The use of unification to identify appropriate substitutions for variables eliminates theinstantiation step in first-order proofs, making the process more efficient in many cases. (True/False)

Part 1: Choose two of the proofs below and use one of the indirect proof techniques (reductio ad absurdum or conditional proof) presented in Chapter 8 to demonstrate the validity of the arguments. The proofs below may use any of the rules of inference or replacement rules given in Chapter 8. 1.(G • P) → K, E → Z, ~P → ~ Z, G → (E v L), therefore, (G • ~L) → K 2.(S v T) ↔ ~E, S → (F • ~G), A → W, T → ~W, therefore, (~E • A) → ~G 3.(S v T) v (U v W), therefore, (U v T) v (S v W) 4.~Q → (L → F), Q → ~A, F → B, L, therefore, ~A v B 5.~S → (F → L), F → (L → P), therefore, ~S → (F → P) Part 2: Below are basic arguments in English. Choose two arguments and translate those argument into the symbolism of predicate logic. You do not need to do a proof. Every fetus has an immortal soul. A thing has an immortal soul only if it has a right to life. Hence, every fetus has a right to life. (Fx = x is a fetus, Sx = x has an immortal soul, Rx = x has a right to life). Some wars are just. No war of…

The following argument of TFL is invalid. ((D → B) ∧ C) ∴ ((B → C) → D)) Use a one-line truth table to show that the argument is invalid. Explain why the truth table shows that the argument is invalid. (1-2 sentences)

Please answer with explanations.