Related questions
Question
With reference to contract law terms: Define exclusion clauses and what their effect is.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Select the statement that describes how bilateral and unilateral contracts are alike and different. Both contract types involve two parties. But in bilateral contracts, both parties make a promise; in unilateral contracts, only one party does. Both are valid contract classifications, but only bilateral contracts involve two parties. Both are valid contract classifications, but only unilateral contracts involve two parties. Both contract classifications involve two promises, but only bilateral contracts involve two parties.arrow_forwardBusiness law-arrow_forwardExplain the process and legal requirements involved in drafting and enforcing contracts in business transactions.arrow_forward
- 16. Why are restrictive covenant clauses controversial? They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms that restrict their future right to alter those same contracts They are controversial because they allow people to create contract terms below the otherwise legislated minimum standards of work They are controversial because they seem to pit two legitimate interest against each other: the right of trade against the right of contractarrow_forwardUnder the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which of the following remedies is available to both buyers and sellers? Select one: a. Recovering the total value of goods in the contract b. Recovering profit from the resale of nonconforming goods by the other party c. Damages in the amount of the difference between the contract price and the market price of goods d. Obtaining specific performance of the contractarrow_forwardEconomics - business law.arrow_forward
- Conditions precedent Multiple Choice Render a contract frustrated Render a contract void at the option of the injured party Must occur before a contract can be cancelled Must occur before a contract is enforceable Render a contract void immediatelyarrow_forwardWhich of the following is true regarding whether the buyer and seller may negotiate contractually for a shorter time period to sue for breach of contract than the statute of limitations period ordinarily recognized by the Uniform Commercial Code? Multiple Choice The buyer and seller may not negotiate for a shorter time period to sue for breach of contract, instead, they must recognize the statute of limitations period established by the Uniform Commercial Code. Without limitation, the buyer and seller may negotiater a shorter time period to sue for breach of contract than the statute of limitations period ordinarily recognized by the Uniform Commercial Code. The buyer and seller may negotiate for a shorter time period to sue for breach of contract than the statute of limitations period ordinarily recognized by the Uniform Commercial Code, so long as the contractually-agreed-upon time period is not for less than one year. The buyer and seller may negotiate for a shorter time period to…arrow_forwardWHAT IS THE MEANING OF THE OBJECTIVE THEORY OF CONTRACTS AND HOW DOES THE OBJECTIVE THEORY OF CONTRACTS RELATE TO CONTRACTUAL INTENT?arrow_forward
- In relation to Consideration select the CORRECT statement:Select one:To be valid, the agreed price and the goods sold, must be of equal value.Consideration can be vague or illusory as long as it was communicated to the other partyConsideration is the exchange of something of value (a thing, a promise, money etc), given in return for something else of value (a thing, a promise, money etc)Consideration is not necessary to form a legally binding contractTo be valid, Consideration must involve payment of money, in return for something of value.arrow_forwardAnalyze how each side interprets the meaning of this contract clause. Whose position is more persuasive? Why? In 1947, Congress passed the Portal-to-Portal Act (a “portal is a doorway). This law said that an employer is not liable to pay workers for the time they spend traveling to work (e.g. an hour-long commute). It also excludes from compensable time, “activities which are preliminary to or postliminary to the principle activity or activities that an employee is employed to perform, which occur either prior to the time on any particular workday at which such employee commences, or subsequent to the time on any particular workday at which he ceases, such principle activity or activities.arrow_forwardSamantha signs a contract to buy a brand-new unit in Kogarah. The contract is subject to an extended settlement period of 120 days. Samantha, through her solicitor, transfers the 10% deposit to the vendor’s solicitor and then speaks with her mortgage broker about obtaining a loan. While all this is going on, Samantha sells her own unit in Oatley. She intends to use the money realised from the sale of the Oatley unit to pay the balance of the purchase price of the Kogarah unit. A problem arises when Samantha’s unit does not sell by the expected date. Samantha needed to secure short-term finance at an almost exorbitant interest rate just so she can buy the Kogarah unit. Samantha consults her solicitor, who advises her that she can sue the buyer of her Oatley unit for breach of contract and ask for damages including the additional interest charges she incurred. Is Samantha’s solicitor correct? Explain plsarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios