP: eliminate master variables corresponding to paths containing these arcs @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 74/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Much more on Branching. . . when all your pricing problems are different, branching on original variables works well in particular when pricing problems are aggregated, different proposals available check specialized branching rules for set partitioning master Ryan, Foster (1981) @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 75/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Overview 1 Column Generation 2 Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation 3 Branch-Price-and-Cut 4 Dual View
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
The Dual Point of View @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 77/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Row Generation remember the DW master problem min p P c p λ p + r R c r λ r s.t. p P a p λ p + r R a r λ r b [ π ] p P λ p = 1 [ π 0 ] λ p 0 p P λ r 0 r R . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 78/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Row Generation this is its dual: max b t π + π 0 s.t. a t p π + π 0 c p [ λ p ] p P a t r π c r [ λ r ] r R π 0 , π 0 R . negative reduced cost in primal violated constraint in dual column generation in the primal is row generation in the dual @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 78/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lagrangian Relaxation we (still!) wish to solve the original integer program: z IP = min c t x s.t. A x b D x d x Z n + @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 79/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lagrangian Relaxation we (still!) wish to solve the original integer program: z IP = min c t x s.t. A x b D x d x Z n + relax complicating constraints, penalize their violation in objective function: min x Z n + { c t x + π t ( b A x ) | D x d } this gives a lower bound L ( π ) z IP for every π 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 79/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lagrangian Dual Problem we are interested in the best (largest) such Lagrangian bound max π 0 L ( π ) = max π 0 min x Z n + { c t x + π t ( b A x ) | D x d } a lot is known about the Lagrangian dual function L ( π ) one typically maximizes it using a subgradient algorithm // but we don’t need this here @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 80/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lagrangian Bound in Column Generation assume π is a dual solution to our Dantzig-Wolfe RMP L ( π ) = min x Z n + { c t x + π t ( b A x ) | D x d } = min x Z n + { π t b + ( c t π t A ) x | D x d } = π t b + min x Z n + { ( c t π t A ) x | D x d } we cannot help it: column generation produces dual bounds the Lagrangian bound computes as optimum of the RMP plus the optima of the pricing problems @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 81/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Development of Bounds 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 z MP z RMP LB iteration z z RMP L ( π ) LB @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 82/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Development of Bounds the bounds close at MP optimality Lagrangian relaxation and DW reformulation are equivalent optimal π from MP maximizes Lagrangian dual function @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 82/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dual Bounds: RCSPP Example Revisited z RMP = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 + 24 λ 1356 + 15 λ 13256 + 5 λ 1256 s.t. 18 λ 1246 + 8 λ 1356 + 10 λ 13256 + 15 λ 1256 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 + λ 1356 + λ 13256 + λ 1256 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 , λ 1356 , λ 13256 , λ 1256 0 master solution z RMP π 0 π 1 z SP p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 32 . 9 1356 24 8 λ 1246 = 0 . 6 , λ 1356 = 0 . 4 11 . 4 40 . 80 2 . 10 4 . 8 13256 15 10 λ 1246 = λ 13256 = 0 . 5 9 . 0 30 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 5 1256 5 15 λ 13256 = 0 . 2 , λ 1256 = 0 . 8 7 . 0 35 . 00 2 . 00 0 @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 83/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Dual Bounds: RCSPP Example Revisited z RMP = min 100 y 0 + 3 λ 1246 + 24 λ 1356 + 15 λ 13256 + 5 λ 1256 s.t. 18 λ 1246 + 8 λ 1356 + 10 λ 13256 + 15 λ 1256 14 π 1 y 0 + λ 1246 + λ 1356 + λ 13256 + λ 1256 = 1 π 0 y 0 , λ 1246 , λ 1356 , λ 13256 , λ 1256 0 master solution z RMP π 0 π 1 z SP p c p t p y 0 = 1 100 . 0 100 . 00 0 . 00 97 . 0 1246 3 18 y 0 = 0 . 22 , λ 1246 = 0 . 78 24 . 6 100 . 00 5 . 39 32 . 9 1356 24 8 λ 1246 = 0 . 6 , λ 1356 = 0 . 4 11 . 4 40 . 80 2 . 10 4 . 8 13256 15 10 λ 1246 = λ 13256 = 0 . 5 9 . 0 30 . 00 1 . 50 2 . 5 1256 5 15 λ 13256 = 0 . 2 , λ 1256 = 0 . 8 7 . 0 35 . 00 2 . 00 0 we could have stopped before the last pricing (which can be costly!): z RMP + z SP = 9 . 0 2 . 5 = 6 . 5 and 6 . 5 = 7 . 0 when the optimum is integer one can stop as soon as LB = UB for a lower bound LB and an upper bound UB on z MP @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 83/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Where to start?
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Some Practical Advise avoid solving the pricing problem exactly, use heuristics if you can avoid solving the pricing problem exactly, use heuristics if you can avoid solving the pricing problem exactly, use heuristics if you can generate many columns per iteration, possibly also good for integer solutions if you have many pricing problems, don’t call all of them in each iteration monitor the Lagrangian (or other) dual bound, branch early when duality gap is small try using subgradient methods when the master re-optimization is costly try stabilizing dual variables (plot their development if you have issues) apply cutting planes, ideally in master variables @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 85/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Take-Away usually: problem model algorithm implementation CG/B&P is not (only) about an algorithm CG/B&P enables us to think different models this may lead to a different understanding of the problem con fi gurations, combinations, selections, sequences, . . . @mluebbecke · CO@Work 2020 · Column Generation, Dantzig-Wolfe Reformulation , Branch-Price-and-Cut · 86/86
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help

Browse Popular Homework Q&A

Q: 2.35. Prove that if x and y are distinct real numbers, then (x + 1)² = (y + 1)² if and only if x + y…
Q: Conduct the following test at the x = 0.10 level of significance by determining (a) the null and…
Q: QUESTION 40 An inhibitor that binds noncovalently to the active site is noncovalently to a different…
Q: A rectangular 10.0 cm by 20.0 cm circuit carrying an 8.00 A current is oriented with its plane…
Q: A printing press that costs $285,900 is depreciated using the 1.5 declining-balance method. The…
Q: Sorting: void bubble_sort(int arr[], int n, unsigned& comparisons, unsigned& swaps); void…
Q: Arc length Find the arc length of the following curves on the given interval. x = 3 cos t, y = 3 sin…
Q: If you need $40,000 for your son's education in 10 years, how much must you deposit at the beginning…
Q: The curves →r1(t)=⟨t,t5,2t4⟩r→1(t)=⟨t,t5,2t4⟩ and…
Q: ast year Minden Company introduced a new product and sold 25,500 units of it at a price of $99 per…
Q: 3. Can a square matrix with two identical rows be invertible? Why or why not?
Q: What is the pH of a solution of 0.100M HCN mixed with 0.150M NaCN?  Assume the total volume is…
Q: Determine the amount to be paid in full settlement of each invoice, assuming that credit for returns…
Q: At a local catering business, customers can bundle different plate options. ten hot dog plates and…
Q: A bank made a farmer a loan of $1,00 loan. Compare the compound interes Future value= $0 (Round to…
Q: 12.6 ft 7.2 ft 12.6 ft 16.8 ft 9.9 ft Three cables are used to tether a balloon as shown. Determine…
Q: If you ran an unknown sample on a TLC using 3-Methyl-Pentane as eluent and observed only one spot…
Q: Charging a price to different groups depending on their different demand elasticities is described…
Q: Maturity (years) YTM 5.03% 2 5.54% 3 5.73% 5.98% 6.06%
Q: certain region would like to estimate the proportion of voters who intend to participate in upcoming…
Q: Gold Nest Company of Guandong, China, is a family-owned enterprise that makes birdcages for the…
Q: For the following chemical reaction,      CO (g)   +   H2O (g)      CO2 (g)   +   H2 (g)     Kc =…