What is the running time of the following algorithm. f(n){ for(int j = 1; j<=7;j++) f(n/7): for(int i = 2; i*i <= n; ++i{ print(); Write down the answer without using the asymptotic notations; for example if the answer is e(n) you just have to write n. Please use these symbols: Square root: sqrt(n) Factorial n: n! logarithm n: log(n) Exponential n: c^n Answer:

What is the running time of the following algorithm. f(n){ for(int j = 1; j<=7;j++) f(n/7): for(int i = 2; i*i <= n; ++i{ print(); Write down the answer without using the asymptotic notations; for example if the answer is e(n) you just have to write n. Please use these symbols: Square root: sqrt(n) Factorial n: n! logarithm n: log(n) Exponential n: c^n Answer:

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

hello guys. can you solve it? thank you...
The factorial of a positive integer n —which we denote as n!—is the product of n and the factorial of n 1. The factorial of 0 is 1. Write two different recursive methods in Java that each return the factorial of n. Analyze your algorithm in Big-Oh notation and provide the appropriate analysis, ensuring that your program has a test class.
Trace the following code and write what it does. void Finals(X, Y, m, n) { int i=1, j-1, k=13; while (i <=m && j<=n) { if (X[i]
Find the values of n and m to solve this puzzle int n = ? int m = ? int t = 76; int s = 0; char *msg = "Do you like spaghetti? Try some spaghetti! It's good, right?\n" "What, you prefer structured loops? How mundane.\n"; goto LTOP; LEND: failure(msg); LOM1: n = (n<<2) - n + 1; LCHK: if(s == t && m == t){ goto LAFT; } s++; goto LTOP; LOC1: if(n & 1){ goto LOM1; } goto LEM1; LTOP: if(!(n>1)){ goto LEND; } goto LOC1; LEM1: n = n >> 1; goto LCHK; LAFT: return;
def hailstone(n): h.append(int(n)) if n == 1: return h while n != 1: if n % 2 == 0: return hailstone(int(n/2)) else: return hailstone(int(3*n + 1))y=int(input("N: "))if y <= 0: print("N must be positive!")else: print("Hailstone sequences for 1 to " + str(y) + ":") m=0; i=1 for x in range(1, y+1): n = i h = [] h = hailstone(n) print(h) s=len(h) if s > m: m=s flag=n i=i+1 print("First longest sequence found in n =", + flag ) If i don't one the output have the square braket? How can I fix this code? Can you pleasw help me?
Please solve Quickly С++
def hailstone(n): h.append(int(n)) if n == 1: return h while n != 1: if n % 2 == 0: return hailstone(int(n/2)) else: return hailstone(int(3*n + 1))y=int(input("N: "))if y <= 0: print("N must be positive!")else: print("Hailstone sequences for 1 to " + str(y) + ": ") m=0; i=1 for x in range(1, y+1): n = i h = [] h = hailstone(n) print(*h) print(",") s=len(h) if s > m: m=s flag=n i=i+1 print("First longest sequence found in n =", + flag ) How can I fix this code if I want a comma between each number, not each line?
No plagarism please! Correct and detailed answer will be Upvoted else downvoted. Thank you!
Code Must be in Python. I will upvote you.
#include int main(void) { int a[3][3] = {1,3,5,7,9}; int i,j,sum=0; for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) for (j = 0; j < 3; j++) sum += a[i-i][j-j]; %3D printf("%d\n",sum); return 0; }
JAVA: Which is/are correct statement(s) about the Recursion? (Select all that apply) We can use for loop and while loop in recursion. We solve a problem that depends on solving smaller occurrences of the same problem. We have high performance while using recursion rather than iteration. We have high performance while using iteration rather than recursion. Easy to implement the algorithm while using recursion but hard to find the time complexity. Easy to implement the algorithm while using iteration but hard to find the time complexity. Base case is a simple occurrence that cannot be answered directly. Recursive case is a more complex occurrence of the problem that cannot be directly answered, but can instead be described in terms of smaller occurrences of the same problem. We must have exact one base case and one recursive case. We must have at least one base case. We must have at least one recursive case.