Database System Concepts
Database System Concepts
7th Edition
ISBN: 9780078022159
Author: Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher: McGraw-Hill Education
Bartleby Related Questions Icon

Related questions

Question

Use De Morgan's law for quantified statements and the laws of propositional logic to show the following equivalences:

**Transcription for Educational Website:**

**Logical Equivalence in Predicate Logic**

In the study of logic, particularly predicate logic, we often deal with statements involving quantifiers and logical connectives. Below is an expression demonstrating logical equivalence:

(b) \( \neg \forall x (\neg P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) \equiv \exists x (\neg P(x) \land \neg Q(x)) \)

**Explanation:**

This expression is a logical equivalence that shows the transformation between two statements:

- The left side, \( \neg \forall x (\neg P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) \), represents the negation of a universal quantification. It reads as "It is not true that for all \( x \), if \( P(x) \) is false, then \( Q(x) \) is true."

- The right side, \( \exists x (\neg P(x) \land \neg Q(x)) \), represents an existential quantification. It reads as "There exists an \( x \) such that \( P(x) \) is false and \( Q(x) \) is false."

The equivalence illustrates how negating a universal statement can be converted into an existential statement with different conditions. This concept is fundamental in simplifying and transforming logical expressions within proofs and logical reasoning.
expand button
Transcribed Image Text:**Transcription for Educational Website:** **Logical Equivalence in Predicate Logic** In the study of logic, particularly predicate logic, we often deal with statements involving quantifiers and logical connectives. Below is an expression demonstrating logical equivalence: (b) \( \neg \forall x (\neg P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) \equiv \exists x (\neg P(x) \land \neg Q(x)) \) **Explanation:** This expression is a logical equivalence that shows the transformation between two statements: - The left side, \( \neg \forall x (\neg P(x) \rightarrow Q(x)) \), represents the negation of a universal quantification. It reads as "It is not true that for all \( x \), if \( P(x) \) is false, then \( Q(x) \) is true." - The right side, \( \exists x (\neg P(x) \land \neg Q(x)) \), represents an existential quantification. It reads as "There exists an \( x \) such that \( P(x) \) is false and \( Q(x) \) is false." The equivalence illustrates how negating a universal statement can be converted into an existential statement with different conditions. This concept is fundamental in simplifying and transforming logical expressions within proofs and logical reasoning.
Expert Solution
Check Mark
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Database System Concepts
Computer Science
ISBN:9780078022159
Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education
Text book image
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780134444321
Author:Tony Gaddis
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780132737968
Author:Thomas L. Floyd
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
C How to Program (8th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:9780133976892
Author:Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag...
Computer Science
ISBN:9781337627900
Author:Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Programmable Logic Controllers
Computer Science
ISBN:9780073373843
Author:Frank D. Petruzella
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education