Which legal school of thought is illustrated in this dialogue? DONUT DAY AT THE OFFICE Part 4 Lee: Right. Inflexible rules, applied the same way every time and in every situation, are just a sign of corporate insanity. This is a company that knows how to adapt and make smart decisions based on the circumstances at hand. Remember when we found out that Allied Chemical hair gel accelerated hair growth at twice the industry standard . . . just before the hair would fall out? Remember what happened to Winfred after he tested out the stuff for us? Remember how happy Allied Chemical was with us when we figured how to market their goop anyway? The rules are made to help us, the best of the best, get what we want. We are the "enlightened" of the break room, and the rules are meant to help US get what WE want. End Part 4      Irrational forces perspective.   Sociological school of thought.   Legal realism school of thought.   Critical Legal Studies school of thought.

Distinguish between the 3 levels of Strategy and the three stages of Strategic Management. Explain the activities entailed at each of the 3 levels of strategy.

11.2

There are some reason for acquisitions, they are-Increased market power,overcoming entry barriers. cost of new product development and increased speed to market, lower risk compared to developing new products. describes this reason in your own word.

Most corporations exist only under the proper licenses and charter and operate within the limits of safety laws, environmental protection requirements, and other laws and regulations in the government sector. Well-meaning companies sometimes run afoul of stakeholders anyway but can take actions to appease them.  Fina, Inc. established an oil refinery in Port Arthur, Texas. Over the years, subdivisions of attractive ranch-style homes grew up in the shadow of the Fina plant. Home owners became unhappy with the plant in their midst because of its noise and odor. How does Fina have to act in a socially responsible way by helping stakeholders?

In the 1970s, Nestle the Swiss based MNC manufacturer and distributor of food and beverage products, was accused of ‘hooking’ mothers of Africa onto the use of infant formula powdered milk for their babies rather than mothers’ breast milk. Given the powder had to be mixed with water and African water was impure many babies died.   The structure of the Nestle organisation in Africa contained separate product, marketing and sales functions. It was a standalone business entity. So, the sales and product executives in Switzerland were not aware that the infant powdered milk was being ‘mis-sold’ and ‘mis-represented’ leading to dead African babies. Many commentators believed that it was the structure of the African business that was to blame as it had no oversight from Switzerland.   It is fair to say that Nestle made significant and profound changes to its governance structure after this event.    1. Explain what you believe could have been lacking in the Nestle Africa business. Did they…

4. Imagine a market with demand P = 420 – Q in each period. Two firms are thinking about colluding. They each have cost C(Qi) = 60Qi. If they cooperate and behave as a monopoly, then they have a marginal revenue curve, MRm = 420 – 2Q, and a marginal cost curve, MCm = 60. If they are in a cartel, then the firms will split the monopoly production and profits. If they compete, then they face MRi = 420 – 2Qi – Q-I and MCi = 60. a. If the firms stick to their agreement (cooperate), how much per-period profit do they each make? b. If they are not able to maintain their agreement (compete), what is their per-period profit? c. If one firm cheats on their agreement (deviate), how much does each firm make? Be sure to specify both the profit for the cheater and the firm cheated-on. d. Suppose the firms assume that their interaction will last forever (r = 1) and they share the common discount value R. What is the lowest value of R such that both firms are willing to continue with the cartel…

Handwritten asap plzzzzzz...solve 20 mins..i"ll give you more votes

5.4 Food service firms buy meat, vegetables, and other foods and resell them to restaurants, schools, and hospitals. US Foods and Sysco are by far the largest firms in the indus- try. In 2015, these firms were attempting to combine or merge to form a single firm. A news story quoted one res- taurant owner as saying: "There was definite panic in the restaurant industry... when the merger was announced. They know they're going to get squeezed." a. Analyze the effect on the food service market of US Foods and Sysco combining. Draw a graph to illustrate your answer. For simplicity, assume that the market was perfectly competitive before the firms combined and would be a monopoly afterward. Be sure your graph shows changes in the equilibrium price, the equilibrium quantity, consumer surplus, producer surplus, and deadweight loss. b. Why would restaurant owners believe they would be "squeezed" by this development?

Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.