The US economy slowed significantly in early 2008, and policy makers were extremely concerned about growth. To boost the economy, Congress passed several relief packages (the Economics Stimulus Act of 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009) that combined would deliver about $700 billion in government spending. Assume, for the sake of argument, that this spending was in the form of payments made directly to consumers. The objective was to boost the economy by increasing the disposable income of American consumers.
a. Calculate the initial change in aggregate consumer spending as a consequence of this policy measure if the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) in the US is 0.5. Then calculate the resulting change in real
b. Illustrate the effect on real GDP with the use of a graph depicting the income-expenditure equilibrium. Label the vertical axis "Planned Aggregate Spending, AE planned" and the horizontal axis "Real GDP." Draw two planned aggregate expenditure
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Step by stepSolved in 3 steps with 1 images
- Q2-14 From an initial equilibrium position for the economy (at the three-way intersection of the IS, LM, and BP curves) and if the LM curve is steeper than the BP curve, expansionary fiscal policy initially leads to a balance of payments (BOP) ______, and expansionary monetary policy _______. Select one: a. deficit / also initially leads to a BOP deficit b. deficit / initially leads to a BOP surplus c. surplus / initially leads to a BOP deficit d. surplus / also initially leads to a BOP surplusarrow_forwardAn economy is operating with output that is $40 billion below its natural level, and fiscal policymakers want to close this recessionary gap. The central bank agrees to adjust the money supply to hold the interest rate constant, so there is no crowding out. The marginal propensity to consume is 4/5, and the price level is completely fixed in the short run. In what direction and by how much would government spending need to change to close the recessionary gap? Explain your thinking Please give me answer in daetail pleasearrow_forwardIn order to financially stimulate the nation, the Federal government injected $900 billion dollars into the economy. However, the results were less than spectacular. One reason could have been a failure to understand the marginal propensity to consume. Assume the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) was only 0.4. How much of that $900 billion went to increased consumption? Where did the rest of the money go? Increased consumption: Where did the rest go? Using MPC = 0.4, what is the spending multiplier (the actual numerical value please): What was the overall change in income as a result of the stimulus package after the multiplier completely works its way through the economy?arrow_forward
- The last personal savings rate recorded by the Federal Reserve database was 2.4%. Assume your average tax rate is 35%. The Federal Government recently spent $1.2T on “infrastructure”. Assuming this stands, answer the following question. 1. How much disposable income would the third iteration of this spending generate? 1.1A. What is the estimated increase in aggregate demand as a result of this bill assuming no tax increase?arrow_forwardIdentify how planned investment will change in each scenario. In an effort to reduce constant budget deficits, Congress announces plans to increase the corporate income tax rate. Due to the Congress, planned investment will increase, decrease, or stay the same? A major recession has reduced consumption spending, which has hurt profit levels for Aston-Benz, a high-end car manufacturer. Due to the recession, planned investment will increase, decrease, or stay the same?arrow_forwardPlease note that this is a multi part quesition; thank you so much for your time and effort it means so much to me! Figure 1: Hayek’s (Classical) AD-AS Model (Image normally goes here) Part 1: Why does Hayek’s aggregate supply curve always lead to an equilibrium level of national output equal to the full-employment level of real GDP? Part2: Hayek says that markets will heal themselves and that government should not intervene. How does the AD-AS model reflect Hayek’s idea that governments cannot increase real GDP beyond the level that the free market economy is able to produce? Part 3: Do you believe that the Hayek’s classical AD-AS model explain the factors that cause changes (shifts) in AS realistically? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- You have just been hired by the U.S. government to analyze the following scenario. Suppose the U.S. manufacturing industry is concerned about competition from overseas low-cost producers exporting their goods to the United States, a practice that hurts domestic producers. Lobbyists claim that implementing a tariff on imports would shrink the size of the trade deficit. The following exercise will help you to analyze this claim. The following graph shows the demand and supply of U.S. dollars in a model of the foreign-currency exchange market. Shift the demand curve, the supply curve, or both to show what would happen if the government decided to implement the tariff. REAL EXCHANGE RATE (Units of foreign currency per dollar) Supply QUANTITY OF DOLLARS Given this change, the dollar, Demand Demand Supply ?arrow_forwardOne last time, please consider a closed economy with the following information: • Economic investment = $4500 • Private savings = $3000 Output (income) = $16,000 Consumption = $11,000 This economy has no transfer payments; in other words, total taxes and "net taxes" are the same thing. Carefully following all numeric instructions, calculate this economy's taxes (T). Note that there are no transfer payments.arrow_forwardThe economy is experiencing a $225 million inflationary gap. If the government decided to solve this macroeconomic disequilibrium using a change in taxes, would you recommend an increase or decrease in taxes? If the MPC =0.9, what magnitude of tax change would be appropriate? 1) The economy is experiencing a recessionary gap of $30 billion. If the MPC=0.75, what government spending stimulus would you recommend to move the economy back to full employment? If the MPC=0.66arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education