Would you be able to help me with question 2.7 part C? I'm struggling with this problem and would really appreciate assistance in constructing a state diagram for the push-down automaton for part C. question for 2.7 2.7 Give informal English descriptions of PDAs for the language. c. {w#x | w R is a substring of x for w, x ∈ {0,1} ∗ }

Can you please help me with question 2.7 part B because I am struggling with this problem that I just don't understand. Can you please do a state diagram for the push down automaton for part B. question for 2.7 2.7 Give informal English descriptions of PDAs for the language. B. The complement of the language {a^n b^n | n ≥ 0}

Q.No.4: What is K-Map Method, for which purpose K-Map is used? What are its advantages and disadvantages? Also explain grouping rules while making a K-Map for a Boolean expression along with examples for each rule?

Code in C++  only. Correct answer will upvoted else downvoted.   framework of size n×m, with the end goal that every cell of it contains either 0 or 1, is considered lovely if the total in each adjoining submatrix of size 2×2 is actually 2, i. e. each "square" of size 2×2 contains precisely two 1's and precisely two 0's. You are given a network of size n×m. At first every cell of this network is unfilled. How about we indicate the cell on the crossing point of the x-th line and the y-th segment as (x,y). You need to handle the inquiries of three sorts: x y −1 — clear the cell (x,y), in case there was a number in it; x y 0 — compose the number 0 in the cell (x,y), overwriting the number that was there already (assuming any);  x y 1 — compose the number 1 in the cell (x,y), overwriting the number that was there beforehand (assuming any). After each question, print the number of ways of filling the unfilled cells of the grid so the subsequent network is delightful. Since the appropriate…

I want in c++ code and output. Detail answer only. Else you will get multiple downvote.   The world you live in is a goliath 109×109 lattice, with squares having the two directions somewhere in the range of 1 and 109. You realize that the adversary base has the state of a square shape, with the sides corresponding to the sides of the matrix. Individuals of your reality are incredibly frightened of being at the edge of the world, so you realize that the base doesn't contain any of the squares on the edges of the network (the x or y organize being 1 or 109). To assist you with finding the base, you have been given a gadget that you can put in any square of the network, and it will let you know the manhattan distance to the nearest square of the base. The manhattan distance from square (a,b) to square (p,q) is determined as |a−p|+|b−q|. In the event that you attempt to put the gadget inside the foe base, you will be caught by the foe. Along these lines, you need to make a point to never…

Explain and solve step-by-step. Question: Write a Java for loop denotational semantics mapping function. Explain every step!

I'm having a hard time with section 2.5 part B. Despite multiple attempts, I can't seem to get it right. To address part B of 2.5, the question from 2.4 is required. The issue pertains to pushdown automata, and it would be immensely helpful if you could provide a visual representation illustrating the process you used to arrive at your solution. I've included my incorrect answer for your reference. Could you assist me in pinpointing why my approach is flawed? My focus is solely on resolving the problem with question 2.5 part B. question for 2.5 2.5 Give informal descriptions and state diagrams of pushdown automata for the languages in Exercise 2.4. question for 2.4 that you will need for 2.5 2.4 Give context-free grammars that generate the following languages. In all parts, the alphabet Σ is {0,1}. b. {w| w starts and ends with the same symbol}

Give a description of a TM M, that recognizes language D = {w over {0, 1}*| w contains twice as many 0's as l's}. For example: 010 E D, 000011 E D, and 0110 € D. In this case, you are free to use in your description traditional or any variation of TM we have covered in class. • In addressing be sure to pay special attention to final (halting) configurations, when required. you are expected to provide pseudocode for the corresponding machines. Remember that in your pseudocode, you need to be clear of what are your reading and writing on the tape (and which tape if you use more than 1), the direction in which the tape heads will move, and when the Turing Machine should halt and accept and/or halt and reject. Having said that, the point is not for you to describe state-by-state what the Turing Machine would look like. Instead, the goal of the description is for you to offer a high level overview that considers what to read/write in which order, in which directions the tape would move and…

IN HASKELL PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE PLEASE     In case you do not know it: the game is played on a 3x3 grid that is initially empty. Two players are playing, by alternatingly making moves. A move by a player places their token (an X for player 1, an O for player 2) into a cell that was empty. We are using algebraic notations for indexing the positions in the board, with A,B,C indexing the columns and 1,2,3 the rows. Specifically, these coordinates would be used in the implementation for moves made by a human player. If the X X O Figure 1: Sample board position same token appears 3 times in any of the three columns, three rows or two main diagonals the game is over and that player wins. If the grid is filled without that happening the game is a draw. For the depicted board, we have Xs in positions C3 and A2, and an O in position B1. It would be O’s turn to make a move; a legal move would be C2, but it is not a good move, because X can force a win by responding A1. O cannot force a win, but…

Use the Pumping Lemma to show the following language L is NOT regular. L= {w E (a, b, c}* ; where w has equal number of a's, b's, and c's}