W4 DSM Reclassification of Autism Spectrum Disorder
.docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Grand Canyon University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
673
Subject
Arts Humanities
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
7
Uploaded by ProfessorLeopard4338
DSM Reclassification of Autism Spectrum Disorder
Gina Marwick
College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Grand Canyon University
PCN-673 Developmental Disabilities
Dr. Laklieshia Izzard
August 2, 2023
DSM Reclassification of Autism Spectrum Disorder
There have been long-standing controversies with the American Psychological
Association’s (APA) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), particularly
surrounding autism. However, the American Psychiatric Association is constantly reviewing the
DSM and trying to improve upon the diagnostic criteria for several disorders, including autism.
The most current version of the DSM is the recently released DSM-5-TR, which came out in
March 2022. This paper will discuss the significant changes between the DSM-IV and DSM-5-
TR, the benefits and consequences of the DSM-5-TR changes in a home setting, and the benefits
and consequences of the changes in a school setting.
Significant Changes Between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5-TR
The APA made substantial changes to autism classification from DSM-IV-TR to the
DSM-5 by combining autism, Asperger’s syndrome, childhood disintegrative disorder, and
pervasive development disorder not otherwise specified in the new terminology of Autism
Spectrum Disorder (APA, 2013b). In another significant change, the DSM-5 also combined the
language and social deficiencies into one category, making three areas instead of two (Wright,
2013). Additionally, the DSM-5 also states that an Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) diagnosis
requires “persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple
contexts, as manifested by the following” (APA, 2013a). The DSM-5-TR added two words to
this statement, so it now reads “…as manifested by
all of
the following” (Hess, 2022). These two
additional words added clarity to the diagnostic criteria that every following criterion had to be
met for diagnosis, rather than any of the following (Hess, 2022).
There are other disorders that were previously separated from autism in the DSM-IV but
are now under the umbrella of ASD in the DSM-5 and DSM-5-TR. Rett’s, which was originally
included in the DSM-IV under pervasive developmental disorders (APA, 2000), is now included
as an ASD diagnosis. While under review, the committee decided that although Rett’s syndrome
has autistic features, it has a genetic cause. Therefore those with Rett’s syndrome will have to
meet all the other diagnostic criteria to qualify for an ASD diagnosis (Oberman & Kaufmann,
2020). This also holds true for Asperger’s syndrome and pervasive developmental disorder not
otherwise specified. That being said, those with previously established autism diagnosis due to
Rett’s syndrome, Asperger’s syndrome, or pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise
specified should still be given an ASD diagnosis under the DSM-5 recommendations (APA,
2013).
Another significant change to the DSM-5-TR is it now also allows practitioners to
include an additional “behavioral problem” rather than “behavioral disorder” in their diagnosis.
This change has the potential for the practitioner to include in their notes any observed
behavioral concerns despite the child not meeting a complete diagnostic criterion from the DSM
(Stanborough, 2023). This allows the practitioner some freedom in their observations and a
clearer picture of all the child’s behavior.
Benefits and Consequences of the DSM-5-TR Changes in a Home Setting
Practitioners using the DSM-5 could have mistakenly diagnosed people with ASD who
may not meet all the criteria. However, with the addition of the words "all of," the criteria have
become much more clear. While researchers are currently assuming this will not be an issue, only
more research will determine whether the diagnosis rate remains constant. If this does reduce
diagnosis, there may be kids that no longer qualify for early intervention services. This is
concerning because research across all learning disabilities shows that early intervention is key
to the child's future development, and an official diagnosis is needed to access services in the
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
United States (
Volkmar et al., 2012).
In addition, the change of including behavioral problems
may broaden practitioners mind’s to any concerning behavior brought to their attention by
parents rather than dismissing it because it does not fit diagnostic criteria. Because of this
change, anyone collaborating on the child's therapies could get a clearer picture of the child's
needs and create a more helpful intervention plan and increase everyone’s understanding of the
interplay of their child’s behaviors.
Benefits and Consequences of the DSM-5-TR Changes in a School Setting
In a school setting, the more specified criteria in the DSM-5-TR could lead to
underdiagnoses of children that may benefit from accommodation. An official diagnosis is
needed to qualify for 504 and IEP plans, special education aides, and other school services. This
could lead to teachers having to support students on their own or school counselors having to
advocate for services for a student without a diagnosis. If this is the case, there could be life-long
learning consequences for the student for not only their educational outlook but also their self-
esteem. Not receiving school-based services can also harm their ability to interact with their
peers and make them more susceptible to bullying and manipulation. The student having their
needs met would be dependent on the kindness and advocacy of the staff rather than what is
required by law.
Similar to the home setting, with the inclusion of any behavior problems, teachers, school
counselors, and psychologists can now bring additional behaviors to those in charge of diagnosis
or therapies that may not have met previous diagnostic criteria. There may even be behavior
problems that were only exhibited at school that would have been previously missed or not
included. This wording change has the potential to open new collaboration between school and
private therapeutic staff to better support student outcomes.
Conclusion
While it is important to evaluate and revise diagnostic procedures constantly, it is also
essential to consider the impact the revisions will have on those being diagnosed. Quantitative
and qualitative research plays a crucial role in determining if there are any unintended
consequences to revisions of the DSM. Looking at the number of ASD diagnoses, as well as
feedback from parents, school staff, and other stakeholders, is imperative to the process as the
American Psychiatric Association continues to refine its criteria. Unfortunately, the impact of
such revisions cannot be known until the diagnostic criteria have been out for some time. So it is
up to mental health practitioners, researchers, and the American Psychiatric Association itself to
conduct research, listen to feedback in real-time, and make necessary changes for the common
good.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000).
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental
disorders
(4th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.152.8.1228
American Psychiatric Association. (2013b).
Highlights of changes from DSM-IV-TR to DSM-5
.
Psychiatry.org. https://www.psychiatry.org/File
%20Library/Psychiatrists/Practice/DSM/APA_DSM_Changes_from_DSM-IV-TR_-
to_DSM-5.pdf
Hess, P. (2022, March 17).
DSM-5 revision tweaks autism entry for clarity
. Spectrum.
https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/DSM-5-revision-tweaks-autism-entry-for-
clarity/#:~:text=Whereas%20the%20DSM%2D5%20wording,clinicians%20to%20use
%20additional%20diagnostic
Mayes, S. D., Black, A., & Tierney, C. D. (2013). DSM-5 under-identifies PDDNOS: Diagnostic
Agreement between the DSM-5, DSM-IV, and checklist for autism spectrum disorder.
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
,
7
(2), 298–306.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2012.08.011
Oberman, L. M., & Kaufmann, W. E. (2020). Autism Spectrum Disorder Versus Autism
Spectrum Disorders: Terminology, Concepts, and Clinical Practice.
Frontiers in
psychiatry
,
11
, 484.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00484
Stanborough, R. (2023, April 7).
DSM-5TR updates autism diagnostic criteria
. Educational &
Psychological Assessments for Clinicians & Educators.
https://www.wpspublish.com/blog/dsm-5tr-updates-autism-diagnostic-criteria
Volkmar, F. R., Reichow, B., & McPartland, J. (2012). Classification of autism and related
conditions: progress, challenges, and opportunities.
Dialogues in clinical
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
neuroscience
,
14
(3), 229–237.
https://doi-
org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.31887/DCNS.2012.14.3/fvolkmar
Wright, J. (2015, September 4).
DSM-5 redefines autism
. Spectrum.
https://www.spectrumnews.org/opinion/DSM-5-redefines-autism/#:~:text=The%20DSM
%2D5%20also%20combines,show%20restrictive%20and%20repetitive%20behaviors.