Which two of the many compelling arguments in support of layered protocols immediately spring to mind? You must present concrete evidence to support your allegation.

There are two main arguments in favor of using layered protocols. Provide evidence to support your claims.

A web client is required to first make use of the web server's native authentication and authorization services before they are allowed access to a web server's protected resources. Is there any additional benefit to using layered protocols except those listed here? It would be helpful if you could provide concrete examples to back up your claims.

Design a cryptographic solution for implementing the dinning cryptographers protocol.  You should consider the following: The secret messages shared between any two agents in the protocol are communicated over public channels only. The announcements made by each agent must be traceable in a trustworthy way to that agent.   Your solution should be a new protocol that addresses the above two requirements.

Demonstrate the step-by-step implementation of native authentication and authorization services when a web client seeks access to protected resources on a web server. What are the two most compelling reasons to use layered protocols? Give instances to support your point.

There has to be a breakdown of the five most common network topologies. Which one do you find more plausible, in light of what you know and believe?