“Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts” is an informative essay by Bruce Catton comparing Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee: the most important military officers in the Civil War. The essay is about how the two officers are very different in values and lifestyles, yet very similar as the two strong leaders come to terms in the end at Appomattox. Catton first describes Robert E. Lee as a very traditional man who embodied aristocratic ideas. Ulysses S. Grant, on the other hand, is described as a modern
Succeeding in History “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts” by Bruce Catton is an essay that compares and contrasts the lives and traits of Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant. Two Civil War leaders in American history who although were very different, were also able to come together and put an end to the Civil War. America was just a land that was staring over with the idea of having an equal chance in the world. Lee born in Virginia, strongly believed in family, culture and tradition. Lee ideally thought
Bruce Catton served in the Navy during World War I, and went on to study the history of the Civil War and write news columns for the nation. Catton’s essay “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts” shows the two very separate lives that future president Ulysses Grant and Robert E Lee, American general were living. On April 9, 1865, Grant and Lee met at the Appomattox Court House in Virginia, where they brought the Civil War to a close. Catton describes each man’s life and upbringing, and how their upbringings
In “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts” by Bruce Catton, the author explores the tremendous challenges that America had faced during a time of opposition and agony. The Civil War not only divided the newly formed country, but led to the death and destruction of innocent lives around the nation. In order to innovate from these tremendous problems, two leaders from opposing armies had met at the Appomattox Court House to discuss surrender. General Robert E Lee of the Confederate army and Ulysses
In Bruce Catton’s historical essay of “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts”, he focuses on the two generals who led opposing armies during the Civil War. Bruce was a respected journalist and his ascendancy influenced the American Civil War. The backbone of the Confederate forces, better known as Robert E. Lee, led the Army of Northern Virginia. Ulysses S. Grant, who became the commander in chief of the Union troops in 1864, would be the commander who finally ended the war. Despite the differences
Ulysses Grant and Robert Lee were vital to the United States during the Civil War. Their meeting in a small parlor in Virginia, where they wrote out and signed the terms of the end of the war, brought the war to its near finish. In the article “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts”, author Bruce Catton analyzes the similarities and differences between these leaders’ points of view and qualities. Thus, author, Bruce Catton compares Grant and Lee to demonstrate that all successful people have the same
Two Narrators in Contrasts Comparing two narrators is very difficult; especially for a person who is not particularly strong in writing. Unfortunately, I consider myself as such a person. However, I will try to compare two narrators, Patricia Park, the author of the essay “Where are you from?” and Bruce Catton, the narrator of “Grant and Lee: a study in contrast.” Even though both their works are comparing and contrasting essays, the narrators use a different narration style, tone and genre
In Bruce Catton’s essay entitled “Grant and Lee: A Study in Contrasts”, he writes about the differences and similarities between two famous Civil War generals. A variety of topics are mentioned, such as the background and personality of each. However, Catton has differing purposes of comparing and contrasting. His purpose for contrasting the two generals is to show how they had different backgrounds growing up, and how they had different wishes for the future they wanted to live in. Catton’s purpose
Bruce Catton does an incredible job of using compare and contrast carefully to express what is on his mind in his essay, "Grant and Lee: A study in Contrasts". He describes the main characters and what they represented. Then towards the end he breaks down the significance of these two vital characters. In order to understand how Catton compared and contrasted this essay to get the point across, we must comprehend what he is trying to point out. He compares Grant and Lee to show how two altogether
How do papers about Civil War generals and cultures differ? More importantly, what do these two pieces have in common? Bruce Catton’s piece, “Grant and Lee: A Study of Contrasts” focuses on the likenesses of Civil War generals Ulysses S. Grant and Robert E. Lee. Meanwhile, Andrea Roman’s essay titled “We’re Not: Why not….?” is a comparison between the cultures of Bolivia and America, through the eyes of a child growing up. These pieces seem unrelated, but how they are related is marvelous, these