We are utilising a substandard hash map in which all values are stored in a single container (i.e., they are all in the same LinkedList). The purpose of a hash map has been accomplished satisfactorily.

Since our hash map was poorly constructed, all of the information is stored in a single container (a LinkedList). This completely negates any positive effects of using a hash map.

We have a poor hash map because all values were placed into one container (i.e., they are all in the same LinkedList). Explain how this defeats hash maps if it does.

We have a hash map that wasn't made very well since all the values were dumped into the same bucket (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). Explain why employing a hash map in the first place would be defeated by this, if that is the case.

A substandard hash map contains each value in a single container, or LinkedList. Hash maps are functional.

Our hash map wasn't correctly formed since all the data were in one bucket (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). Explain why this would defeat the purpose of a hash map.

We're dealing with a bad hash map in which all of the values are stored in the same container (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). The purpose of a hash map has been completed.

We have a crude hash map where all values are concatenated into a single bucket (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). A hash map's goal has been accomplished.

Open hashing and closed hashing are two different types of hashing (overflowchaining)Hashing using a closed loop

The data that makes up our hash map is all kept in a single LinkedList container due to the way the map was designed. This significantly reduces a hash map's efficiency.   The data that makes up our hash map is all kept in a single LinkedList container due to the way the map was designed. This significantly reduces a hash map's efficiency.