Court decisions

of Supreme Court justices by seeking to empirically prove Robert Dahl’s 1957 theory that a justice’s voting typically reflects the policy preferences of the president who appointed them, thereby allowing presidents to achieve their policy goals even after leaving office (pp. 557-558). The authors clarify this by stating that in the event of a clear correlation, concordance should not be considered synonymous with responsiveness. Put simply, the research is not proposing that Supreme Court justices

The task for this week was to discuss how the Supreme Court determines which cases to take on. The case that the Supreme Court takes on varies on many different factors, which must go into consideration prior to them choosing a case. The first step in the decision process of the Supreme Court is chose based on four of the nine justices agreeing to grant the petition. The second factor in the decision process is if the justices decide to take a case if it would resolve a major conflict, for example

We further find persuasive decisions arising from the courts of other jurisdictions that have, by an overwhelming majority, refused to endorse the usurpation of the jurisdiction of a court with concurrent jurisdiction via the failure to permit the matter to be resolved in its original forum. See, e.g., First Midwest Corp. v. Corp. Fin. Assoc., 663 N. W. 2d 888, 892-93 (Iowa 2003) (holding that it was an abuse of discretion to deny stay while matter was pending in neighboring state) (citing Waicker

Landmark Supreme Court Decisions      About 32 years ago, in December of 1965, a group of adults and students from Des Moines, Iowa gathered to show their dislike towards American involvement in the Vietnam War. They decided to wear black armbands and fast on December 16 and 31 to express there point. When the principals of the Des Moines School System found out their plans, they decided to suspend anyone who took part in this type of protest. On December 16

Instructor’s Name Course Date The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker The polarized politics of the Roberts Court article examines the Roberts Court and its relationship to the Obama’s government after the results of midterm elections in 2014. It starts by analyzing the structure of the Court during the past 40 years. The court has been structured by electoral politics and it has been seen to be more conservative, divided and polarized in its decision-making and this reflects the politics of

The International Criminal Court: a Paradox of Coherent Decision Making Processes? Any scholar interested in international governance has probably heard about the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC, based in The Hague, is an international court specialised in investigating and prosecuting actors that have committed “the gravest crimes of concern to the international community” such as genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The ICC has 124 State Members, notably excluding the

Thomas has been on the court since 1991 and has a proven conservative record, Sotomayor is a bit newer to the court and has a more mixed record leaning toward the liberal side on most of the issues, and final there is Gorsuch, the newest member of the court and labeled as a conservative in the spirit in Justice Scalia who he replaced. This section will delve into these preconceived notions about the Justices, and will attempt to put them in perspective as the decision of where they will fall when

-Judicial review is when the court examines a decision of an agency. Judicial Review is conducted to make sure the agency as not violated constitutional rights in the for of procedural due process, substantive due process, and equal protection. Within this process the court also makes sure the court has not acted beyond its delegated powers. 2. Explain how the term judicial review is used generally and in administrative law. -Generally, judicial review is a courts authority to exaamine an executive

Supreme Court is a big part of our lives. Decisions that the Supreme Court has made are sometimes gut turning and makes people upset. They can be very disrespectful and only think about their selves. Some major Supreme Court decisions that impacted the civil rights movement are: Plessy vs Ferguson, Brown vs Board of Education, and Loving vs Virginia. On June 7, 1892, 30-year-old Homer Plessy was jailed for sitting in the white race car of the East Louisiana Railroad. Plessy could easily pass for

Decision-making is at the core of the United States Supreme Court. The justices are not immune to possessing political ideologies and similarly to the American public, those ideologies impact their lives to varying degrees. The facet of judicial politics explored in this paper is decision-making and the impact of ideology. While it would be ideal for the Supreme Court to have zero influences other than the constitution, it is also wishful thinking. Author Jeffrey Toobin agrees with political scientists