Which statement accurately summarizes why radiocarbon dating could be used for some samples but not others? A. Carbon's half-life is much longer than that of potassium or uranium, so radiocarbon dating can only be used for materials up to about 70,000 years old. B. Carbon's half-life is much longer than that of potassium or uranium, so radiocarbon dating can only be used for materials at least a million years old. C. Carbon's half-life is much shorter than that of potassium or uranium, so radiocarbon dating can only be used for materials at least a million years old. D. Carbon's half-life is much shorter than that of potassium or uranium, so radiocarbon dating can only be used for materials up to about 70,000 years old.
Which statement accurately summarizes why radiocarbon dating could be used for some samples but not others?
A. Carbon's half-life is much longer than that of potassium or uranium, so radiocarbon dating can only be used for materials up to about 70,000 years old.
B. Carbon's half-life is much longer than that of potassium or uranium, so radiocarbon dating can only be used for materials at least a million years old.
C. Carbon's half-life is much shorter than that of potassium or uranium, so radiocarbon dating can only be used for materials at least a million years old.
D. Carbon's half-life is much shorter than that of potassium or uranium, so radiocarbon dating can only be used for materials up to about 70,000 years old.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
