The article “Reaction Modeling and Optimization Using Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms: Case Study Involving TS-1-Catalyzed Hydroxylation of Benzene” (S. Nandi, P. Mukherjee, et al., Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002:2159–2169) presents benzene conversions (in mole percent) for 24 different benzenehydroxylation reactions. The results are
52.3 41.1 28.8 67.8 78.6 72.3 9.1 19.0
30.3 41.0 63.0 80.8 26.8 37.3 38.1 33.6
14.3 30.1 33.4 36.2 34.6 40.0 81.2 59.4.
- a. Can you conclude that the mean conversion is less than 45? Compute the appropriate test statistic and find the P-value.
- b. Can you conclude that the mean conversion is greater than 30? Compute the appropriate test statistic and find the P-value.
- c. Can you conclude that the mean conversion differs from 55? Compute the appropriate test statistic and find the P-value.
a.
Check whether there is evidence to conclude the mean conversion is less than 45.
Answer to Problem 3E
There is no evidence to conclude that the mean conversion is less than 45.
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data represents the benzene conversions (in mole percent) for 24 different benzene hydroxylation reactions.
Calculation:
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
Here, the sample size is large. That is, n = 24.
The formula for z-score is,
The positive and negative ranks are calculated as follows:
x | Signed ranks | |
52.3 | 7.3 | 5 |
41.1 | –3.9 | –1 |
28.8 | –16.2 | –14 |
67.8 | 22.8 | 17 |
78.6 | 33.6 | 21 |
72.3 | 27.3 | 19 |
9.1 | –35.9 | –23 |
19 | –26 | –18 |
30.3 | –14.7 | –12 |
41 | –4 | –2 |
63 | 18 | 15 |
80.8 | 35.8 | 22 |
26.8 | –18.2 | –16 |
37.3 | –7.7 | –6 |
38.1 | –6.9 | –4 |
33.6 | –11.4 | –9 |
14.3 | –30.7 | –20 |
30.1 | –14.9 | –13 |
33.4 | –11.6 | –10 |
36.2 | –8.8 | –7 |
34.6 | –10.4 | –8 |
40 | –5 | –3 |
81.2 | 36.2 | 24 |
59.4 | 14.4 | 11 |
From the table, the sum of positive ranks is,
The test statistic is calculated as follows:
Thus, the test statistic is –0.46.
P-value:
Software Procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the P- value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Probability Distribution Plot choose View Probability > OK.
- From Distribution, choose ‘Normal’ distribution.
- Click the Shaded Area tab.
- Choose X Value and Left Tail for the region of the curve to shade.
- Enter the data value as –0.46.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the P-value is 0.3228.
Decision rule:
If
If
Conclusion:
Here, the P-value is greater than the level of significance, 0.05.
Therefore, the null hypothesis is not rejected.
Hence, there is no evidence to conclude that the mean conversion is less than 45.
b.
Check whether there is evidence to conclude that the mean conversion is greater than 30.
Answer to Problem 3E
There is evidence to conclude that the mean conversion is greater than 30.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The positive and negative ranks are calculated as follows:
x | Signed ranks | |
52.3 | 22.3 | 17 |
41.1 | 11.1 | 14 |
28.8 | –1.2 | –3 |
67.8 | 37.8 | 20 |
78.6 | 48.6 | 22 |
72.3 | 42.3 | 21 |
9.1 | –20.9 | –16 |
19 | –11 | –12.5 |
30.3 | 0.3 | 2 |
41 | 11 | 12.5 |
63 | 33 | 19 |
80.8 | 50.8 | 23 |
26.8 | –3.2 | –4 |
37.3 | 7.3 | 9 |
38.1 | 8.1 | 10 |
33.6 | 3.6 | 6 |
14.3 | –15.7 | –15 |
30.1 | 0.1 | 1 |
33.4 | 3.4 | 5 |
36.2 | 6.2 | 8 |
34.6 | 4.6 | 7 |
40 | 10 | 11 |
81.2 | 51.2 | 24 |
59.4 | 29.4 | 18 |
From the table, the sum of positive ranks is,
The test statistic is calculated as follows:
Thus, the test statistic is 2.84.
P-value:
Software Procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the P- value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Probability Distribution Plot choose View Probability > OK.
- From Distribution, choose ‘Normal’ distribution.
- Click the Shaded Area tab.
- Choose X Value and Right Tail for the region of the curve to shade.
- Enter the data value as 2.84.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the P-value is 0.0023.
Conclusion:
Here, the P-value is less than the level of significance, 0.05.
Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is evidence to conclude that the mean conversion is greater than 30.
c.
Check whether there is evidence to conclude that the mean conversion differs from 55.
Answer to Problem 3E
There is evidence to conclude that the mean conversion differs from 55.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
State the test hypotheses.
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The positive and negative ranks are calculated as follows:
x | Signed ranks | |
52.3 | –2.7 | –1 |
41.1 | –13.9 | –5 |
28.8 | –26.2 | –19.5 |
67.8 | 12.8 | 4 |
78.6 | 23.6 | 15 |
72.3 | 17.3 | 9 |
9.1 | –45.9 | –24 |
19 | –36 | –22 |
30.3 | –24.7 | –16 |
41 | –14 | –6 |
63 | 8 | 3 |
80.8 | 25.8 | 18 |
26.8 | –28.2 | –21 |
37.3 | –17.7 | –10 |
38.1 | –16.9 | –8 |
33.6 | –21.4 | –13 |
14.3 | –40.7 | –23 |
30.1 | –24.9 | –17 |
33.4 | –21.6 | –14 |
36.2 | –18.8 | –11 |
34.6 | –20.4 | –12 |
40 | –15 | –7 |
81.2 | 26.2 | 19.5 |
59.4 | 4.4 | 2 |
From the table, the sum of positive ranks is,
The test statistic is calculated as follows:
Thus, the test statistic is –2.27.
P-value:
Software Procedure:
Step-by-step procedure to obtain the P- value using the MINITAB software:
- Choose Graph > Probability Distribution Plot choose View Probability > OK.
- From Distribution, choose ‘Normal’ distribution.
- Click the Shaded Area tab.
- Choose X Value and Both Tail for the region of the curve to shade.
- Enter the data value as –2.27.
- Click OK.
Output using the MINITAB software is given below:
From the MINITAB output, the P-value for two tailed test is,
Conclusion:
Here, the P-value is less than the level of significance, 0.05.
Therefore, the null hypothesis is rejected.
Hence, there is evidence to conclude that the mean conversion differs from 55.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 6 Solutions
Statistics for Engineers and Scientists
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Elementary & Intermediate Algebra
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th Edition)
Precalculus
A Problem Solving Approach To Mathematics For Elementary School Teachers (13th Edition)
- Toxaphene is an insecticide that has been identified as a pollutant in the Great Lakes ecosystem. To investigate the effect of toxaphene exposure on animals, groups of rats were given toxaphene in their diet. The article “Reproduction Study of Toxaphene in the Rat” (J. of Environ. Sci. Health, 1988: 101–126) reports weight gains (in grams) for rats given a low dose (4 ppm) and for control rats whose diet did not include the insecticide. The sample standard deviation for 23 female control rats was 32 g and for 20 female low-dose rats was 54 g. Does this data suggest that there is more variability in low-dose weight gains than in control weight gains? Assuming normality, carry out a test of hypotheses at significance level .05.arrow_forward1.“Effects of Short-Term Supplementation with Selenised Yeast on Milk Production and Composition of Lactating Cows”(Australian Journal of Dairy Technology, [2004]: 199-203) supplied the following data on milk selenium concentration (mg/L) for a sample of cows given seleniumsupplement (the treatment group) and a sample of cows given no supplement (the control group). The measurements of selenium were taken initally and again after a 9-day period. The study was conducted becausea deficiency of the trace element selenium in the diet can negatively impact growth, immunity, muscle and neuromuscular function, and fertility. The production of selenium supplements to dairy cows is justified when pastures have low selenium levels. data is attached a.Use the given data for the treatment group to determine if there is sufficient evidenceto conclude that the mean selenium concentration is greater after 9 days of the selenium supplement. b.Are the data for the cows in…arrow_forwardOne of the issues facing organizations is increasing diversity throughout an organization. One of the ways to evaluate an organi- zation's success at increasing diversity is to compare the percentage of employees in the organization in a particular position with a specific background to the percentage in a particular position with that specific background in the general workforce. Recently, a large academic medical center determined that 9 of 17 employees in a particular position were female, whereas 55% of the employees for this position in the general workforce were female. At the 0.05 level of significance, is there evidence that the proportion of females in this position at this medical center is different from would be expected in the general workforce?arrow_forward
- The article "Factorial Experiments in the Optimization of Alkaline Wastewater Pretreatment" (M. Prisciandaro, A. Del Borghi, and F. Veglio, Industrial Engineering and Chemistry Research, 2002:5034-5041) presents the results of an experiment to investigate the effects of the concentrations of sulfuric acid (H,So,) and calcium chloride (CaCl,) on the amount of black mud precipitate in the treatment of alkaline wastewater. There were three levels of each concentration, and two replicates of the experiment were made at each combination of levels. The results are presented in the following table (all measurements are in units of kg/m). H;5O, CaCl, 15 Precipitate 100.2 110 98.2 110 30 175.8 216.5 176.2 110 45 206.0 123 15 110.5 105.5 123 30 45 184.7 189.0 123 234.0 222.0 136 15 106.5 107.0 136 30 1817 189.0 136 45 211.8 201.3 a Construct an ANOVA table. You may give ranges for the P-values. b. Is the additive model plausible? Explain. c. Can you concude that H,S0, concentration affects the…arrow_forward6-30. + An article in Technometrics (1977, Vol. 19, p. 425) presented the following data on the motor fuel octane ratings of several blends of gasoline: 88.5 98.8 89.6 92.2 92.7 88.4 87.5 90.9 94.7 88.3 90.4 83.4 87.9 92.6 87.8 89.9 84.3 90.4 91.6 91.0 93.0 93.7 88.3 91.8 90.1 91.2 90.7 88.2 94.4 96.5 89.2 89.7 89.0 90.6 88.6 88.5 90.4 84.3 92.3 92.2 89.8 92.2 88.3 93.3 91.2 93.2 88.9 91.6 87.7 94.2 87.4 86.7 88.6 89.8 90.3 91.1 85.3 91.1 94.2 88.7 92.7 90.0 86.7 90.1 90.5 90.8 92.7 93.3 91.5 93.4 89.3 100.3 90.1 89.3 86.7 89.9 96.1 91.1 87.6 91.8 91.0 91.0 Construct a stem-and-leaf display for these data. Calculate the median and quartiles of these data.arrow_forward20)arrow_forward
- 40. In a study of processes used to remove impurities from cellulose goods ("Optimization of Rope- Range Bleaching of Cellulosic Fabrics," Textile Research J., 1976: 493-496), the following data resulted from a 2 experiment involving the desiz- ing process. The four factors were enzyme concentration (A), pH (B), temperature (C), and time (D). Starch % by Weight En- Treat- zyme ment (gL) pH (C) Temp. Time 1st 2nd (hr) Repl. Repl. (1) a. b. 60.0 60.0 60.0 6. 9.80 14.04 6. 50 .75 50 .75 50 .75 50 75 50 6.0 6.0 9.72 13.50 10.13 11.27 7.0 60.0 70.0 ab 7.0 6. 11.80 11.30 6.0 6. 12.70 11.37 ac 6.0 70.0 6. 11.96 12.05 6. 11.38 9.92 70.0 70.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 be 7.0 7.0 abc. 6. 11.80 11.10 13.15 13.00 10.60 12.37 10.37 12.00 11.30 11.64 13.05 14.55 11.15 15.00 6.0 .75 ad bd abd 6.0 50 .75 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 7.0 cd acd 50 .75 50 8. 12.70 14.10 13.20 16.12 bcd abcd .75 a Use Yates's algorithm to obtain sums of squares and the ANOVA table. b. Do there appear to be any…arrow_forward10.1-2 9arrow_forwardThe article "Effect of Refrigeration on the Potassium Bitartrate Stability and Composition of Italian Wines" (A. Versari, D. Barbanti, et al., Italian Journal of Food Science, 2002:45- 52) reports a study in which eight types of white wine had their tartaric acid concentration (in g/L) measured both before and after a cold stabilization process. The results are presented in the following table: Wine Type Before After Difference 2.86 2.59 0.27 2.85 2.47 0.38 3 1.84 1.58 0.26 4 1.60 1.56 0.04 0.80 0.78 0.02 6. 0.89 0.66 0.23 2.03 1.87 0.16 1.90 1.71 0.19 Find a 95% confidence interval for the mean difference between the tartaric acid concentrations before and after the cold stabilization process.arrow_forward
- The management of a supermarket wants to find if there is a relationship between the number of times a specific product is promoted on the intercom system in the store(x) and the number of units of that product sold (y). To experiment, the management selected a product and promoted it on the intercom system for 7 days, recording the number of times this product was promoted each day and the number of units sold. Summaries of a study conducted gave the following results: ∑x=177, ∑y= 144, SSxx=809.4286, SSyy=261.7143, SSxy= 407.8571 a) Calculate the correlation coefficient (r) relating number of times this product was promoted each day and the number of units sold. b) Find the regression line.arrow_forwardAn article in Environment International ["influence of Water Temperature and Shower Head Office Size on the release Radon During Showering" (1992, Vol. 18(4)] described an experiment in which the amount of radon released in showers was imvestigated. Radon-enriched water was used in the experiment, and six different orifice diameters were tested in shower heads. The data from the experiment are shown in the following table. 5. Orifice Diameter 0.37 0.51 0.71 1.02 Radon Released () 83 75 73 72 83 85 79 79 74 76 77 67 74 74 1.40 62 62 67 69 1.99 60 64 66 (a) Does the size of the orifice affect the mean percentage of radon released? Use a=0.05. (b) Find a 95% confidence interval on the mean percent of radon released when the orifice diameter is 1.40.arrow_forwardThe authors of a paper compared two different methods for measuring body fat percentage. One method uses ultrasound, and the other method uses X-ray technology. The table gives body fat percentages for 16 athletes using each of these methods (a subset of the data given in a graph that appeared in the paper). For purposes of this exercise, you can assume that the 16 athletes who participated in this study are representative of the population of athletes. Athlete 0 Ho: Md = Ha: Md 0 < 0 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 X-ray 4.75 7.00 9.25 12.00 17.25 29.50 5.50 6.00 8.00 8.50 9.25 11.00 12.00 14.00 17.00 18.00 USE SALT Ultrasound 4.75 4.00 9.00 11.75 17.00 27.75 6.50 6.75 8.75 9.75 9.50 12.00 12.25 15.75 18.00 18.50 X Find the test statistic and P-value. (Use a table or SALT. Round your test statistic to one decimal place and your P-value to three decimal places.) t = P-value = 0.000 Mx-ray ultrasound.)arrow_forward
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman