Treason trial

the individual's guilt. Instead, it is their job to decide if there is enough evidence to try the defendant. 1. What Makes a Grand Jury Different? A normal jury is known as a petit jury. Encompassing about 6 to 12 people, a typical jury hears trial cases and decides on the facts of a criminal or civil case. A judge presides over the case and decides the legal interpretation. While a judge is still present in a grand jury case, the purpose of the case is different. Federal, county and state cases

In The Outsiders there was a big event where Johnny kills Bob. But first, you have to everything that happened before that event. First when Bob saw Cherry and Marcia with Johnny and the rest of the people that were with him, Bob got mad. So Bob decided to play with them a little. Some people may think Johnny is innocent, or they may think he’s guilty. But for me, I think he is innocent. One reason why I think Johnny is innocent is because he was trying to save Ponyboy. In the text, The Outsiders

(‘Testing the water’) - At the beginning of Twelve Angry Men, the judge told the jury that it was in their hands to find the facts and that the future of a boy was in their hands because the teenager had to go through trial to prove his innocence. During the period of time preceding the trial, the jury members had good manners and were very kind to each other. For instance, they commented about the

Having a jury is both benefits and a shortcomings. One of the most important things about the jury trial is the fact that it is supposed to remain an unbiased third party and be a cross section of society, representing numerous opinions and values of society. However this cannot be the case when you consider all the people that are not allowed to be on a jury. All the people eliminated, challenged, excused; all those who do not fit within the guidelines of being able to sit on a jury. Therefore the

given but found, giving his stories a near parable typology comparable to the bible. In The Trial Kafka tries to tell the reality of the oppressive government that rules over the people who unknowingly feed into it. This story is arguably the one that gave rise to idea of the Kafkaesque, something that is unnaturally confusing or oppressive. The Kafkaesque can be easily used to describe the government in The Trial and even the one we live in today. We live in a world of covert court decisions and secret

• What roles do medical men play in this trial? The involvement of medical men in this trial was purely for the focused attention on medical evidence. The doctor, Mr. Knapp is asked a series of questions regarding the infanticide killing with questions about the process of childbirth. During this time as discussed in lecture, the medical men often were involved in these trials with the focus of showing medical evidence as well as leading to a new appreciated for the mental state of a defendant. During

have been trial by jury where members of the community would gather to pass judgment and analyse findings in regard to stealing disputes. In England and Wales defendants are allowed the right to a trial by a jury which comprise of a group of peers selected at random to consider and evaluate the evidence presented in court, generally in cases of a criminal nature the jury would have to make decision on wether a defendant is guilty or not. WithIn the legal system of England and Wales trials that take

of the fear of each low class individual in order to receive the desired outcome. Everyone’s societal values are already determined for them by the Count and the castle associates, due to this all individuals are living in a poverty like state. The Trial is considered a dystopic, or negative view of modern society. The novel shows the dysfunctional consequences of the forces of modernization on society. Instead of celebrating the city as a beacon of modern living, we get the city as an impoverished

strangers decide your fate? Can you let twelve people that you never met, decide that you are guilty or innocent? Even though the jury system has long been praised as an opportunity for citizens to ensure that justice is properly served in the criminal trial process (Murphy, 2010, p. 212), but it needs fundamental changes to survive in modern Canadian society. The challenge for cause may not be an ideal or even efficient process for determining whether people are biased or not, especially in cases of racial

Topic 1 I think this whole situation was wrong and they should have retried the case. People should not be allowed to use any research finding off of the web especially Wikipedia. Most of the time you aren’t even allowed to use this site in school because it is something that can be edited by the outside public. I think the people who posted the information should face consequences because they impeded on a murder investigation. They should be charged with obstruction of justice. However, I don’t