John G. Roberts

The Chief Justice of The United States is John G. Roberts. Roberts grew up a very intelligent and well respected young man with a loving family and a hardworking attitude. He has had a long and successful career on his journey to becoming the Chief Justice, with much experience and intelligence in the Justice Department. He has made some very big decisions and will most likely have many more to come. John G. Roberts Jr. was born on January 27, 1955. Although he was born in Buffalo, New York, him

Name and Citation of Case: United States, Missouri v. Mcneely, 569 U. S. (2013) Decision: The Supreme Court attests. The Court noticed that its point of reference requests a case-by-case examination when lower courts figure out if urgent conditions advocated a warrantless pursuit. However, the State contended that exigency essentially exists in any DWI related blood test given that blood-alcohol content quickly decreases with time, the Court found no argumentation to embrace a per se rule. The

The Supreme Court is made up of many justices that believe in two different judicial philosophies. These two philosophies are that of judicial activism and strict constructionism. These philosophies differ quite a bit from one another, but they both work toward the same main goal. Both philosophies play a part in court cases when it comes to deciding on a final ruling. Judicial activism is a judicial philosophy that states that a court has the right to, and should go beyond what is stated in the

1. Who are the people on the Supreme Court? To learn more about them, go to the Web site for the Oyez Project at www.oyez.org and select two Supreme Court justices. The two Justics on the Supreme Court are John G. Roberts, Jr. and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. John G. Roberts, Jr. was appointed on 29 September 2005 by president bush at an age of 50. He is a republican, his confirmation vote was by voice and his ideologies are conservative. On the other hand, President Bill Clinton appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The Supreme Court attests. The Court noticed that its point of reference requests a case-by-case examination when lower courts figure out if urgent conditions advocated a warrantless pursuit. In spite of the fact that the State contended that exigency essentially exists in any DWI related blood test given that blood-alcohol content quickly decreases with time, the Court found no argumentation to embrace a per se rule. The Court concurred that essentially postponing a blood test to get a warrant would

King v. Burwell (2015) is a Supreme Court case involving two parties, the petitioner David King and the respondent Sylvia Mathews Burwell the Secretary of Health and Human Services. In a brief background of the case according to Oyez, Congress passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2010 to increase the number of Americans covered by health insurance and lower health care costs. ACA requires each state to establish an “exchange” in which people can purchase health care; and if a

The legalization of same-sex marriage was a long wait for L.G.B.T citizens, once the Supreme Court ruled and promised that constitution would protect there rights to get married. This decision who hard to make because of the constant debating over whether they should get the chance to get married to someone of the same-sex. The constant debating and protesting put this cause for gay rights at the highest level for many years for same-sex marriage. Anthony M. Kennedy made a decision for same-sex couples

Public Participation and McCutcheon The main idea of this paper is to establish an assimilation of the McCutcheon case. The first goal is to review and summarize the history of the McCutcheon case. The second purpose will be, summing up the majority and minority point of views of this case. This suggests explaining why the chosen argument shows logical and legitimate influence. The third aim focuses on discussing whether the McCutcheon decision improves or demotivates the ability of the public to

lawmakers, aides, and invited guests. The New York Times, referenced some of the people that attended: “Sitting behind Francis were Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and House Speaker John A. Boehner, both Catholics. Flanking the aisle at the front were Secretary of State John Kerry and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., and not far behind them was Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic leader, all Catholics” (Baker, Yardley 17). Others in the audience included three other Supreme Court associate justices

Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor would most likely stick with the argument that this is discrimination of gay Americans, most likely quoting Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith during the proceedings. Chief Justice John G. Roberts would most likely maintain that Masterpiece Cakeshop was not in the wrong. The real decision on whether or not Mr. Phillips was right in refusing to produce a wedding cake for the couple would come down to Anthony M. Kennedy. As Kennedy often