Using (incremental) benefit-cost ratio analysis OR (incremental) internal rate of return, letermine which of the following three mutually exclusive alternatives should be selected. Each lternative has a 6-year useful life. Assume the MARR is 6%. First Cost Uniform Annual Benefit Salvage Value $560 $140 $40 A $340 $100 0 B $125 $40 0 C

Using (incremental) benefit-cost ratio analysis OR (incremental) internal rate of return, letermine which of the following three mutually exclusive alternatives should be selected. Each lternative has a 6-year useful life. Assume the MARR is 6%. First Cost Uniform Annual Benefit Salvage Value $560 $140 $40 A $340 $100 0 B $125 $40 0 C

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2- According to mutually exclusive (ME) alternatives, you have been asked to select the better alternative between two projects at 8% per year. Project A Project B First cost, $ -10000 -14000 Annual cost, $ per year -300 -200 Salvage value, $ Estimated life, years 4000 2000 2 a. Do the evaluation based on Future worth (FW) method b. Do the evaluation based on Annual worth (AW) method. c. Redo the evaluation again based on Capitalized Cost (CC) method. (Tip: use the results from part b) d. If only project B run forever. Redo the evaluation again based on Capitalized Cost (CC) method. (Tip: use the results from part b)
Third Question: An investment of 4000$ and estimated salvage value of 3000$, and the following incomes & outcomes: 4000 200 4000 S₁ 2500 Knowing that MARR is equal to (15%) According to the External rate of return (ERR) method, evaluate this investment. Grade 5 3000 8
Given the following project alternatives, determine the most economical investment given an MARR of 10% using IRR method. Project A B C D 6.12% -2.8067% -3.394% 2699% Investment 13.69% $ 100,000 $ Annual Profit Useful Life Salvage Value $ 140,500 $ 148,200 $ 27,500 38,600 38,500 $ 98,000 $ 22,100 What is the incremental IRR of the second comparison? 5 5 5 5 $ 10,000 $ $ 14,000 25,600 14,000
Use Annual Cost Analysis to determine whether Alternative A or B should be chosen. The analysis period is 5 years. Assume an interest rate of 6% per year, compounded annually Alternative A Alternative B 1800 150 400 5 Initial Cost Annual Benefit Salvage Value Useful Life (yrs) 4230 340 2100 O Alternative B should be chosen, because its annual benefit is higher than Alternative A's Alternative A should be chosen, because its initial cost is lower than Alternative B's O Alternative B should be chosen, because its equivalent annual cost is $85.30 higher than Alternative A's Alternative A should be chosen, because its equivalent annual cost is $85.30 lower than Alternative B's
Consider the following 2 alternatives. Alternative A Initial cost: $10,000 Mainteinance anual $6000 Useful life 2 years Residual Value $1000 Alternative B Initial cost $ 12,000 Maintenance annual $ 5000 Useful life 4 years Residual value $ 3000 MARR for both is 8% a) The equivalent Uniform Annual Value for alternative A is $ and the equivalent Uniform Annual Value for alternative B is $
I need typing clear urjent no chatgpt use i will give 5 upvotes
Calculate the conventional benefit-cost ratio for the alternative: Initial Investment 150000 Revenues 50000 Costs 20000 Salvage Value 50000 Useful life 10 MARR 0.1 Select one: a. 1.2114 b. 1.3130 c. 1.4659 d. 1.3681 e. 1.2960
At what interest rate the 5-year Benefit-Cost-Ratio (BCR) becomes unity for an equipment project with the immediate installation cost of -$2500 (in year 0) and a maintenance cost of -$1500 in year 3, and annual benefit of $1000 from the first year onward (n=1 to 5)? Select one: O A. 12.5% O B. 11.5% OC. 14.5% O D. 13.5% O E. 5%
Consider three mutually exclusive alternatives, each with a 15-year useful life. If the MARR is 12%, which alternative should be selected? Solve the problem by benefit–cost ratio analysis.
A cost analysis is to be made to determine what, if anything, should be done in a situation offering three "do-something" and one "do-nothing" alternatives. Estimates of the costs and benefits are as follows: End-of- Uniform Useful- Life Benefit Salvage (years) Value Useful First Alternatives Cost Annual Life -$500 $135 -600 100 250 5 -700 100 180 10 4 Use Present Worth Analysis with the Least Common Multiple Method to select the best alternative. Use MARR=6%. (Note: You MUST describe your answers with conversion factor notations and you DON'T NEED TO calculate the values of PW for supporting a decision. Simply describe your selection criterion with PW expressions.) 1.
The following information is for five mutually exclusive alternatives that have 20-year useful lives. The decision maker may choose any one of the options or reject them all. Prepare a choice table.
An engineering analysis by net present worth (NPW) is to be made for the purchase of two devices, A and B. If an 8% interest rate is used, recommend the device to be purchased.