Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by stepSolved in 2 steps
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The diameter of the Sun is 865,380 miles across while Saturn's diameter is 72,368 miles across. The Sun is _____times bigger than Saturn (give whole number as your answer!). If we could shrink Saturn down to a size of a cherry (diameter is 1 inch across), then Sun would be as big as ______. Use one of the following objects as your answer. Watermelon (average size is 12 inches across) Basketball (average size is 9.5 inches across) Average Halloween pumpkin (average size is 15 inches across) Pumpkin at the Puyallup fair (average size is 40 inches across)arrow_forwardF2 Planets in the habitable zone of their stars: 1 #3 3 O are so far from their stars that it is very difficult to discover them O are at a temperature where water can exist as a liquid on the planet's surface O are always the planets closest to the star are also called hot Jupiters O cannot exist around stars that are red dwarfs (spectral type M) E G D F3 $ 54 2 4 R F4 LL F DII % 5 Q Search F5 T 9 -0. G < 6 A F6 Y * F7 & 7 H PrtScn U FB 8 Home Jarrow_forwardFor which of the following reasons (select all that apply), is it useful/important to send rovers to other planetary bodies in our solar system? O a. The engineering innovations developed to produce successful/viable rovers and landers on other planets can help lead to developments in the technology used here on Earth that may have taken far more time to develop without the limitations provided by space travel to foreign worlds. O b. The data collected can help improve our understanding of the evolution/development of our solar system. O. Rovers/landers can be outfitted with various tools and equipment that can be used to inform of us of the geological histories of each of the planets they visit. O d. More direct probes of the planetary surface are possible to detect signs of the building blocks of life. O e. Rock samples can be used to calibrate our estimations of the age of the solar system.arrow_forward
- Imagine that in the future, scientists plan on colonizing planets that orbit other stars. Based on your knowledge of the life cycle of stars, decide which type of star (High mass or Low mass) the planet should orbit that would allow for human life to safely live on that planet for the longest period of time. Explain your answer using examples from the life cycle of each star.arrow_forward1) How massive would Earth had been if it had accreted hydrogen compounds in addition to the sme properties listed in table 7.1? (Assume the same properties of the ingredients as listed in the table) 2) Now imagine that Earth had been able to capture hydrogen and helium gas in the same proportions as listed in the table. How massive would it have been?arrow_forwardToday, the largest radio telescope in the world is located in Puerto Rico Russia China Australia To be considered habitable, a planet must have an alien civilization living on it the right temperature for liquid water on the surface the right conditions for human explorers to be able to survive a very large iron corearrow_forward
- What is an exoplanet? Group of answer choices A planet in our solar system beyond Pluto. Any planet with extra-terrestrial life. A planet in an extra-solar star system outside of our solar system. Objects in the solar system such as Pluto that were once considered planets but no longer are.arrow_forwardINVEST IGATION 3 1. Fill out this data table with information you have collected (from Handout B: Pluto) about the dwarf planet Pluto. Characteristics Unit Pluto Mass 1024 g 14.6 Volume 1024 Cm3 7 Density g/cm3 2.08 5,900.4 Distance from Sun 106 km 1,185 Radius km Crust Thickness km unknown Atmosphere Height km 60 km Axial Tilt degrees 122.5 Force of Gravity on a 1 kg test mass Length of Day hoursarrow_forwardHow would the solar system be different if the solar nebula had cooled, with a temperature half its actual value? [select all that apply] options: There would be more comets. Life would have been very unlikely to evolve here. There would be no comets. There would be fewer asteroids. There would be more asteroids. Jovian planets would have formed closer to Sun. Terrestrial planets would be largearrow_forward
- If there was a planet orbiting a first generation star, which planet in our solar system would it resemble most? Would it be likely for such a planet to have life?arrow_forward2. The destructive "Tunguska Event" of 1908 seems to have been due to an airburst by a modest-sized asteroid a direct impact on land by a large asteroid an ocean impact by a comet a nearby supernova explosion Astronomers have determined that the probability of a significant asteroid impact on Earth during your lifetime is about the same as the probabilty that you'll win the lottery. True Falsearrow_forwardThe microlensing technique for detecting extrasolar planets involves obtaining OBSERVING brightness measurements of a star and identifying brief, periodic dips in its brightness infrared images of a planet with the light from its host star blocked out a spectrum of a star and identifying periodic wavelength shifts in its features brightness measurements of a star and identifying a brief magnification in its brightness a spectrum of an extrasolar planet and identifying elements and compounds present in its atmospherearrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios