Under the null hypothesis, F has an F distribution with J and N – K degrees of freedom, denoted as F-. If we use the definition of the R from (2.42), we can also write this F-statistic as (R - R)/J (1 - R)/(N – K) (2.59) where R; and R; are the usual goodness-of-fit measures for the unrestricted and the restricted models, respectively. This shows that the test can be interpreted as testing whether the increase in R² moving from the restricted model to the more general model is significant. It is clear that in this case only very large values for the test statistic imply rejection of the null hypothesis. Despite the two-sided alternative hypothesis, the critical values F-k for this test are one-sided and defined by the following equality: N-Ki

Calculus For The Life Sciences
2nd Edition
ISBN:9780321964038
Author:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Publisher:GREENWELL, Raymond N., RITCHEY, Nathan P., Lial, Margaret L.
Chapter1: Functions
Section1.2: The Least Square Line
Problem 5E
icon
Related questions
Question

What is J expalining in a F test

k = constant + coefficient

N = Sample size

Under the null hypothesis, F has an F distribution with J and N – K degrees of freedom,
denoted as F-K. If we use the definition of the R? from (2.42), we can also write this
F-statistic as
(R – R)/J
F =
(1 – R)/(N – K)
(2.59)
where R and R are the usual goodness-of-fit measures for the unrestricted and the
restricted models, respectively. This shows that the test can be interpreted as testing
whether the increase in R² moving from the restricted model to the more general model
is significant.
It is clear that in this case only very large values for the test statistic imply rejection
of the null hypothesis. Despite the two-sided alternative hypothesis, the critical values
for this test are one-sided and defined by the following equality:
N-Ka
Transcribed Image Text:Under the null hypothesis, F has an F distribution with J and N – K degrees of freedom, denoted as F-K. If we use the definition of the R? from (2.42), we can also write this F-statistic as (R – R)/J F = (1 – R)/(N – K) (2.59) where R and R are the usual goodness-of-fit measures for the unrestricted and the restricted models, respectively. This shows that the test can be interpreted as testing whether the increase in R² moving from the restricted model to the more general model is significant. It is clear that in this case only very large values for the test statistic imply rejection of the null hypothesis. Despite the two-sided alternative hypothesis, the critical values for this test are one-sided and defined by the following equality: N-Ka
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer