We respectfully request that you limit your comments to no more than three or four at most. What exactly does it mean to adopt a human rights-focused approach to science, technology, and development?

Trevor Noah asked the identical question on how to protest three times; why do you think that was? Is Lahren's response satisfactory to you? Please elaborate on your solution.

It is highly recommended that individuals engage in discussions regarding the utilisation of digital evidence in criminal and civil court proceedings. It is advisable to initiate these discussions at the earliest convenience.

We humbly suggest that you restrict your comments to no more than three or four. In what ways should human rights be prioritised in development, science, and technology policy?

What is the risk of considering human rights as purely cosmetic moral aspects of scientific and technical progress?

Please limit your comments to three or four. What does human rights-centered development, science, and technology policy imply?

What are the consequences of seeing human rights as just superficial moral components of scientific and technological development?

try to reason out or give your own opinion by choosing just three (3) from the four (4) questions below:  What do you think? / In your own opinion…….   Should a computer virus distribution sentence carry the same penalty as manslaughter?   Should it be a crime to steal a copy of computer data while leaving the original data in place and unaltered?   Should hackers be sent to jail if they cannot pay restitution to companies and individuals who lost money as the result of a prank?   Do you think that a hacker would make a good computer-security consultant?

What are the potential repercussions if human rights are only flimsy moral underpinnings of developing scientific and technical capabilities?

What are the repercussions of human rights being just moral components of expanding scientific and technical capabilities?