Variables Mean SD Honesty Profanity self report Profanity used Honesty 7.63 3.00 (0.79) Profanity self report 6.51 2.56 0.34*** (0.84) Profanity used 4.09 2.61 0.20** 0.46*** (-) Profanity liked 1.60 1.62 0.13** 0.41*** 0.45*** * p < .05. ** p < .01 *** p < .001. Based on the results of this table, is there evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between using profanity, as assessed by any of the three profanity measures, and honesty? a. Yes, because all 3 correlations between honesty and the measures of profanity have asteriks that indicate p values less than (at least) 0.05. b. Yes, because all 3 correlations between honesty and the measures of profanity are greater than 0.10. c. No, because none of the p values associated with the correlations between honesty and the measures of profanity is less than the typical alpha level of 0.05. d. No, because none of the p values associated with correlations between honesty and the measures of profanity is larger than 0.50, what Cohen defines as a large effect.
Variables Mean SD Honesty Profanity self report Profanity used
Honesty 7.63 3.00 (0.79)
Profanity self report 6.51 2.56 0.34*** (0.84)
Profanity used 4.09 2.61 0.20** 0.46*** (-)
Profanity liked 1.60 1.62 0.13** 0.41*** 0.45***
* p < .05. ** p < .01 *** p < .001.
Based on the results of this table, is there evidence to reject the null hypothesis that there is no correlation between using profanity, as assessed by any of the three profanity measures, and honesty?
a. Yes, because all 3
b. Yes, because all 3 correlations between honesty and the measures of profanity are greater than 0.10.
c. No, because none of the p values associated with the correlations between honesty and the measures of profanity is less than the typical alpha level of 0.05.
d. No, because none of the p values associated with correlations between honesty and the measures of profanity is larger than 0.50, what Cohen defines as a large effect.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
