When it comes to the design of an efficient network, a number of important factors, including cost, time, scalability, and sustainability, are taken into consideration. How can a network that has been thoughtfully constructed have a positive influence on the quality of our social life as well as the environment?

If these three conditions are not met, how is it possible for a network to succeed and maximize its potential? Please describe your decision in as few words and in your own words as you can.

Consider the relevance of wireless networks in nations where development is still under progress.Local area networks (LANs) and cables have been largely replaced by wireless technology in a variety of scenarios.Exists the possibility for anything positive or negative to result from this?

So, what are the three conditions under which a network may be considered successful and efficient? Please, if you don't mind, provide a quick definition of what it is.So, what are the three conditions under which a network may be considered successful and efficient? Please, if you don't mind, provide a quick definition of what it is.

Think about how important wireless networks are in the nations of the globe that are still growing at the moment. In a wide variety of contexts, cable and traditional local area networks (LANs) have been rendered obsolete by wireless technology, which has effectively taken their place. Is there going to be a positive outcome as a result of this action, or are there going to be any adverse effects as a direct consequence of taking this course of action?

How can a network possibly be efficient and productive if three conditions aren't met? Provide a succinct explanation, using your own words, as to which option you ultimately chose.