Editorial Essay Example

to the editor and editorial staff offer position that are supported by both facts and opinions. The letter explores to urges the new reusable bag ordinance while the editorial staff argues that they are serious about making Proposition 328 mandatory in every store. While both side make an acceptable case, it is clear that the letter provides a better argument. First, the example of the stronger argument is that Proposition 328 was not address to the local business. The editorial praise about the

On February 26, at 7:11 pm it was a rainy night in Sanford, Florida when a neighborhood watchman, 28-year-old mixed Hispanic George Zimmerman, calls 911 to report a suspicious person. “This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about” (Genius). That suspicious person was 17-year-old African American Trayvon Martin returning home after stopping by a local convenience store to purchase, the now infamous, Arizona Ice tea

the sporting club. In the editorial, published in the club news (volume 1, issue 1 date unknown) ‘A word from our coach’ club coach ‘Sam’ makes his/her contention on the issue clear: Parents have a responsibility to show their kids what appropriate behaviour is before, during and after the game. ‘Sams’ concerned and disappointed tone is used to bring forward and address these ‘toxic parents’ to stop them from ‘poisoning [their] club.’ ‘Sam’ has written his/her editorial in an appealing way towards

is similar to the June 27th, 2016, edition of the New York Times, where the editorial board writes “A Major Victory for Abortion Rights” and details “...the most significant victory in a generation for a woman’s right to make decisions about her own body…” The writers tell the story of the fight for women's control over their own bodies, particularly the right to choose whether or not to have an abortion. The editorial team uses strongly emotional words, facts and statistics, and a stern, commanding

this quote. Heffernan and other individuals know that what American Medical Association must be important. Throughout this editorial, Heffernan continues to refer to this study. The author continues to refer to this study because Heffernan want emphases how important and serious this topic is. The author could have chosen to use other credibility sources in this editorial but instead the author chose one from American Medical Association. Heffernan could have shown other studies to show creditably

that all parties can agree. To begin, the main issue in the editorial of “The Immigration Law,” published by the New York Times was about creating a new system in which the literacy test was not the only thing taken into consideration. An issue with the central focus of the literacy test is that it doesn’t gear its focus to what is important such as the person’s criminal background. A question that remains unanswered to me by this editorial is, how did this literacy test protect or benefit the United

I found an editorial that had a clear logical fallacy, which was a false dichotomy, in the title of the editorial, but as I read I found a few more invalid arguments. The invalid argument of the editorial that I found, which is titled “If You Don’t Like Either Candidate, Then Vote for Trump’s Policies,” states that voters have two choices: “vote for Trump or help Hillary Clinton get elected.” This invalid argument, written by Wayne Grudem, is a false dichotomy in which Grudem states that voters

be mandatory to prevent mass outbreaks and pandemonium much like the measles outbreak of December 2014. 3In spite of preventable outbreaks, many others deflect the idea of vaccinations because they believe that they are “unsafe”. 4Accoring to the Editorial Board for USA Today, mandatory vaccinations, such as the measles vaccination, are positively affective and only .5% of its recipients have experienced major and crucial side effects. 5Although it is understandable to opt out of a vaccination for

USATODAY, one article that was written by Shanta Driver, “Freedom of Speech Is a Diversion: Opposing View”, is addressing the right of illegal immigrants in America. The second article, “Campus Mobs Muzzle Free Speech: Our View”, written by The Editorial Board, argues the respect of freedom of speech on college campuses. Both articles appeal to the audience’s logic or logos appeal by stating their opinions on why freedom of speech is America’s greatest threat. In her article, “Freedom Speech is

“The Dangers of Affirmative Action” by the Iowa State Daily Editorial Board, the editorial board argues that affirmative action or positive discrimination should not be allowed. The board demonstrates this by