
While completing your audit work for the 30 June 2019 audit of Greenfield Ltd, you become aware of the following material matters:
I. On 5 July, Blue Pty Ltd, a major customer of Greenfield Ltd, was placed into liquidation. As Blue Pty Ltd had confirmed the balance due to Greenfield Ltd as at balance date, management of Greenfield Ltd has refused to write off or provide for the Blue Pty Ltd account in the 30 June 2019 financial report. However, they are prepared to disclose this information as a note to the financial report.
II. On 15 July, Greenfield Ltd entered into a new contract to supply wine to Wine Taster, a major new wine store that had set up operations in northern South Australia. The contract was similar in nature to other contracts previously negotiated with other wine stores. Management does not believe that any change to the financial report is required.
III. Greenfield Ltd has capitalised significant funds incurred in developing an improved new wine cap that allows the wine to continue to develop in the bottle. On 20 July, Greenfield Ltd applied for a patent for the cap, only to discover that a competitor had lodged a similar application on 15 June. The granting of Greenfield Ltd’s patent application is now in serious doubt. Management do not believe any change to the financial report is required.
IV. A note to the financial report of Greenflied Ltd refers to an agreement to sell its major subsidiary, Bursa Valley Pty Ltd, to a rival wine company. This agreement was finalised the day before the financial report was to be signed and the sale is to take place a month after the audit report is to be signed. You have verified this transaction. However, when reviewing the ‘Chairman's Review’, which is to be included in the annual report that contains the audited financial report, you see that:
- a) plans for expanding Bursa Valley Pty Ltd's facilities are outlined.
- b) the additional revenue to be generated over the next ten years as a result of this expansion is tabulated; and
- c) there is no reference to the sale of Bursa Valley Pty Ltd.
Management believe that it is too late to make any changes to the annual report, as it is ready to send to the printers, as soon as the audit report is signed.
Required:
For each independent situation, state the type of audit report that you should issue and givereasons for your answer.

Step by stepSolved in 2 steps

- Solve the following question.arrow_forwardWhile completing your audit work for the 30 June 2022 audit of Bexca Ltd, you become aware of the following material matters: (i) On 5 July, Blue Pty Ltd, a major customer of Bexca Ltd, was placed into liquidation. As Blue Pty Ltd had confirmed the balance due to Bexca Ltd as at balance date, management of Bexca Ltd has refused to write off or provide for the Blue Pty Ltd account in the 30 June 2022 financial report. However, they are prepared to disclose this information as a note to the financial report. (ii) One of Bexca’ major customers, Leisure Pty Ltd, suffered a fire on 20 July. Since Leisure Pty Ltd was uninsured, it is unlikely that their accounts receivable balance will be paid. (iii) On 25 July, a well-known financial planner advised his clients not to invest in Bexca due to poor long-term growth prospects. The market price for Bexca’s shares subsequently declined by 40%. (iv) A note to the financial report of Bexca Ltd refers to an agreement to sell its major subsidiary,…arrow_forwardFor the following independent events, assume that each has a material effect on the financial statements. The financial year of your audit client BLQ Ltd ended on 31 December 2018. Your audit report was signed on 20 February 2019 and the financial statements were issued on 4 March 2019. Listed below are events that have taken place. (a) On 14 February 2019: You discovered that 30% of BLQ Ltd’s inventory is destroyed by a fire on 7 January 2019. (b) On 10 March 2019, you discovered that BLQ Ltd had settled a class action lawsuit for $2 million on 30 January 2019. The class action was initiated by discontent customers in December 2017 for faulty products. The legal cost was disclosed as a provision worth $500,000 on the balance sheet. Required: For each of the events above, explain 1) the auditor’s responsibilities, 2) the appropriate accounting treatments and 3) the impact on audit report.arrow_forward
- You were first appointed auditor of the RST Corporation in 2020. You completed the audit for 2020 and prepared audited financial statements directly from the audit working papers. You have returned to make the 2021 audit and discovered that the client's bookkeeper failed to record the adjusting entries you made in 2020 audit working papers, which entailed adjustments for the following items The December 31, 2020 inventory was understated by P5,000. No entry was made for accrued utilities expense of P2,500 as of year-end. Ordinary motor repairs of P3,200 were charged to Accumulated Depreciation during 2020. The company failed to record the provision for uncollectible accounts in the amount of P6,000. Your examination of the 2021 entries in the accounts uncovered the following: An expenditure of P10,000 for repairs of office equipment had been charged to furniture and Equipment. The company records depreciation at 10% of the December 31 balance of the Property and Equipment accounts.…arrow_forwardYou a partner incharge of the audit for Bargin Ltd, a private company. The completion of the audit report is pending for the income year 2018 and you have recorded some situations where possible action is required They are listed below: Bargin Ltd, carries its property, plant, and equipment accounts at current market values. Current market values exceed historical cost by a highly material amount, and the effects are pervasive throughout the financial statements. Management of Bargin Ltd, refuses to allow you to observe, or make, any counts of inventory. The recorded book value of inventory is highly material. You were unable to confirm accounts receivable with Bargin Ltd, customers. However, because of detailed sales and cash receipts records, you were able to perform reliable alternative audit procedures. One week before the end of fieldwork, you discover that the audit manager on the Bargin Ltd, engagement owns a material amount of Bargin Ltd, common stock. You relied…arrow_forwardSunny Best is the engagement partner for the financial report audit of BigMac Ltd for the year ended 31 December, 2021. The following material events or transactions have come to Sunny Best’s attention before he is scheduled to issue his report on 28 February, On 1 February, 2022, a plant owned by BigMac Ltd was damaged by a flood, resulting in an uninsured loss of inventory. For each of the above events or transactions, discuss audit procedures that should have brought the item to the auditor’s attention, and indicate the treatment required in the financial report. Give reasons for your decision.arrow_forward
- Ann Johnson has audited the financial report of Quick Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2020. Although Ann’s audit fieldwork was completed on 14 August 2020, her auditor’s report was signed on 20 August 2020 and sent to management that day. The management of Quick Ltd advised Ann that their annual report, which will be mailed to shareholders on 10 October 2020, will also include an unaudited financial report for the first quarter ended 30 September 2020. Under the circumstances, Ann is responsible for undertaking subsequent events audit procedures through to:Select one:a. 10 October 2020b. 20 August 2020c. 14 August 2020d. 30 September 2020arrow_forwardUnderCover Ltd sells and supplies security and surveillance equipment and other spyware, and also provides related services. The accountant of UnderCover Ltd is currently preparing its financial reports for the year ended 30 June 2020. The company is a reporting entity. The reports have not been completed as at 11 August 2020. Required: Explain (with reasons) in your own words how and where (including class/category where applicable) each of the events/transactions described below would be treated, recognised and/or disclosed in the financial reports of UnderCover Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2020. Note: You need to consider whether information about the event or transaction needs to be presented separately. Journal entries and actual disclosure notes are not required. On 6 July 2020, the government announced new regulations relating to the sale and use of drones (i.e. unmanned aerial vehicles). Part of the new regulations require that from 1 September 2020, drones can…arrow_forwardDa-Rocha Ltd is a listed manufacturing company which prepares its financial statements for the year ended 31 October, 2018 in accordance with IFRS. The financial statements are due to be authorized for issue on 15 January 2019. i.Da-Rocha Ltd holds an investment in the shares of a listed company, Shelga Ltd. During November 2018 there was a material fall in the value of Shelga Ltd’s shares. Analysts attribute the fall in value principally to a fraud dating back to December 2017 that was discovered by Shelga Ltd's management and announced publicly in November 2018. ii.In December 2018, the directors of Da-Rocha Ltd publicly announced a plan to reduce the workforce by 10% as a result of worsening economic conditions. Required: Discuss the effects of each of the above items on the financial statements of Da-Rocha Ltd for the year ended 31 October 2018 in accordance with IAS 10 Events after the Reporting Periodarrow_forward
- Sorrell, CPA, is auditing the financial statements of Van Dyke as of December 31, 2017. Sorrell’s substantive procedures and other tests indicated that Van Dyke’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and, accordingly, Sorrell expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. Because Van Dyke’s securities are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Van Dyke is subject to the reporting requirements of AS 2201. During its assessment of internal control over financial reporting, Van Dyke’s management identified material weaknesses relatedto (1) the method of accounting for sales commissions and (2) separation of duties related to purchase transactions. Sorrell was able to gather sufficient evidence and did not encounter limitations with respect to the evaluation of Van Dyke’s internal control over financial reporting. Sorrell prepared the following draft report on Van Dyke’s internal control…arrow_forwardYou are a partner incharge of the audit for Bargin Ltd, a private company. The finishing of the audit report is pending for the income year 2018 and you have recorded some situations where possible action is required They are listed below: Bargin Ltd, carries its property, plant, and equipment accounts at current market values. Current market values exceed historical cost by a highly material amount, and the effects are pervasive throughout the financial statements. Management of Bargin Ltd, refuses to allow you to observe, or make, any counts of inventory. The recorded book value of inventory is highly material. You were unable to confirm accounts receivable with Bargin Ltd, customers. However, because of detailed sales and cash receipts records, you were able to perform reliable alternative audit procedures. One week before the end of fieldwork, you discover that the audit manager on the Bargin Ltd, engagement owns a material amount of Bargin Ltd, common stock. You relied…arrow_forwardStuart Mcleay is the senior partner for the financial report audit of Honeybee Toys Australia Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2020. The following material events or transactions have come to Stuart’s attention before he is scheduled to issue his report on 31 August 2020: (a) On 14 July 2020, Honeybee settled and paid a personal injury claim of a former employee as a result of an accident that occurred in March 2019. The company has not previously recorded a liability for the claim. (b) On 17 July 2020, Honeybee agreed to purchase for cash the outstanding shares of baby’s Equipment Ltd. This acquisition is likely to double the sales volume of Honeybee (c) On 20 July 2020, the directors became aware of broken glass found in their pre-packaged sandpits. This product had only been on sale for two weeks and had been purchased directly from the manufacturer, Rockpit Ltd, an unrelated company in Korea, one week prior to being introduced to the public. (d) On 3 August 2020, a plant owned by…arrow_forward
- Auditing: A Risk Based-Approach (MindTap Course L...AccountingISBN:9781337619455Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:Cengage LearningAuditing: A Risk Based-Approach to Conducting a Q...AccountingISBN:9781305080577Author:Karla M Johnstone, Audrey A. Gramling, Larry E. RittenbergPublisher:South-Western College Pub

