The two strongest arguments for adopting layered protocol architecture, in your view, are the following.

Do you think it's feasible to design a data-transfer protocol that prevents every conceivable problem from occurring? If so, please be more precise.

In the layered architecture each layer consists of highly components. A disadvantage of the layered architecture is skipping to communicate.

What is the significance of "time synchronization" in the OSI model, and which layer primarily deals with it?

The Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite is based on a Department of Defense-developed theoretical model. It has become the de facto standard for communications protocol in computer networks. Using diagrams, go through the importance of TCP/IP in computer communications.

How do dependability and availability relate to one another in the setting of a computer network? As these issues have arisen, it is now considered obsolete. Should we spend a lot of time thinking about it?

How do dependability and availability relate to one another in the setting of a computer network? For the reasons discussed, it is now considered antiquated. Does this situation call for serious thought?

There has to be a breakdown of the five most common network topologies. Which one do you find more plausible, in light of what you know and believe?