Unexamined Life Essay

This documentary had several interesting and well thought out points. Each of the philosophers had very different approaches when it came to life. One of the first quotes of the documentary was, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” This quote was originally said by Socrates - a Greek philosopher. The words were supposedly spoken by Socrates at his trial after he chose death rather than exile. They represent the noble choice which is the choice of death in the face of an alternative. One of

Socrates once said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” He questioned the very nature of why things were the way they were, while never settling for simple, mundane answers. Socrates would rather die searching for the truth than live accepting what he considered a blatant lie. I like to think of myself the same way. I too would rather examine the wonders of life rather than accept what I am just told. The truth is some can’t handle the truth. I on the other hand welcome it with earnest

moral life and talking about the elements that make up a good life. In my judgment, one of the most important things about Socrates ' quest was, indeed, the persistent habit and practice of being critical and thoughtful, not being truly blind to one 's own groundless convictions and assumptions. Contemplation and critical self awareness as a way of worthy life is what Socrates stands for. So, therefore, he adopted questioning people about their knowledge as the foremost maxim for his life, and that

of “conferring honours among themselves” by butting against what they know to be true where the Brahmins neighbor might smile and nod as she continued upon her contented way (Plato, 360 B.C.E). Considering the challenges that Socrates faced in his life for engaging in philosophy and the discontent that the Brahmin has for having not obtained a definitive understanding of the

most important thing in life. More specifically, I will explain the meaning of having a pure soul, and how it causes for other materialistic objects such as being wealthy and having a beautiful body to be of less importance than that of their soul. In the first part of the paper, I will discuss Socrates’s 30a-30b argument. Throughout the rest of the paper I will argue that Socrates’s choice in seeking the best possible state of the soul is the most important thing in life compared to materialistic

Death in American Society Life styles influence death styles. The way that someone once lived, can show in the way they’re buried. Before the turn of the century, “death usually took place in the home” (DeSpelder, Strickland 6). Basically, a coffin was built which was then set up in the parlor of the home. The funeral was held inside the home and friends, acquaintances, and other relatives would come to the family’s home to view the body and share in the act of mourning. Children even sometimes

another question or a new philosophy for his opposite party to ponder. These were the ways of Socrates, an intelligent yet humble man who knew the limits of his knowledge. And through his passion for knowledge and quest for the meaning of life, Socrates often stumbled across the theme of death and dying. Now of course the natural human instinct when presented with the idea of death is to run away from the problem and

tell at the first sip. Correspondingly, our not deep enough physics knowledge should be held accountable for our inability to find out the ingredient of consciousness. Nagel disagrees with reductionists: “It is prima facie highly implausible that life as we know it is the result of a sequence of physical accidents together with the mechanism of natural selection“ (Nagel, 6). The final phase of reductionism thinking is that it eventually reached a point where there is nothing more to be said, except

absurd gratification of power throughout this novel show the incompatibly of the Good Life, a life filled with reflection and realizing that happiness and knowledge are derived from being virtuous. Socrates states in “Apology” that, “The unexamined life isn’t worth living,” (38a). This quote portrays that a life filled with ignorance, materialism, or dominance over others is pointless and irreconcilable with the Good Life. In the “Apology”, Socrates is on trial

consumption. Socrates believed that a person’s job in life is to grow both personally and spiritually. Without growth of the human soul, a person is not able to reach the pure serenity of the examined life. Socrates understood wisdom to be one of the most important virtues a person could possess. Seeking true wisdom entails questioning with logical argument, not just accepting things for what they are worth. Contrary to Socrates, Ivan Ilyich lived a life full of social status and in constant desire for