What exactly is the point of having the LDAP standard if it can be implemented easily on top of an existing database system?

Take, for example, a snapshot-isolated database management system like the one employed by an airline. I was wondering if you could provide me an example of a non-serializable execution that the airline is willing to endure in exchange for greater speed.

The problems with concurrency control in distributed database management systems are similar to those in other types of distributed systems. Do we need to use two-phase locking (2PL) or some other kind of concurrency management when we have a unique setup? Explain.

What is dynamic scoping, when is it utilized, and how can it be made to perform better?

How do concepts like ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) and BASE (Basically Available, Soft state, Eventually consistent) differ in their application to database environments, especially in distributed systems?

Try out various data-request situations in a real-world distributed database.

Imagine a database management system, such as the one used by an airline, that makes use of snapshot isolation. For instance, in order to get more favorable results over the long run, the airline can decide to go with a non serializable execution.