The incentive to find loopholes to reduce the federal tax liabilities and its difference from 91% federal personal income tax bracket to 15% federal personal income tax bracket.
Concept introduction:
Marginal income tax rate:
It is defined as the amount of tax paid on every external dollar of income. When the income rises, the marginal tax rate of a person also rises. This means that the person with low income are taxed low and those with high income are taxed high.
Federal income tax rate:
It is a type of progressive tax which is imposed by the federal government, states, and the local body in the United States. This means that as the income increases, the tax rate also increases.
Explanation:
- When the federal tax is 91%, then the people would try to find every possible way to evade taxes. During 1951, 91% of the federal tax meant for every additional income of $1,91 cents were paid as tax and only 9 cents were left as disposable income.
- This meant that the cost associated with the tax evasion is less than the benefit. So, people used to find legal loopholes to evade taxes.
- When the federal tax is 15%, then the people have no incentive to evade taxes. 15% of the federal tax means that for every additional income of $1, 15 cents are paid as tax and 85 cents are left as disposable income.
- This means that the cost associated with the tax evasion is more than the benefit. So, people prefer to pay tax rather than to evade it. The cost of evasion that is fines, punishments, and penalties are very high, as compared to high federal taxes.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 14 Solutions
Economics of Public Issues (20th Edition) (The Pearson Series in Economics)
- O'Reilly's financial analysis trends for 2022, 2023, and 2024arrow_forwardFind the equation of the price offer curve and demand curve for the following utility function: U= min (3x, 2y). Let income of the consumer be M, price of good X is Px and price of good Y be Py. Also draw both the curves. (b) Let utility function of a consumer be given by U(x,y) = xy + x, where X and Y are the two goods (i) Is marginal rate of substitution diminishing? (ii) Are marginal utilities of both goods X and Y diminishingarrow_forwardx, y) = 2√x + y. Let price of X be $0.50, price of Y be $1 and income is $10. (i) Find initial equilibrium of the consumer. (ii) Find the new equilibrium if price of X falls to $0.20. (iii) Using Hicksian technique decompose the price effect into substitution and income effectsarrow_forward
- Price elasticity by the hour of day. Average parking occupancy rates of 2011 (i.e., after the rate change) in neighborhoods with a decrease, no change and an increase in rates are also displayed in this figure. 0.0 -0.1 E I -0.2 a S -0.3 t i -0.4 C i -0.5 t Y -0.6 -0.7 -0.8 Hour of the day 60 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 -0.9 -Decrease price elasticities model 1 → Decrease neighborhoods' occupancy in 2011 ...... No price change neighborhoods' occupancy in 2011 Increase price elasticities model 1 ⚫ Increase neighborhoods' occupancy in 2011 50 8333PONG> 40 40 30 20 20 a n C Y 30 10 0 (0°) ૪ Based on the figure showing estimated elasticities after the price increase, what times of day have the most elastic parking demand? Why do you think this is the case? Explain.arrow_forwardFinancial analysis 2022, 2023, and 2024 for O' Reilly's trends in dataarrow_forward9-5. In a replacement analysis for a vacuum seal on a spacecraft, the following data are known about the challenger: the initial investment is $12,000; there is no annual maintenance cost for the first three years, however, it will be $2,000 in each of years four and five, and then $4,500 in the sixth year and increasing by $2,500 each year thereafter. The salvage value is $0 at all times, and MARR is 10% per year. What is the economic life of this challenger? (9.5)arrow_forward
- 9-4. A vehicle costs $30,000 and incurs maintenance costs. increasing by $500 annually, starting at $1,000 in year one. When is it economical to replace it, assuming no salvage value? Use a MARR = 8% per year.arrow_forward9-14. Analyze the replacement of an old crane with $7,000 annual maintenance and a $30,000 current market value with a new one for $100,000 and $2,000 annual maintenance. The MARR is 15% per year.arrow_forward9-15. A small high-speed commercial centrifuge has the following net cash flows and abandonment values over its useful life (Table P9-15, p. 454). The firm's MARR is 12% per year. Determine the optimal time for the centrifuge to be abandoned if its current MV is $9,500 and it won't be used for more than five years. (9.8)arrow_forward
- Balance sheet, income statement and statement of cash flow 2022, 2023, and 2024 for AutoZone and trend analysisarrow_forward9-1. An existing machine with a book value of $10,000 has maintenance costs of $2,000 per year. A new machine costs $25,000 with annual maintenance costs of $500. When should the existing machine be replaced? The company's MARR is 15% per year.arrow_forward9-3. Analyze replacing a commercial oven with $800 annual maintenance and a $3,000 salvage value with a new one for $15,000 and $300 annual maintenance. The company's MARR is 12% per year.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education