The tried-and-true standard Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) has shown to be the optimum solution for many system development projects. Hence the label of "traditional." But there are certain downsides to going this route. Can you describe the merits and flaws of the SDLC approach?

Which aspects of the software development life cycle (SDLC) models does the waterfall technique cover? It is possible that the answers to your inquiries on the origins of Barry Boehm's studies may be found here.

For many system development projects, the tried-and-true standard Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) has shown to be the best option. That's why people call it "traditional." Yet, there are a few drawbacks to considering this path. Can you explain the benefits and drawbacks of the SDLC methodology?

Methodologies and the SDLC are very distinct. In your own words, define the software development life cycle (SDLC) and how it relates to software engineering methodologies.