Using Temple Grandin's reading "An inside view of Autism" and Silberman Neurotribes reading " In Autistic Space". Please respond to the following questions in complete sentences.What is the (or a) main point of each of the materials?What are at least two pieces of evidence/data they use to support this?How do the two materials speak to each other? For example, do they to support one another in some way? Does one focus on a different aspect of an issue presented in the other? Do they contradict each other? Does one get us to consider an important aspect of an issue that is not considered in the other?What were your reactions to these materials? For example, did anything surprise you? Did you find yourself disagreeing, or agreeing, with what you were reading? Were there issues you wanted to learn more about?

Temple Grandin's "An Inside View of Autism"Main Point: The primary goal of Temple Grandin's "An inside View of Autism" is to present autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from the inside out. Grandin, who has autism herself, discusses her personal experiences and perspectives on the difficulties and advantages of having autism.Evidence/Data: Grandin uses a variety of evidence to support her claims, including research results, anecdotes from other autistic individuals, and her own firsthand experiences. She discusses, for example, how she struggled with sensory sensitivity and how her peers avoided her when she was younger. She also discusses the challenges she had in her career and in her education.Relationship to "NeuroTribes"Grandin's paper improves Steve Silberman's book "NeuroTribes" in a number of ways. Both pieces challenge the traditional view of autism as a deficit condition while showcasing the skills and accomplishments of people with autism. Grandin's autobiographical narrative offers a personal and subjective perspective on autism, while Silberman's research provides a more thorough historical and cultural context.Reactions:Surprise:It surprised me to learn how extreme Grandin's sensory sensitivity was. She discusses how some objects and sounds can cause bodily harm to her.Agreement:I agree with Grandin's assertion that autistic people have unique strengths and abilities that can be valuable to society.Further Learning:I'm interested in learning more about the several ways autism can manifest.Steve Silberman's "NeuroTribes"Main Point:The book "NeuroTribes" by Steve Silberman challenges the traditional view of autism as a deficient illness, proposing instead that it is a natural and advantageous feature of human variety. Examining the history of autism, Silberman argues that the rise of the medical model of autism is to blame for the pathologizing of autistic people.Evidence/Data:Silberman backs up his assertions with a wide range of facts, such as historical records, empirical studies, and conversations with individuals who have autism and their families. He also talks about the contributions made by trailblazing scientists and activists who have contested the mainstream understanding of autism.Relationship to "An Inside View of Autism"Silberman's book improves Grandin's article in several ways. Both instances challenge the medical concept of autism while showcasing the abilities and achievements of people with autism. Grandin's article offers a more subjective and personal perspective on autism, whereas Silberman's book provides a more thorough historical and cultural context.Reactions:Surprise:I was astounded to learn about the early history of autism and how it has been seen and handled throughout time.Agreement:I think that autism is a normal and desirable element of human variability, and Silberman makes a good point in saying so.Further Learning:I am interested in learning more about the neurobiology of autism and how it affects the way autistic people think and experience the world.In conclusion, "An Inside View of Autism" by Temple Grandin and "NeuroTribes" by Steve Silberman both help to change the way that we think about autism.Grandin's autobiographical account offers a close-up view of the difficulties and advantages of having autism, while Silberman's historical critique refutes the medical paradigm and emphasises autism as a normal and valuable facet of human variation. Collectively, they highlight how important it is to recognise and value the distinctive viewpoints and contributions made by people with autism, promoting a more accepting and understanding community.

Answered: Using Temple Grandin's reading "An…

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)

5th Edition

ISBN:9780134477961

Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White

Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White

Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1TY

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Using Temple Grandin's reading "An inside view of Autism" and Silberman Neurotribes reading " In Autistic Space". Please respond to the following questions in complete sentences.

What is the (or a) main point of each of the materials?
What are at least two pieces of evidence/data they use to support this?
How do the two materials speak to each other? For example, do they to support one another in some way? Does one focus on a different aspect of an issue presented in the other? Do they contradict each other? Does one get us to consider an important aspect of an issue that is not considered in the other?
What were your reactions to these materials? For example, did anything surprise you? Did you find yourself disagreeing, or agreeing, with what you were reading? Were there issues you wanted to learn more about?

Expert Solution