Petitioner

Theists, people who believe in the existence of God, often are required to pray to God in order to obtain certain benefits and provisions. It is believed that these things wouldn’t come to God’s believers unless they take the role as a petitioner and pray. These believers know God to be an all-loving being. However, if this is the case, a major problem arises for both atheists and theists alike; “Why would God bestow the good only if asked to bestow it” and “Why does God not grant the good irrespective

Petitioner, Kannan S., b/n/f Vijayalakshmi and Kandasami S., by and through the attorney of record, Dorene J. Philpot; Philpot Law Office, P.C.; 7314 Offats Pointe; Galveston, Texas 77551-1228. Respondent, Beaumont Independent School District (“BISD” or the “District”), serves its Objections and Responses Petitioner’s (sic) First Request For Production of Documents. Pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 192 and 196, BISD responds to Petitioner’s First Request for Production of Documents

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA GARY BAPTISTE, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. No. 09-62006-CIV-COHN/WHTE (06-60350-CR-COHN) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. RULES OF CRIM. PROC. 60(b)(4) NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION COMES NOW, Petitioner, Gary Baptiste, (“Petitioner”), in Propria Persona, by way of this document, hereby gives notice to all whom it may concern, that he hereby moves for a Court Order to

I. The District Court’s denial of Petitioners’ Motion to Dismiss is reviewed de novo, and may be affirmed on any ground that is supported by the record. Am. Int'l Enterprises, Inc. v. F.D.I.C., 3 F.3d 1263, 1266 (9th Cir. 1993). Under a de novo standard of review, the appellate court reviews a decision on a question of law anew, and need not give deference to the legal conclusions or assumptions made by the previous court to hear the case. Trinity Indus., Inc. v. Ashland, Inc., 53 S.W.3d 852, 868

In 2009, David Leon Riley was charged due to gang-related video found on his cell phone during the search upon arrest. He argued that police’s warrantless search on his cell phone has violated his Fourth Amendment rights. However, the State of California affirmed the judgment. In the background of Riley’s case, our group conducted a survey to understand UC Davis students’ thoughts about police searching on cell phones upon arrest. Eventually, among the 50 persons surveyed, about half of them

Petitioner Powell was one of seven African-American youths who were convicted of raping two white women. While traveling on a freight train the defendants got into a fight with a group of white youths, which resulted in the defendants throwing the white young men from the train. Two white girls who were aboard the same freight car alleged that six of the seven African-American boys had raped them. At trial, the defendants did not receive the opportunity to consult with their attorneys until right

BACKGROUND: Petitioner Dennys Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”) was stopped by Officer Struble, around midnight, for driving on the shoulder thereby violating a Nebraska statute. Officer Struble issued Rodriguez a warning for the violation. He then asked Rodriguez for consent to a dog sniff around the car, Rodriguez refused, and Officer Struble ordered him out of the car, to facilitate the dog sniff. Rodriguez waited for a backup officer to arrive and the dog sniff was conducted within minutes. The dog

the court case Maryland, Petitioner v. James Kulbicki, James Kulbicki fatally shot his 22-year-old-mistress. Kulbicki shot his mistress on the weekend before he was scheduled for a hearing on unpaid child support, which was tied into a paternity suit between Kulbicki and his mistress. At Kulbicki’s trial, which began in 1995, evidence was presented that the bullet removed from the head of Kulbicki’s mistress matched the bullet fragment that was left in Kulbicki’s truck. FBI Agent Ernest Peele, who

RE THE MARRIAGE OF SALLY BRIGHT PETITIONER V. MEMORANDUM JOHN BRIGHT RESPONDENT Comes Petitioner, by counsel, and for her Memorandum states as follows: I. FACTS Sally Bright (Petitioner), filed for divorce and custody of 14 year old daughter, Chastity. John Bright (Respondent) also requested custody. The court ordered temporary custody of the minor child to Petitioner and visitation with Respondent every weekend. Petitioner will be moving to another part of the country

officers. Id. A traffic stop always poses danger because of its unpredictable nature, but even more so, when a potential suspect is on the loose. Petitioner was a suspect for a crime of several residential break-ins, which a reasonable office would assume is armed and dangerous; thus creating a heightened risk to the officers’ safety. Furthermore, the Petitioner was stopped on the side of a road congested with traffic. If the officers do not maintain control of the situation, any unpredictable movement