John Barry

The Great Influenza by John Barry gives a panoramic account of the deadly influenza that swept across the globe and left a lasting legacy on human society. Instead of merely describing the cause and effects of the disease, Barry uses the events of the 1918 pandemic to explore how investigators and political leaders in both the national and local levels responded to and confronted the challenges that faced them. The book's overarching argument is that the influenza pandemic of 1918 was a result of

experimental errors. Scientists, especially, will often embrace their passions with certainty that they will discover something worthwhile, ignoring the challenges they may come across. In “The Great Influenza” by John M. Barry, he describes these scientists with the utmost respect. Barry characterizes scientific research as a devoted activity where it is crucial to embrace uncertainty in order to yield solutions; this outlook is seen through his subtle figurative language, specifically, allusions

The book “The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History, written by John M. Barry, covers the progression of the Spanish influenza, especially in the United States. Barry focuses not only on the influenza itself, though, but also on the social influences that allowed the virus to flourish. The book covers how medical practices in the United States had risen up just in time to combat the virus, but, due to societal issues and the war, the doctors struggled in areas where they

the many discoveries that were being made during that time, making the unknown become known. When Barry describes this method, he explains that uncertainty must be made into a tool, to find the courage to accept and “embrace - uncertainty”. However that concept can be very delicate and unrealistic for our world, which is why Barry goes on to explain hypothetical situations to utilize the concept. Barry starts off his explanation by comparing the strength and conviction of uncertainty against the weakness

from the promotion of a more systematic formation of socio-economic relations and class. It later leads to the unrealistic notion that without consumption, there was no healthy economy. These changes can be reflected in the modern development of what Barry believes to be constituted as ideal economic structure compared to what history made us believe. “To those who still uphold the traditions of religious and political thought that influenced the shaping of our society and the founding of our government

Question 2 In the passage from The Great Influenza , John Barry uses rhetorical strategies to appeal to his readers. (1) The author describes the scientific process by implying that uncertainty, in the world of the unknown, must be made an instrument against someone's convictions. In this passage, we read about the working of a scientist and the “certainty” or “uncertainty” scientist have toward an experiment. (2) John Barry characterizes scientific scientific research through the use of syntax

Through a plethora of rhetorical devices, John M. Barry depicts scientists as courageous. As the passage begins, the idea of certainty vs. the obstacle of uncertainty is discussed. While discussing the contrast of these two ideas Barry says, “ certainty creates strength. Certainty gives one something upon which to lean. Uncertainty creates weakness.” and ,“ It is not courage to venture into the unknown. It is the courage to accept - indeed, embrace - uncertainty.” The contrasting ideas of

research without competent scientists? John M. Barry’s The Great Influenza, characterizes scientific research as a commendable venture. Barry uses rhetorical strategies such as repetition, compelling diction, and vivid imagery. These tactics aid the reader’s comprehension of the author’s purpose. The purpose is to convince readers that scientists require certain traits to overcome the challenges of scientific research. The passage in reference suggests that John M. Barry holds scientists in high regard

Author John M. Barry holds strongly on the ever changing world of scientific research. He writes strongly on the views that every experiment will not turn out as planned, every finding may not be as grand as thought, and even that all your work and research, will not always be worth it. Barry feels as though in order to be strong enough for scientific research you have to be prepared to embrace and accept this “uncertainty” that goes along with it. Author John M. Barry writes very strongly about

author John M. Barry Analyzes scientist and their research. He explained the qualities a well rounded scientist should and should not batain, but more importantly the creativity and readiness that a scientist needs to have when facing and exploring the unknown world of science. John M. Barry starts off his article by explaining the difference between certainty and uncertainty within scientist. He elaborates on the qualities a scientist should grasp. Through sentences five to ten barry states