Why is there a limit placed on the number of iterations when using the waterfall methodology? This raises the question of why things are the way they are.

Why is there a limit on the number of iterations that may be carried out while using the waterfall model?

Why is there a limit on the number of iterations that may be carried out while using the waterfall model?

How does iterative and incremental differ from the waterfall methodology, and vice versa? What's comparable and different?

If you were forced to pick between the waterfall approach and a more cutting-edge methodology, you may choose with the former.Which of these two methods, the current iteratively adaptable waterfall approach, would you pick? Is there anything we can do to make this better?

How come the number of iterations in the waterfall approach is capped? One could then wonder what causes the current state of affairs.

What are the three advantages of incremental development over the waterfall paradigm, as compared to each other?

There are many ways in which the waterfall approach and the iterative and incremental approach are comparable; the issue is how they differ.

Why is there a limit on the number of iterations that may be carried out while using the waterfall model?

Spiral model outperforms waterfall approach in three ways. Compare. Kindly explain your response.