Tom accepted a written offer from Jill to build a house for Jill. Tom agreed to a price of $800,000. Two months into the construction, Tom realizes that he will barely make a profit on the deal. Tom informs Jill that he will not continue building her house unless Jill agrees to pay Tom an additional $200,000. Jill and Tom agree in writing that Jill will pay Tom an additional $200,000 to complete construction of the house. After Tom completes the construction of the house, Jill refuses to pay Tom the additional $200,000. Tom sues Jill alleging breach of contract with regard to the additional $200,000. Based on the facts stated in this question a. None of the answers are correct b. Tom will win as long as he is not a minor c. Tom will lose because there was no contract for this $200,000. d. Jill will lose because there was a contract for this $200,000

Tom accepted a written offer from Jill to build a house for Jill. Tom agreed to a price of $800,000. Two months into the construction, Tom realizes that he will barely make a profit on the deal. Tom informs Jill that he will not continue building her house unless Jill agrees to pay Tom an additional $200,000. Jill and Tom agree in writing that Jill will pay Tom an additional $200,000 to complete construction of the house. After Tom completes the construction of the house, Jill refuses to pay Tom the additional $200,000. Tom sues Jill alleging breach of contract with regard to the additional $200,000. Based on the facts stated in this question a. None of the answers are correct b. Tom will win as long as he is not a minor c. Tom will lose because there was no contract for this $200,000. d. Jill will lose because there was a contract for this $200,000

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX.,2020-W/ACCESS

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357110362

Author:Murphy

Publisher:Murphy

Chapter16: Tax Research

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 55DNC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Charles wants to renovate the bathroom and kitchen in his home, and he hires Veronica to do this work. They enter into a contract after agreeing to a cost of $40,000. However, once Veronica starts work, she realizes that it will cost $15,000 extra to complete the work that she promised. To show good faith to Charles, Veronica tells him that she will split the added cost with Charles and asks Charles for an additional $7,500. Charles refuses to pay the additional $7,500, and Veronica threatens to stop work on the renovation. After fearing that another contractor will probably charge much more, Charles calls Veronica and tells her he’ll pay the additional $7,500. After the renovations are completed, Charles refuses to pay the additional $7,500, despite agreeing to it. Veronica sues Charles. Who wins? Please explain.
Steve orally agrees, at a family reunion picnic, to buy Bob's farm for $250,000, and all the terms of the agreement are settled. Bob agrees to let Steve come onto the property before the closing date so that Steve can renovate the farmhouse kitchen and build a new barn before he takes over formally. By the time Bob tells Steve that he has changed his mind and that he will not be completing the transaction on the closing date, Steve has spent $40,000 on the property. Under the Statute of Frauds, since their agreement was not evidenced in writing, Steve cannot enforce it in court, and cannot recover the $40,000. Steve can use the doctrine of promissory estoppel to force Bob to complete the transaction and give him the farm in exchange for $250,000. Because of the Statute of Frauds, Steve cannot get the farm, but he can sue Bob for the tort of deceit and recover the S40,000. Steve can ask a court to order specific performance of the contract because he has spent a lot of money on the…
On December 15, Judy wrote a letter to David stating that she would sell to David all of the mine-run coal that David might wish to buy during the next calendar year for use at David’s factory, delivered at the factory at a price of $30.00 per ton. David immediately replied by letter to Judy, stating that he accepted the offer, that he would purchase all of his mine-run coal from Judy, and that he would need two hundred tons of coal during the first week in January. During the months of January, February, and March, Judy delivered to David a total of seven hundred tons of coal, for all of which David made payment to Judy at the rate of $30.00 per ton. On April 10, David ordered two hundred tons of mine-run coal from Judy, who replied to David on April 11 that she could not supply David with any more coal except at a price of $38.00 per ton delivered. David thereafter purchased elsewhere at the market price, namely $38.00 per ton, all of his factory’s requirements of mine-run coal for…
Mysty offered to sell her car to Tim for $15 000. Tim faxed a letter to her that said, "Consider it sold. I'll bring the money to you next Monday when I pick up the vehicle. Of course, for that price, I'll want you to install a new stereo in it." Tim did not hear anything more from Mysty, but he arrived at her door the following Monday with $15 000 in cash. He was delighted to find that a new stereo had been installed in the car, but disappointed when Mysty refused to accept his money or hand over the vehicle.Mysty is required to do so because there was a valid offer and acceptance. – Is this true or false?Very briefly, explain why this is true/false
Aki offered to sell her house and lot to Jannie for P2,000,000 who was interested in buying the same. In her letter, Aki stated that she was giving Jannie a period of one month within which to raise the amount. A week before the expiration of the period, Aki told Jannie that she is no longer willing to sell the property unless the price is increased to P3,000,000. May Jannie compel Aki to accept the P2,000,000 first offered? No, because the increase in the price is 50% and is deemed iniquitous and unconscionable. Yes, the period is deemed for the benefit of Darleane as it was Tin who voluntarily offered the period to her No, because the promise to sell had no cause or consideration distinct from the selling price Yes, because this is an obligation with a period intended for the benefit of both parties
I hire Susan to sell my house. I tell her that I'm hoping to get $200,000 for the house. She tells me she needs $2,000 to make repairs on the house before it is listed for sale. I give her the $2,000. She takes my money but never makes the repairs. The house sells for $220,000. If Susan is ordered to pay restitution, she will have to pay $ 2000
Spiderman offered, in writing, to sell Black Widow a piece of land for $200,000. Spiderman signed the offer and wrote that it was contingent on Black Widow accepting within 10 days. On day five, Spiderman received and accepted a better offer from Captain America and transferred the land to Captain America on that day. Black Widow, who didn't know about the sale to Captain America, called Spiderman on day seven and accepted his offer. Spiderman told Black Widow it was too late, that he got a better offer from Captain America, and that Captain America now owned the land. Black Widow sues Spiderman for breach of contract. Judgment for whom? Choose the best answer. a. Judgment for Black Widow, because Spiderman's offer was irrevocable for ten days, and Black Widow accepted on the seventh day b. Judgment for Spiderman, because her offer was revocable c. Judgment for Black Widow, because Spiderman's offer was in writing d. Judgment for Spiderman, because even if Spiderman is liable to Black…
Ben emailed Jennifer enquiring if she is willing to sell her upscale home in Manhattan to him for US$2 million. Ben is seeking to add additional real estate, to diversify his investment portfolio and is aware that Jennifer sits on a prime property in Manhattan. Ben further alluded in his email to Jennifer, that if she agrees, email to him the price she is willing to sell. Within twenty minutes, Jennifer emailed Ben, stating “The lowest price she is willing to accept for her home is US$3 million”. Ben responded immediately, stating that he agrees to purchase Jennifer’s home for US$3 million. He was of the opinion that even at US$3 million, it was still a good investment deal. The next day Ben’s attorney contacted Jennifer to arrange for the transfer of the property, which left Jennifer in shock. She pointed out to Ben’s attorney that she had no agreement with Ben to sell. Advised Jennifer on this matter.
Michiko and Saul are planning to attend the same university next year. The university estimates tuition, books, fees, and living costs to be 12,000 per year. Michikos father has agreed to give her the 12,000 she needs to attend the university. Saul has obtained a job at the university that will pay him 14,000 per year. After discussing their respective arrangements, Michiko figures that Saul will be better off than she will. What, if anything, is wrong with Michikos thinking?
Hassad owns a rental house on Lake Tahoe. He uses a real estate firm to screen prospective renters, but he makes the final decision on all rentals. He also is responsible for setting the weekly rental price of the house. During the current year, the house rents for 1,500 per week. Hassad pays a commission of 150 and a cleaning fee of 75 for each week the property is rented. During the current year, he incurs the following additional expenses related to the property: a. What is the proper tax treatment if Hassad rents the house for only 1 week (7 days) and uses it 50 days for personal purposes? b. What is the proper tax treatment if Hassad rents the house for 8 weeks (56 days) and uses it 44 days for personal purposes? c. What is the proper tax treatment if Hassad rents the house for 25 weeks (175 days) and uses it 15 days for personal purposes?
The Petersik family is considering purchasing a second home to use for short term rentals near the beach. If it purchases the house, they will place a down payment of $64,000 on the house. They estimate they will get an annual net rental profit of $8,500 after their mortgage and expenses are paid. After 18 years, they plan to pass the rental home along to their children, so assume the home has negligible salvage value. What would be the ERŘ if the Petersik family decides to invest in a rental home, assuming they keep the home for 18 years? Assume their MARR is 13%. Should the Petersik family invest in the rental home?
Mike offers to sell his car to Ricardo for $450. Ricardo accepts Mike's offer. Three days after accepting the offer, Ricardo calls Mike and says that he no longer has the money and cannot buy the car. Mike then enters into a valld contract to sell the car to Jim for $15.000. Once Ricardo hears about the contract. he calls Mike and says that he changed his mind and will buy the car of $450. Mike refuses to sell him the car. Is there a valid contract between Mike and Ricardo? OA No. The contract was discharged by Ricardo's breach. B. Yes. Ricardo's attempt to renegotiate does not affect the original contract. C. Yes. Mike agreed to sell his car and Ricardo accepted. D. No. Ricardo's counter-offer was never accepted.