Use your own words to describe how the OSI model and the TCP/IP model vary from one another. How did you come to believe there were two distinct models?

Answer the given question with a proper explanation and step-by-step solution.  Why is TCP/IP fragmentation important for internet communications? What would likely happen on the internet without that fragmentation? Why is TCP considered a "reliable" communication protocol but HTTP and Ethernet considered "not reliable"? Is there some "better way" to arrange internet communications?

The four TCP/IP abstraction layers have me baffled.

What makes TCP different from UDP in terms of these three features?

How do these three features of TCP vary from those of UDP?

Specifically, how are TCP and UDP different from one another, and what do they accomplish? There are essentially four distinct ways in which these procedures diverge from one another.

Give a brief review of the pros and cons of using connectionless protocols instead of connection-based ones.

Explain the difference between the OSI model and the TCP/IP model using your own words. What gives you the idea that there are two different models?

There is a potential that the OSI model and the TCP/IP model will be able to help us understand and communicate information about connections and information transfers (the internet).Do any of these models strike you as being even somewhat familiar?

Create a pros and cons list for TCP.