Related questions
Question
What is your view on this scenario "Ms. Lesly, a diplomat from the a state reffered to as SS, who is accused of committinh a crimina offense by mudering a national of the RS as a self defense. The circumstances leading to the killing of the RS national were not spelled out. Based on the facts provided by SS, the RS is not a signatory of VCDR. As a result Ms. Lesly was tried based on the national law of RS.
SAVE
AI-Generated Solution
info
AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.
Unlock instant AI solutions
Tap the button
to generate a solution
to generate a solution
Click the button to generate
a solution
a solution
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Leon A. Tashof operated a store known as the New York Jewelry Company. The store was located in an area that served low-income consumers, many of whom had low-paying jobs and had no bank or charge accounts. About 85 percent of the store’s sales were made on credit. The store advertised eyeglasses “from $7.50 complete,” including “lenses, frames and case.” Tashof advertised this sale extensively on radio and in newspapers. Evidence showed that of the 1,400 pairs of eyeglasses sold by the store, fewer than 10 were sold for $7.50; the rest were more expensive glasses. The Federal Trade Commission sued Tashof for engaging in bait-and-switch marketing, in violation of Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. a) Explain what a bait and switch is. b) Was Tashof’s conduct in this case ethical? c) Who wins, and why?arrow_forwardAssume Illinois passes a law requiring doctors to be certified before providing medical services to citizens of Illinois. You represent a client who is licensed to practice medicine in Indiana. Your client recently administered a drug to a patient in an emergency room of an Illinois hospital located right across the border of Indiana and Illinois. She is fined $50,000 and refuses to pay. What constitutional arguments can you make on your client’s behalf as to why this law is unconstitutional as applied to her.arrow_forwardDetermine the buyer’s and seller’s responsibility in a commercial transaction. Unvergleichbar Gesellschaft AG, based in Bremen, Germany buys raw diamonds from Diamants Stornoway based in Longueuil, QC, under the following terms: Terms of sale: DPU Flughafen Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland, Incoterms 2020: a)On his way to Europe, over the Atlantic Ocean, the airplane disappears from the radar and never arrives in Germany. Who bears the risk?arrow_forward
- Sungsam, Inc., a Taiwanese company, and nineteen other Asian companies (the Companies) collaborated to manufacture and sell transistors internationally. These transistors were used in a multitude of consumer goods, millions of which were sold in the United States, including Georgia. The state of Georgia sued the Companies in Georgia, alleging violating consumer protection laws. The Companies filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. In response, Plaintiff alleged that the Companies sold the transistors into international streams of commerce with the intent that they would be incorporated into millions of consumer products sold in the United States, including Georgia. Should the Companies motion be granted? © a. No because the Companies did not sell any products directly to Georgia consumers and did not conduct any business in Georgia. b. Yes because a foreign manufacturer’s placement of goods into the stream of commerce of the state of Georgia, with…arrow_forwardPurell Magazine Construction Fraud The Purell Magazine Construction Fraud case involves James Small, a facilities supervisor at Purell Magazine and Publishing House, who engaged in a sophisticated scheme of occupational fraud. Small was responsible for overseeing the painting operations as part of the company's conversion of its plant in Oakville, Ontario, into an office complex. This massive renovation project involved constructing an auditorium identical to one in the company's European offices. Small's fraudulent activities came to light when the vice president of administrative services, Richard Green, noticed forgeries in a stack of invoices related to the auditorium construction project. An initial investigation revealed that all the forgeries were in the painting division, with a budget of approximately $800,000 a year. Small, who earned about $30,000 a year, had been the only person overseeing the painting operations. Small's fraud scheme involved creating false invoices for…arrow_forwardIn partnership with American Express, Porter Cable requests that all employees at the rank of supervisor and above apply for a corporate credit card to be used for pay for travel, training and similar expenses. Ima Krimnel, the manager of the distribution center, was issued a corporate card and used it to take her husband to Hawaii for their 20th wedding anniversary. If Krimnel does not pay the charges, is Porter Cable liable? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Doing Business Internationally. Macrotech, Inc.,develops an innovative computer chip and obtains a patent onit. The firm markets the chip under the trademarked brandname “Flash.” Macrotech wants to sell the chip to Nitron,Ltd., in Pacifica, a foreign country. Macrotech is concerned,however, that after an initial purchase, Nitron will duplicate the chip, pirate it, and sell the pirated version to computermanufacturers in Pacifica. To avoid this possibility, Macrotech could establish its own manufacturing facility in Pacifica, but it does not want to do this. How can Macrotech,without establishing a manufacturing facility in Pacifica, protect Flash from being pirated by Nitron? (See Doing BusinessInternationally.)arrow_forwardPost to “The California “Home Protection Bill of Rights” presumes that a person using deadly force on an intruder acted in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or a member of the household. Do you agree or disagree with such a presumption? Does the castle doctrine encourage gun ownership?”arrow_forwardProvide a response to this The commitment of the UN to human rights was made clear in the Preamble to the Charter which reaffirms faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women irrespective of race, sex, language or religion.' Article 1(1) of the Charter calls the maintenance of world peace and security. As we speak, Israel is on a mission to destroy all civilian infrastructure (hospitals, school, mosques, cultural centers), killing indiscriminatory men, women and children and media, medical and other humanitarian personnel. With all the resolutions adopted by the UN and the ruling from the IJC, the situation in Palestine continues to deteriorate. I am interested to know what fuel the double standard applied by the international community between Palestine and Ukraine. Currently, there are 193 member states to the UN Charter. What is shocking is that powerful states such as the USA and its allies are not…arrow_forward
- Immigration law has become increasingly important in recent years, and it is estimated there are over 14 million undocumented immigrants today in the United States. Many come to the United States in hopes of finding work. The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) makes it illegal to hire, recruit, or refer for a fee someone not authorized to work legally in the United States. When it comes to hiring new employees, explain the requirements for employers today to comply with IRCA and the penalties for violating the law.arrow_forwardVozzello is on a domestic flight heading from Seattle to Baltimore when he experiences a medical emergency. Thankfully, Doctor Amalia is also on the plane and is able to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation ("CPR") to keep him stabilized until they land, at which point he is taken to a local hospital for further treatment. Two weeks later, Vozzello is shocked when he receives a $37.000 bill from Amalia for the services she provided. Amalia argues that $37,000 is reasonable because she is a nationally renowned cardiovascular specialist who graduated from one of the top medical schools in the world. Which of the following statements is correct? Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-fact contract was formed. He is therefore required by law to pay her typical rate, and $37.000 is justified considering her qualifications. Since Vozzello benefitted from Amalia's services, an implied-in-law contract was formed. He is therefore required by law to pay her typical…arrow_forwardA visiting American executive finds that a foreign subsidiary in a poor nation has hired a 12-year-old girl to work on a factory floor, in violation of the company's prohibition on child labor. He tells the local manager to replace the child and tell her to go back to school. The local manager tells the American executive that the child is an orphan with no other means of support, and she will probably become a street child if she is denied work. What ethical issue is evident in this case? ...........arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios