There will never be full employment in the Australian economy. Do you agree? Explain your answer

2 In The Hightower Lowdown (Voiume 12, Number 5, May 2010) you could read: 5 MILLION PEOPLE (about 10% of the workforce) are out of work • UNEMPLOYMENT IS HEAVILY SKEWED BY CLASS. Among the wealthiest 10% of American families (incomes above $150,000), only 3% are unemployed - a jobless rate that rises as you go down the income scale. Among the bottom 10%, more than 30% are out of work. [R178] What average unemployment rate for the middle 80% of families fits with the given values for the top and bottom 10% to work out to the overall (weighted) average unemployment rate of 10%?

"Australia has aimed to achieve full employment by implementing various employment and labor market programs". Achieving full employment would indicate that: A. Everyone in the Australian economy has a job. B. There is no unemployment in the economy. c. Australia has reached the level of employment where all workers are fully utilized, and there is no cyclical unemployment. D. Only a small percentage of the Australian workforce is unemployed.

Why do we assume that changes to Total Factor Production are persistent? i know that its important and that it affects the outcome. is it because persistent means the changes are not temporary in the market and therefore doesnt try to readjust over time but rather it has long term affects.