Consequentialism Essay

Sort By:
Page 2 of 50 - About 500 essays
  • Decent Essays

    Consequentialism names a type of ethical theory that judges human practices, like actions or rules, based on their consequences. Human practices that produce good consequences are morally right, while ones that produce adverse consequences are morally wrong. For example, a consequentialist says that you should do certain things, because those actions produce good consequences. The most common historical variant of consequentialism is Classic Utilitarianism. Classic Utilitarianism was promoted philosophers

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Explain how the movie deals with consequentialism and non-consequentialism, particularly in the role the “Pre-Cogs” play in the movie and the idea behind Pre-Crime. Consequentialism can be defined simply as being concerned with the consequences of an act or event. Consequences are of greater priority than the act itself. This is a means justifies the end view of things. There are two main forms of consequentialism, egoism and utilitarianism. The movie mostly showcases the latter form. Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    reading Jim and the Indians I feel like Jim should just kill one of the Indians himself so that the rest of the Indians will be let off. Consequentialism is holding consequences of one’s conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about rightness or wrongness of that conduct. Also, consequentialism is do good as much and as often as you can. Consequentialism is primanly non-prescriptive meaning the moral worth of an action is determined by its potential consequence, not whether it follows a set

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay about Consequentialism: The Global Poor

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    do about it?” and “should we even do something about it?”. In this essay, I will be arguing the moral implications of consequentialism and why Onora O’Neill’s non-consequential view on the subject is more plausible than Peter Singer’s consequential view. I will explain what differentiates Singer and O’Neill’s views and where both their views come together. Consequentialism refers to the idea that what is morally good or bad is all based on the consequences of one’s actions. It is derived from

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Consequentialist and non- consequentialist Consequentialist : Consequentialist or teleological consideration is about result of an action, which can affect an act by an individual or a group. ( T&K, p.30). There are two types of major consequentialist ethical theories are ethical egoism and Utilitarianism. Universal E/E: everyone should act in their own self interest, the consequences of an action will affect all the parties involved. Universal egoist refers for all of us or for all human being

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequences of Climate Change: Consequentialism and Environmental Ethics A somewhat commonly held concern is that consequentialism is an inadequate moral theory for tackling issues of environmental ethics. In this paper I will argue that consequentialism can successfully respond to climate change by, at times, evaluating the morality of character traits instead of actions. First, I will provide a couple major objections that consequentialism must overcome if it is to be successful in addressing

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Consequentialism is a philosophical theory which centers on leaving the world, or state of affairs, in the best state possible. Consequentialism embodies the saying, “does the end justify the means.” Consequentialists believe that a person should not worry about the actions, which they must partake in as long as the consequences of those actions lead to the best possible outcome available to them. The theory does not stop at individual actions, it goes further to include the actions of others, when

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Consequentialism is a class of ethical theories stating that the consequences of one’s actions are the superior judge as far as to what is right or wrong, moral or immoral. The doctrine of Utilitarianism falls under the umbrella of consequentialism and suggests that actions are right if they are deemed as useful or are for the benefit of the majority. Alongside that, Utilitarians argue that everyone counts and everyone counts equally. This imposes that each being, belonging to the moral community

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    To analyze the dilemma one must understand how a consequentialist and a deontological would come to their conclusions. A basic difference is the consequentialist would believe the end justifies the means. A deontologist would conclude that irrespective of outcomes, the method or means should conform to a stricture or rule set. The consequentialist is focused on the consequences of the action. If the end result provides more good than bad, they would conclude the action justifies the end result

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kai Nielsen’s Support of Consequentialism and Rejection of Deontology Kai Nielsen defended consequentialism and showed how it can still agree with commonsense, deontological convictions in his article “Traditional Morality and Utilitarianism.” His article focused on closing the gulf between consequentialism and deontology by showing how closely they can agree, and he further evaluated the systems and found that consequentialism as he sees it should be practiced is morally superior to traditional

    • 1484 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays