Week discussion post - CLDE 5030
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Colorado, Denver *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
5820
Subject
Accounting
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
7
Uploaded by marisol321
REPLIES completed: Weeks 8, 10, 11, 13
Discussion Post
Estrada & Wang (2017) compared the process and results for reclassifying EL students from two different districts in California. Thompson (2017) studied data over the course of several years of students who entered kindergarten as identified EL students in the Los Angeles Unified School District. Both articles conducted studies that found that standards for EL reclassification differ widely and that what constitutes English proficiency is a nebulous, indeterminate measurement and label. Thompson (2017) found that there was an optimal window for in which “students’ likelihood of reclassification rises steadily during elementary school, peaking after students have spent 6 years in the district (when the vast majority of students are in fifth grade). After this peak
at the end of elementary school, students’ likelihood of reclassification drops” (p. 347). Students
are more likely to test out if they have strong initial English proficiency, are young, smart, female, do not come from low-income households, are not in SPED, have educated parents, have
had experienced teachers, quality educational systems, their heart-language is not Spanish-
speaking - because of the correlation between LatinX households and low socioeconomic status (Thompson, 2017, p. 336 and 357). A 2011 CDE report, as cited by Estrada & Wang (2017) found an “apparent discrepancy between the substantial percentage of ELs who meet state guidelines for ELP (37%) and English language arts (ELA) content standards achievement criteria (60%) and the much smaller percentage reclassified FEP (11%)” (p. 209). Reclassification is difficult, complicated, and not always easy to predict; however, those students
who were “reclassified in Grades 2-4 (but not later) showed large gains in ELA test scores and GPA for 7 subsequent years” (Estrada & Wang, 2017, p, 210). The results of delayed EL reclassification is that students may often feel a sense of hopelessness, that the target is moving and there is no real faith that hard work and determination
will make them capable of hitting a difficult, small, moving target. One of the two districts that Estrada & Wang followed didn’t even notify students that they qualified to reclassify but were denied reclassification, so parents and students likely would not even know how close they were and could not contest the results. Working in the dark with no idea of the progress or even of the
objectives could be very detrimental to students’ and families’ morals. Delayed EL reclassification also resulted in denying students opportunities to learn (OTL), thus further handicapping them. EL Curricular Streams “often diminish OTL by omitting or curtailing ELD instruction, limited access to mainstream core content and the full curriculum, and increasing remedial instruction, linguistic and social isolation, and stigmatization” (Callahan & Shifrer, 2012; Dabach, 2014; Dabach & Callahan, 2011; Estrada, 2014a, 2014b; Estrada & Wang, 2013, 2015; Thompson, 2015b, as cited by Estrada & Wang 2017, p.209). Students may also become dependent or reluctant to or fearful of joining the mainstream without their EL peers or without their EL supports. Also, “delays in reclassifying, which can result in permanent EL status” (Estrada & Wang, 2017, p. 209). Estrada & Wang (2017) cited a California State Auditor 2005 report which surveyed eight California school districts and found that 62% of students who met reclassification criteria were not reclassified (p. 210). That means roughly 62% of students who are being denied educational opportunities.
Failure to automate the reclassification resulted in delayed or failure to reclassify EL students. An unnecessarily complicated system requiring signatures and sign-offs by parents and
/ or staff could also delay or deny a s student’s EL reclassification. Also, Carroll and Bailey (2015) as cited by Estrada & Wang (2017) found that “an ELP proficient first criterion, aggregated with content achievement at or above standards resulted in 59% ineligibility for all Els and 30% ineligibility for academically high-performing Els” (p.237, emphasis from original retained). Also, staff who were not trained in reclassification standards and expectations and lack of transparency or understanding of the EL reclassification process also resulted in delayed or denied EL reclassification. The more complicated and the more opportunities for humans to overrule students’ scores resulted in delayed or denied EL reclassification, since school staff, teachers, and even parents have various reasons for denying reclassification. For the most part, most of the teacher or staff generated reasons for denying or delaying reclassification, most of them seem to be based on serving the best possible outcome for the student and working in their best interests – everything from keeping them with their peers, to hoping they would find more academic success with the additional EL supports (Estrada & Wang, 2017, p. 231). Some of the quotes indicate that staff or students didn’t fully understand the process, requirements, expectations, or implications of EL reclassification. Some of the quotes showed that the staff or teachers thought students didn’t deserve
to be reclassified due to “nonacademic factors such as being ‘off task,’ ‘not showing a lot of effort,’ or being a ‘high performer, but spacy’” (Estrada & Wang, 2017, p. 231). I always assume most teachers have positive intentions. However, of all the quotes about why a student’s EL reclassification should be delayed or denied, the one I found the worst was not an actual quote, but the fact that some students were denied because “staff mentioned that schools received additional funds for ELs” (Estrada & Wang, 2017, p. 231), meaning the student was denied for the purposes of acquiring additional funds. My question for my peers: how many of you feel that before beginning this MA in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners, were you aware of or did you really understand the requirements for reclassification of EL status in our state and district? How many of your peers do you think know what the process is? References
Estrada, P., & Wang, H. (2017). Making English Learner Reclassification to Fluent English Proficient Attainable or Elusive: When Meeting Criteria Is and Is Not Enough. American Education Research Journal
. 55(2), 207-242. http://www.doi.org/10.3102/ 0002831217733543.
Thompson, K. (2017). English Learners’ Time to Reclassification: An Analysis. Educational Policy
. 31(3), 330-363. http://www.doi.org/10.1177/08959004815598394.
Nov 11 – Week 12
Both articles this week address the over-representation of emergent bilinguals in special
education, especially for those SPED categories that are based on subjective measures –
“learning disabilities, mental retardation, and emotional disturbance” (Klingner & Artiles, 2003
p. 67). Multi- or bilingual students are also under-represented in gifted programs. Since LatinX
students represent majority of multi- or bilingual students in public education, they were the
focus of many of the studies. Often referrals to special education are made based on
standardized tests that are English only based, and happen without observing the student in the
classroom by someone from the referral process other than the classroom or referring teacher.
Also, the process often doesn’t consider language proficiency in consideration of whether or not
SPED referrals are necessary because “the student’s native language and the number of years of
English instruction that the student had received” (Klingner & Artiles, 2003 p. 68). However,
these two articles seem to offer differing information, since Klinger and Artiles suggested more
observations, but Hoover (2012) seem to indicate that some of the behaviors associated with
multi- or bilingual students who are struggling academically can often traced back to English
language issues as well as cultural differences, and such struggles often manifest in “short-term
behaviors, such as withdrawal, acting out, extended periods of silence, or anxiety” (p. 41). It
seems likely that an observer who saw these behaviors over a short period of time may also
interpret they behavior as indicative of SPED behaviors. Hoover also suggested cultural and
linguistic factors influence instruction should be considered in the referral decision making
process, as well as the CREDE standards for Culturally Responsive Instructional Standards be
practiced in the classroom to help prevent SPED referrals. Most importantly, both articles stated
that the CLDE training of educators and staff is paramount in preventing mis-identification of
multi- or bilingual students as needing SPED services, as well as appropriate testing and referral
requirements that acknowledge differences in performance that are based in second-language
proficiency acquisition. Moll (1990) as cited by Klingner & Artiles, (2003) “recommends
looking for the cultural, linguistic, and social resources – funds of knowledge – that students and
their families bring to the school setting and viewing these as strengths on which to build
problem-solving abilities” (p. 69). However, all these steps are still subject to human error and
lack objective testing, so it is problematic that “the field has not yet adequately determined how
to distinguish between disabilities and normal second-language learning development, nor have
we discovered how to assess students’ true learning potential rather than knowledge acquired
through previous home and school experiences’ (p. 70). Question for my peers: have you seen students who are learning English as a second or third
language but students who are marked or indicated who are labeled as needing SPED services
when they do not need those services, or the other way around? Do you see students who are not
referred to SPED services who may need SPED services but have not been referred because
teachers or other staff assume academic struggles are due to second-language acquisition process
instead of an actual mental or learning disability? “acculturative stress often accompanies the process of acculturation; stress may trigger certain
behaviors that may appear to be a disability (e.g., withdrawal, anxiety) when in reality they are
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
temporary and will subside after student becomes more comfortable with the new environment.”
(Hoover, 2012, p.42). References
Hoover, J. (2012). Reducing Unnecessary Referrals. Teaching Exceptional Children
. 44(4), 38-
47. Klingner, J., & Artiles, A. (2003). When Should Bilingual Students Be in Special Education?.
Educational Leadership
. 61(2), 66-71.
Week 13, Nov 17
This week’s readings were about students who are labeled has being both emerging bilingual and
as having learning deficits. All of the articles advocate for teachers who are in special education
general education or content area, and bilingual educators to work together to better serve
students. The articles also address MTSS instruction, although in my experience students who
are on an IEP are rarely also placed on an MTSS plan, and their IEP is just modified to meet
their needs. Thompson (2015) as cited by Schissel & Kangas (2018) stated that “roughly one in
every three L-TELs in one district have identified disabilities” (p. 568), but that Emerging
Bilinguals on a national scale “are under-represented in special education in comparison to those
from homes where English is the primary language” (Morgan et al, 2015, as cited by Ortiz,
Fránquiz, & Lara, 2020, p. 245). The numbers vary greatly from state to state and by district but
in urban districts in California Emerging Bilinguals were “significantly over-represented in the
upper grades” (Schissel & Kangas, 2018, p. 245). All three articles sight the overlap between
these twice-identified or intersectional students, and since their labels are often based on
students’ performance on standardized tests that are not created to measure emerging bilingual
student’s skills in language because of their monolingual focus or cultural bias. Schissel & Kangas (2018) focused on the process of testing out of the ELL label and how
difficult that is for twice-identified students because “emergent bilinguals with disabilities were
unable to meet reclassification criteria” (p. 568). This inability to shirk their ELL label is based
on a system that doesn’t properly measure their skills because of the misuse or over-reliance of
standardized assessments in which “few appropriate accommodations have been found to be
beneficial for emergent bilinguals” (Schissel & Kangas, 2018, p. 572). Since the tests cannot
accurately measure what students can do, they continue to receive pull-out instruction in both
special education and for English language learning classes, meaning they receive fewer
opportunities to learn deep and rich lessons that would encourage the kind of cognitive,
intellectual growth, and thereby “their collective experience of historic and systemic
disadvantage is profound as reclassification policies and structures often ignore or fail to account
for their distinct education needs as assets” (Schissel & Kangas, 2018, p. 574). As a result,
LTELS are “prone to higher rates of dropping out and limited opportunity in attending post-
secondary education (U.S. Department of Education, 2016; Olsen, 2014, as cited by(Schissel &
Kangas, 2018, p. 582). For these reasons, Schissel & Kangas (2018) advocate for more a
change in reclassification criteria away from standardized assessments.
Emerging bilinguals in general are struggling to find success and catch up with their English-
only speaking peers in a general education classroom because “while 39% of native English
speakers score at or above proficient in reading in the 12
th
grade, 4% of emergent bilingual
students reach this threshold. [while EM students who are on an IEP only ] 8% of the 12
th
graders are at or above proficient in reading” (Golloher, Whitenack, Simpson, & Sacco, 2018, p.
128). While all students with learning disabilities are struggling, and all students who are
Emerging Bilinguals are struggling, students who are both Emerging Bilinguals with learning
disabilities struggle even more. This is partially true because identifying students accurately and
in a timely fashion is difficult. Emerging Bilingual students are more likely to be inaccurately
identified as needing special education because learning English can delay students’ academic
performance in the same ways that those students with a learning disability. Conversely, some
students with an actual learning disability are likely to be missed and their intellectual disabilities
are blamed on the fact that they are just learning English, instead of being accurately diagnosed.
“under-identification would suggest that emergent bilingual students it learning disability may
not be receiving the types of interventions that would address their learning needs […]. At the
same, by the secondary level those students who were currently identified as English learners
were over-represented in special education” (Golloher, Whitenack, Simpson, & Sacco, 2018, p.
129). For these reasons Golloher, Whitenack, Simpson, & Sacco (2018) focused on providing
more MTSS instructional practices for twice-identified students since special education services
do not always meet the unique needs of students who do not speak English as a first language.
For example, in a special education setting “[s]ight-word instruction is often delivered out of
context […] For emergent bilinguals, this can be especially challenging and be in conflict with
instructional methods that call for the teaching of vocabulary in context of the story, lesson, or
activity for emergent bilinguals” (Golloher, Whitenack, Simpson, & Sacco, 2018, p. 136). This
article suggests that these students would be best served if teachers collaborated more including
general, special, and ELD. This sounds like a good idea, but it means that regular content area
teachers, and more specifically English Language Arts teachers will need to do more
modifications, get guidance from both SPED and ELD teachers for instructional techniques and
scaffolds to help students. “As a corollary to this recommendation, we should note that ensuring
that general educators, special educators, and bilingual specialists have adequate time and space
to engage in collaboration suggests a need for administrative support as well” (Golloher,
Whitenack, Simpson, & Sacco, 2018, p. 138). This collaboration sounds lovely, but maybe I am
in an extra cynical mood, but that also seems like the general classroom teacher is being asked to
do more with less, again. Everyone agrees that the goal is to avoid doing “potential harm to
students from their being removed from the general education environment” (Golloher,
Whitenack, Simpson, & Sacco, 2018, p. 140). The process this article suggests for teaching
students from their introductory education classes in college and throughout their academic
teaching careers of not segregating the different teaching specialties seems like a great idea, but
also necessitates a systemic change that seems dauntingly big and challenging, though arguably
necessary. Still, I would say, as a high school English language arts teacher, the onus is often on
me to do all the documenting, modifications, scaffolding, accommodations, etc. and the special
education teacher or ELD teacher, who has never been in my classroom, may come to me after a
unit is completed to tell me what I could have or should have done to help a student, or suggest
time-consuming modifications/ adaptations without really knowing which modifications/
adaptations have already been made. So the general education teacher does all of the planning,
grading, documenting, adjusting, and reassessing while the student, SPED and ELD teacher do
all the second-guessing. I am sure I sound more cynical than I truly feel, but this seems to be
where we are right now – and I have a good relationship and enjoy working with our SPED and
ELD team. I prefer the method of the co-taught class, where the core teacher takes care of the
core instruction, and the SPED or ELD co-teacher takes care of modifications / adaptations, can
help in the grading and documenting, and their expertise can be more readily utilized in planning
and direct instruction as well as for daily, instructional supports. This also has the added benefit
of giving the student of all of the benefits of being in a general education class (with some
modifications), but with the added bonus of more attention, lower teacher-to-student ratios, and
more time in small groups.
If, as Ortiz, Fránquiz, & Lara (2020) state, about 77% of emerging bilingual students are
incorrectly identified as having a learning disability (p. 246), this is a significant number and
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
requires more attention as “inaccurate identification and/or classification has serious
consequences for EB’s including lowering teachers’ expectations for student performance,
regardless of their actual academic performance (Kangas, 2020, as cited by Ortiz, Fránquiz, &
Lara, 2020, p., 246). This article also suggests teachers who collaboratively to plan, modify,
document, assess, and implement instruction specific to the needs of these twice-identified
students. It seems that the biggest hurdle addressed in all three of these articles is that many
teachers and all if not most assessments do not understand the needs and abilities of emerging
bilingual students and often for special needs students and how those are exponentially different
when both needs and abilities intersect in a single student.
My questions for my peers: how many emergent bilingual students have you had who you
suspect are have special needs who are not identified as such? How many emergent bilingual
students have you had who you are identified as having special needs who you believe have been
misidentified because of their English language skills? When do you have students in one or
both of these categories, who does the planning, instruction, modification / accommodations,
grading, and documenting for the students?
References
Golloher, A., Whitenack, D., Simpson, L., & Sacco, D. (2018) From the ground up: Providing
support to emergent bilinguals to distinguish language difference from disability
. Insights
into Learning Disabilities
, 15(2), p. 127-147. Ortiz, A., Fránquiz, M., & Lara, G. (2020) The education of emergent bilinguals with
disabilities: state of practice. Bilingual Research Journal
, 43(3), p. 245-252.
https://10.1080/ 15235882.2020.1823734.
Schissel, J., & Kangas, S. (2018) Reclassification of emergent bilinguals with disabilities: The
intersectionality
of
probabilities.
Language
Policy
,
17,
p.
567-589.
https://doi.org/10.1007 /s10993-018-9476-4.
Related Documents
Related Questions
help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all working
arrow_forward
Jim got 30 questions correct out of a total of 35 what was the percentage of questions he got correct
arrow_forward
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
arrow_forward
The following information is for Cullumber Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2021:
Common shares, Jan. 1
Common shares issued during year
Retained earnings, Jan. 1
Office expense
Dividends declared
Rent expense
Service revenue
Utilities expense
Salaries expense
Income tax expense
(6)
$16,800
8,400
48,720
1,344
4,200
10,416
51,240
2,016
25,200
2,520
arrow_forward
Note:-
• Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
• Answer completely.
• You will get up vote for sure.
arrow_forward
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
arrow_forward
There are two research cases in this assignment. This assignment must be completed by 9:00 a.m. Monday, November 8, 2021. You will submit your answer directly on D2L. You may submit your response in either of the following ways: 1) following the link for the extra credit assignment under Submissions in this week’s content or 2) alternatively, you may follow the link at the top of D2L to Research and Exams. Select Research Assignment #5. (Don’t worry that D2L calls this submission a quiz).
You will enter the Topic, Subtopic, Section, Paragraph in a fill in the blank question and your overall conclusion to this case. Example: ASC 100-10-45-4 (you do not need to enter what the guidance content)
Research Case #1:
Peronto’s Inc. is an asphalt contractor located in Kansas City, Mo. Peronto’s Inc. is planning on expanding into the Chicago market is budgeting that the start-up expenditures for the new Chicago facilities will be $25,000. These expenditures will be for the…
arrow_forward
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Do not provide Excel Screet shot rather use tool table
Answer completely.
arrow_forward
S15-8 Identify ethical standards violated (Learning Objectives 1, 2, & 3) For each of the situations listed, identify the primary standard from the IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice that is violated (competence, confidentiality, integrity, or credibility). Refer to Exhibit 1-7 for the complete standard.
Chris is asked to prepare the GRI report for the year, but he has not attended GRI training. He decides to muddle his way through the report.
George is frustrated because he feels that his company is not moving fast enough to adopt sustainable practices and GRI reporting. He talks to a reporter about some potential environmental fines the company might receive, thinking that if the company is embarrassed publicly, it will move faster on sustainability initiatives.
Kayleigh does not disclose that her brother is the president of the consulting firm her organization is hiring for some GRI reporting work.
Cynthia is a staff accountant at Briar Industries. Since Briar's GRI…
arrow_forward
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
arrow_forward
Note:-
Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism.
Answer completely.
You will get up vote for sure.
arrow_forward
whats the answer in the 2nd number?
arrow_forward
(Part1-3 posted just before)
Comprehensive Problem 1Part 4 and Part 6:
The following is a comprehensive problem which encompasses all of the elements learned in previous chapters. You can refer to the objectives for each chapter covered as a review of the concepts. Note: You must complete parts 1, 2 and 3 before completing parts 4 and 6. Please note that part 5 is optional.
Part 4: At the end of May, the following adjustment data were assembled. Analyze and use these data to complete parts (5) and (6).
a. Insurance expired during May is $275.b. Supplies on hand on May 31 are $715.c. Depreciation of office equipment for May is $330.d. Accrued receptionist salary on May 31 is $325.e. Rent expired during May is $1,600.f. Unearned fees on May 31 are $3,210.
Part 6: Journalize the adjusting entries. Then, post the entries to the attached spreadsheet from part 2.
a. Insurance expired during May is $275.
Date
Account Name
Post. Ref.
Debit
Credit
May 31
b.…
arrow_forward
This window shows your responses and what was marked correct and Incorrect from your prevlous attempt.
Required Informatlon
Problem 13-63 & Problem 13-64 (Algo) (LO 13-5, 6, 7, 9)
The following information applies to the questions displayed below]
Jeremy Slacker started the Del Fuego Surf Shop on January 1 after determining that business school classes conflicted
with his preferred activity. He invested $64,000 in the shop-$50,980 of his own savings and $32,000 borrowed from an
acquaintance. The loan is to be repaid in 5 years. Jeremy will pay the lender annual interest at a rate of 8 percent.
ded
Shortly after opening, Jeremy realized that he is not the best financial planner and has come to you for help. With some
prodding, you are able to establish that Jeremy plans to sell only two models of surfboard, the Zuma and the Coronado,
for at least the first year. Data on the boards are given as follows,
Coronado
) zuma
816
408
Expected annual sales (units)
$720
470
$420
Retail price (per…
arrow_forward
Using the test scores below, create a spreadsheet to determine the students' current grades based upon a
weighted average.
Student Names
Chapter Tests
Midterm
Final
Thomas Tucker
70
86
73
100
55
98
John Smith
57
81 72 92
70
88
Kelli Flores
98
93
100
95
99
97
Rene Sanchez
75
72
83
88
80
80
Jason Floyd
87
91
85
95
88
97
Michael Simmons
95
100
82
78
79
89
Keith Monson
92 0
0
0
0
0
Eric Abrams
100
99
92
96
97
100
Gary Laird
71 100
77
197
100
93
Weighted Averages
Chapter Tests
Midterm
Final
Overall Grade Breakdown
20%
94%-100% A
30%
90%-93% A-
50%
87% 89% B+
84%-86% B
80% 83% B-
77% -79% C+
74% 76% C
70% 73% C-
Below 70% F
Alphabetize the list by last name
• Create an appropriate header using graphics to enhance the appearance
.
Calculate each student's grade using a formula
Round the final grade percentage to the nearest whole percent
⚫ Calculate the the average, minimum, and maximum grade for the class
⚫ Use a nested IF formula to assign letter grades based upon the final percentage…
arrow_forward
Please do not give solution in image format ?
arrow_forward
Assgament: Introduction to
* CengageNOWv2 | Online teachin x
* Mindfap-Cenqage Leaming
n/takeAssignment/takeAssignmentMain.do?invoker=&takeAssignmentSessionLocator=&inprogress=false
它 ☆
Problem 3-43 (LO. 9)
Each year, Tom and Cindy Bates (married filing jointly) normally have itemized deductions of $22,000 (which includes an annual $4,000
pledge payment to their church). On the advice of a friend, they do the following: In early January 2020, they pay their pledge for 2019;
during 2020, they pay their pledge for 2020; and in late December 2020, they prepay their pledge for 2021.
a. What are the Bateses trying to accomplish?
To have their itemized deductions exceed the standard deduction
Feedback
V Check My Work
In most cases, the choice between using the standard deduction and itemizing deductions from AGI is a sinple matter-pick whichever yields
the larger tax benefit. However, taxes might be saved by alternating between the two options by tax planning.
b. What would the Bates' total…
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305627734
Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:9781947172609
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College
Related Questions
- help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all workingarrow_forwardJim got 30 questions correct out of a total of 35 what was the percentage of questions he got correctarrow_forwardNote:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
- The following information is for Cullumber Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2021: Common shares, Jan. 1 Common shares issued during year Retained earnings, Jan. 1 Office expense Dividends declared Rent expense Service revenue Utilities expense Salaries expense Income tax expense (6) $16,800 8,400 48,720 1,344 4,200 10,416 51,240 2,016 25,200 2,520arrow_forwardNote:- • Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. • Answer completely. • You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardNote:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forward
- There are two research cases in this assignment. This assignment must be completed by 9:00 a.m. Monday, November 8, 2021. You will submit your answer directly on D2L. You may submit your response in either of the following ways: 1) following the link for the extra credit assignment under Submissions in this week’s content or 2) alternatively, you may follow the link at the top of D2L to Research and Exams. Select Research Assignment #5. (Don’t worry that D2L calls this submission a quiz). You will enter the Topic, Subtopic, Section, Paragraph in a fill in the blank question and your overall conclusion to this case. Example: ASC 100-10-45-4 (you do not need to enter what the guidance content) Research Case #1: Peronto’s Inc. is an asphalt contractor located in Kansas City, Mo. Peronto’s Inc. is planning on expanding into the Chicago market is budgeting that the start-up expenditures for the new Chicago facilities will be $25,000. These expenditures will be for the…arrow_forwardNote:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Do not provide Excel Screet shot rather use tool table Answer completely.arrow_forwardS15-8 Identify ethical standards violated (Learning Objectives 1, 2, & 3) For each of the situations listed, identify the primary standard from the IMA Statement of Ethical Professional Practice that is violated (competence, confidentiality, integrity, or credibility). Refer to Exhibit 1-7 for the complete standard. Chris is asked to prepare the GRI report for the year, but he has not attended GRI training. He decides to muddle his way through the report. George is frustrated because he feels that his company is not moving fast enough to adopt sustainable practices and GRI reporting. He talks to a reporter about some potential environmental fines the company might receive, thinking that if the company is embarrassed publicly, it will move faster on sustainability initiatives. Kayleigh does not disclose that her brother is the president of the consulting firm her organization is hiring for some GRI reporting work. Cynthia is a staff accountant at Briar Industries. Since Briar's GRI…arrow_forward
- Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardNote:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardwhats the answer in the 2nd number?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...StatisticsISBN:9781305627734Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. AndersonPublisher:Cengage LearningBusiness Its Legal Ethical & Global EnvironmentAccountingISBN:9781305224414Author:JENNINGSPublisher:CengagePrinciples of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College

Essentials of Business Analytics (MindTap Course ...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305627734
Author:Jeffrey D. Camm, James J. Cochran, Michael J. Fry, Jeffrey W. Ohlmann, David R. Anderson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Business Its Legal Ethical & Global Environment
Accounting
ISBN:9781305224414
Author:JENNINGS
Publisher:Cengage
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:9781947172609
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College